The latest round of MLPerf benchmark results have been released, and Google’s TPU v4 supercomputers demonstrated record-breaking performance at scale. This is a timely milestone since large-scale machine learning training has enabled many of the recent breakthroughs in AI, with the latest models encompassing billions or even trillions of parameters (T5, Meena, GShard, Switch Transformer, and GPT-3). 

Google’s TPU v4 Pod was designed, in part, to meet these expansive training needs, and TPU v4 Pods set performance records in four of the six MLPerf benchmarks Google entered using TensorFlow and JAX. These scores are a significant improvement over our winning submission from last year and demonstrate that Google once again has the world’s fastest machine learning supercomputers. These TPU v4 Pods are already widely deployed throughout Google data centers for our internal machine learning workloads and will be available via Google Cloud later this year.

Figure 1: Speedup of Google’s best MLPerf Training v1.0 TPU v4 submission over the fastest non-Google submission in any availability category – in this case, all baseline submissions came from NVIDIA. Comparisons are normalized by overall training time regardless of system size. Taller bars are better.¹

Let’s take a closer look at some of the innovations that delivered these ground-breaking results and what this means for large model training at Google and beyond. 

Google’s continued performance leadership

Google’s submissions for the most recent MLPerf demonstrated leading top-line performance (fastest time to reach target quality), setting new performance records in four benchmarks. We achieved this by scaling up to 3,456 of our next-gen TPU v4 ASICs with hundreds of CPU hosts for the multiple benchmarks. We achieved an average of 1.7x improvement in our top-line submissions compared to last year’s results. This means we can now train some of the most common machine learning models in a matter of seconds.

Figure 2: Speedup of Google’s MLPerf Training v1.0 TPU v4 submission over Google’s MLPerf Training v0.7 TPU v3 submission (exception: DLRM results in MLPerf v0.7 were obtained using TPU v4). Comparisons are normalized by overall training time regardless of system size. Taller bars are better. Unet3D not shown since it is a new benchmark for MLPerf v1.0.²

We achieved these performance improvements through continued investment in both our hardware and software stacks. Part of the speedup comes from using Google’s fourth-generation TPU ASIC, which offers a significant boost in raw processing power over the previous generation, TPU v3. 4,096 of these TPU v4 chips are networked together to create a TPU v4 Pod, with each pod delivering 1.1 exaflop/s of peak performance.

Figure 3: A visual representation of 1 exaflop/s of computing power. If 10 million laptops were running simultaneously, then all that computing power would almost match the computing power of 1 exaflop/s.

In parallel, we introduced a number of new features into the XLA compiler to improve the performance of any ML model running on TPU v4. One of these features provides the ability to operate two (or potentially more) TPU cores as a single logical device using a shared uniform memory access system. This memory space unification allows the cores to easily share input and output data – allowing for a more performant allocation of work across cores. A second feature improves performance through a fine-grained overlap of compute and communication. Finally, we introduced a technique to automatically transform convolution operations such that space dimensions are converted into additional batch dimensions. This technique improves performance at the low batch sizes that are common at very large scales.

Enabling large model research using carbon-free energy

Though the margin of difference in topline MLPerf benchmarks can be measured in mere seconds, this can translate to many days worth of training time on the state-of-the-art models that comprise billions or trillions of parameters. To give an example, today we can train a 4 trillion parameter dense Transformer with GSPMD on 2048 TPU cores. For context, this is over 20 times larger than the GPT-3 model published by OpenAI last year. We are already using TPU v4 Pods extensively within Google to develop research breakthroughs such as MUM and LaMDA, and improve our core products such as Search, Assistant and Translate. The faster training times from TPUs result in efficiency savings and improved research and development velocity. Many of these TPU v4 Pods will be operating at or near 90% carbon free energy. Furthermore, cloud datacenters can be ~1.4-2X more energy efficient than typical datacenters, and the ML-oriented accelerators – like TPUs – running inside them can be ~2-5X more effective than off-the-shelf systems. 

We are also excited to soon offer TPU v4 Pods on Google Cloud, making the world’s fastest machine learning training supercomputers available to customers around the world. Cloud TPUs support leading frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Jax, and we recently released an all-new Cloud TPU system architecture that provides direct access to TPU host machines, greatly improving the user experience. 

Want to learn more? 

Please contact your Google Cloud sales representative to request early access to Cloud TPU v4 Pods. We are excited to see how you will expand the machine learning frontier with access to exaflops of TPU computing power!

^{1. All results retrieved from www.mlperf.org on June 30, 2021. MLPerf name and logo are trademarks. See www.mlperf.org for more information. Chart uses results 1.0-1067, 1.0-1070, 1.0-1071, 1.0-1072, 1.0-1073, 1.0-1074, 1.0-1075, 1.0-1076, 1.0-1077, 1.0-1088, 1.0-1089, 1.0-1090, 1.0-1091, 1.0-1092.
2. All results retrieved from www.mlperf.org on June 30, 2021. MLPerf name and logo are trademarks. See www.mlperf.org for more information. Chart uses results 0.7-65, 0.7-66, 0.7-67, 1.0-1088, 1.0-1090, 1.0-1091, 1.0-1092.}

When it comes to the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), we have reached a tipping point. Technologies that were once accessible to only a few are now broadly available. This has led to an explosion in AI investment. However, according to research firm McKinsey, for AI to make a sizable contribution to a company’s bottom line, they “must scale the technology across the organization, infusing it in core business processes” — and based on conversations with our customers, we couldn’t agree more.

While investments in pure data science continue to be essential for many, widespread adoption of AI increasingly involves a category of applications and services that we call AI agents. These are technologies that let customers apply the best of AI to common business challenges, with limited technical expertise required by employees, and include Google Cloud products like Document AI and Contact Center AI. Today, at Google Cloud Next ‘22, we’re announcing new features to our existing AI agents and a brand new one with Translation Hub.

“AI is becoming a key investment for many companies’ long term success. However, most companies are still in the experimental phases with AI and haven’t fully put the technology into production because of long deployment timelines, IT staffing needs, and more,” said Ritu Jyoti, group vice president, worldwide AI and automation research practice global AI research lead, at IDC. “Organizations need AI products that can be immediately applied to automate processes and solve business problems. Google Cloud is answering this problem by providing fully managed, scalable AI agents that can be deployed fast and deliver immediate results.”

Translation Hub: An enterprise-scale translation AI agent

At I/O this year, we announced the addition of 24 new languages to Google Translate to allow consumers in more locations, especially those whose languages aren’t represented in most technology, to help reduce communication barriers through the power of translation. Businesses strive for the same goals, but unfortunately it is often out of reach due to the high costs that come with scaling translation.

That’s why today, we are announcing Translation Hub, our AI agent that provides customers with self-service document translation. With 135 languages, Translation Hub can create impactful, inclusive, and cost-effective global communications in a few clicks.

With Translation Hub, now researchers are able to share their findings instantly across the world, goods and services providers can reach underserved markets, and public sector administrators can reach more members of their communities in a language they understand — all of which ultimately help make for a more connected, inclusive world.

Translation Hub brings together Google Cloud AI technology, like Neural Machine Translation and AutoML, to help make it easy to ingest and translate content from the most common enterprise document types, including Google Docs and Slides, PDFs, and Microsoft Word. It not only preserves layouts and formatting, but also provides granular management controls such as support for post-editing human-in-the-loop feedback and document review.

“In just three months of using Translation Hub and AutoML translation models, we saw our translated page count go up by 700% and translation cost reduced by 90%,” said Murali Nathan, digital innovation and employee experience lead, at materials science company Avery Dennison. “Beyond numbers, Google’s enterprise translation technology is driving a feeling of inclusion among our employees. Every Avery Dennison employee has access to on-demand, general purpose, and company-specific translations. English language fluency is no longer a barrier, and our employees are beginning to broadly express themselves right in their native language.”

Document AI: A document processing AI agent to automate workflows

Every organization needs to process documents, understand their content, and make them available to the appropriate people. Whether it’s during procurement cycles involving invoices and receipts, contract processes to close deals, or for general increases in efficiency, Document AI simplifies and automates various document processing. With two new features launching today, Document AI can allow employees to focus on higher impact tasks and better serve their own customers.

For example, payments provider Libeo used Document AI to uptrain an invoice parser with 1,600 documents and increase its testing accuracy from 75.6% to 83.9%. “Thanks to uptraining, the Document AI results now beat the results of a competitor and will help Libeo save ~20% on the overall cost for model training over the long run,” said Libeo chief technology officer, Pierre-Antoine Glandier.

Today, we’re announcing these new features to our existing Document AI agent:

• Document AI Workbench can remove the barriers around building custom document parsers, helping organizations extract fields of interest that are specific to their business needs. Relative to more traditional development approaches, it requires less training data and offers a simple interface for both labeling data and one-click model training.
• Document AI Warehouse can eliminate the challenges that many enterprises face when tagging and extracting data in documents by bringing Google’s Search technologies to Document AI. This feature can make it simpler and easier to search for and manage documents like workflow controls to accommodate invoice processing, contracts, approvals, and custom workflows.

Contact Center AI: A contact center AI agent to improve customer experiences

Scaling call center support can be expensive and difficult, especially when implementing AI technologies to support representatives. Contact Center AI is an AI agent for virtually all contact center needs, from intelligently routing customers, to facilitating handoffs between virtual and human customer support representatives, to analyzing call center transcripts for trends and much more.

Just days ago, we announced that Contact Center AI Platform is now generally available to provide additional deployment choice and flexibility. With this addition to Contact Center AI, we are furthering our commitment to providing an AI agent that can assist organizations to quickly scale their contact centers to improve customer experiences and create value via data-driven decisions.

Dean Kontul, division chief information officer at KeyBank, had this to say about powering their contact center with Contact Center AI from Google Cloud: “With Google Cloud and Contact Center AI, we will quickly move our contact center to the Cloud, supporting both our customers and agents with industry-leading customer experience innovations, all while streamlining operations through more efficient customer care operations.”

Start delivering business results with AI agents, today!

If you’re ready to get started with Translation Hub, this Next ‘22 session has the details, including a deeper dive into Avery Dennison’s use of the AI agent.

To learn more about our Document AI announcements, check out our session with Commerzbank, “Improve document efficiency with AI,” as well as “Transform digital experiences with Google AI powered search and recommendations.”

And, to explore Contact Center AI Platform, watch “Delight customers in every interaction with Contact Center AI,” featuring more insight into KeyBank’s use case.

As lead for analytics and AI solutions at Google Cloud, my team works with startups building on Google Cloud. This puts us in the fortunate position to learn from founders and engineers about how early-stage startups’ investments can either constrain them or position them for success, even at the seed level. In this post, I want to share a few of the best practices to keep in mind as you’re building. 

Understand your value proposition before diving into a technology stack

If you’re launching a startup in the cloud, you’re no doubt thinking about a technology stack, but it’s important to step back a bit and think carefully about the major value proposition that your startup offers to your customers. That value proposition is going to fundamentally drive the kind of technology that you should pick.

For example, does your system need processing in real time, or can it be done in a batch mode? Can you rely on once-a-day insights or do the insights have to come in as events happen?

Additionally, what kind of latency will your customers face? That latency makes your value proposition either usable or unusable. Early on in Google’s development, leaders realized that no one was going to wait more than a few hundred milliseconds for a web page to show them their results, and that realization drove the technology decisions that have allowed Google to scale from being a startup in a garage to being a trillion dollar company. Your startup needs to define its value to customers with this level of specificity before it can build a technology stack suited to its needs. 

Focus on customer interactions

A few companies have gracefully pulled off big IT pivots that reshaped their value proposition. Netflix, for example, moved from mostly sending DVDs through the mail to becoming a streaming service and major content producer. That’s a huge shift in the user experience and the technology stack necessary to support it, even if the underlying value proposition (i.e., get content to customers) was broadly the same. But it’s also an outlier. If you’re planning for potential changes of this magnitude, rather than focused on getting your value proposition to users, you probably need to sharpen what that value proposition is.

Specifically, you need a clear vision of how customers will access and interact with your business. Typically, they’ll do so over a website or a mobile app, but there are still so many variables. 

Are customers going to transmit documents? If so, in what format? Is handwriting supported or is input limited to typing? Can they use images for optical character recognition? Will it mostly be forms? Will the data be structured or unstructured? If all that sounds  a little overwhelming, don’t worry, it’ll seem simpler by the end of this article—but also be aware: we’re just getting warmed up.

Imagine that most of your customers will access your business via voice, so you know you’ll want to prioritize conversational workflows. That’s a start—but dig deeper.  Even if we suppose you’re usingDialogflow, a Google Cloud conversational AI platform that lets you build and deploy virtual agents, we’re still not really seeing the value proposition.  How will all this work, from the beginning of a typical full customer interaction to the resolution? How many interactions will have to be facilitated over low-bandwidth connections, for example? When it comes to user interactions, make sure you can see an end-to-end use case.

Another example: you’re building a retail website, and one of your end-to-end use cases involves the customer asking if a certain amount of a given product is in stock, whether it’s one unit of the product, ten or hundreds. If the product is not sufficiently stocked, you want your app to offer similar items that are. Will your technology stack support this end-to-end use case?

These considerations are not an argument for premature optimization. There’s value in moving fast, getting minimum viable products to users, and then iterating. But in the early stages, you only get one chance to start on the right foot—and how you navigate that chance will influence a lot of dollars and effort down the road. You need to make sure you have business use cases, not just an idea, before you can start designing a technology stack.  

Here’s how to get in the right frame of mind. Pick three use cases: two that are “bread and butter” and one that is technologically complex.  Make sure your proposed technology stack can support all three, end to end. 

Default toward higher levels of abstraction

Now that we’re in the right frame of mind, we’re ready to think about the technology stack more directly. 

As a startup, you’ll need to conserve resources, and to do that, you’ll want to build at the highest level of abstraction possible for your value proposition. For example, you probably don’t want your people setting up clusters. You don’t want them configuring things if they can use a fully managed service. You want them focused on building your prototype, not managing infrastructure.

This focus has definitely informed how we create products at Google Cloud, as our canonical data stack—Pub/Sub, Dataflow, BigQuery, and Vertex AI—consists of auto-scaling and serverless products.

But management of infrastructure is not the only place where you should err toward a less-is-more philosophy. 

When it comes to architecture, choose no-code over low-code and low-code over writing custom code. For example, rather than writing ETL pipelines to transform the data you need before you land it into BigQuery, you could use pre-built connectors to directly land the raw data into BigQuery. That’s no code right there. Then, transform the data into the form you need using SQL views directly in the data warehouse. This is called ELT, and it is low code. You will be a lot more agile if you choose an ELT approach over an ETL approach. 

Another place is when you choose your ML modeling framework. Don’t start with custom TensorFlow models. Start with AutoML. That’s no-code. You can invoke AutoML directly from BigQuery, avoiding the need to build complex data and ML pipelines. If necessary, move on to pre-built models from TensorFlow Hub, HuggingFace, etc. That’s low-code. Build your own custom ML models only as a last resort.

Focus on getting your vision to market, not chasing technology hype  

The goal is to pick the right technology stack for bringing your vision to market, generating value for customers, conserving resources, and maintaining flexibility for growth. Early IT investments should usually gravitate toward things that preserve flexibility, such as managed services built on standard protocols or open APIs, but they needn’t always rush to the flashiest technologies.  The answer isn’t always ML, for example. The answer might be heuristics to start, with a path to ML once you have collected enough data. You want to make sure that your intelligence layer has enough abstraction so you can mark it up with simple rules at first, but then replace it with a more robust system as you go along. 

Launch and iterate fast with these principles 

The preceding discussion is a reminder that your most expensive resource is your people—and that you really want them to be focused on building your prototype, minimum viable product or production app  You want to launch fast and iterate fast, and the only way you can do that is by focusing on the things that differentiate you. 

But regardless of the technologies you use, the bottom line is the same: follow these four principles. 

• Figure out your major value proposition and design your tech stack around it. 
• Be very careful about user interactions. User experience is super important; you need to make sure you deliver the kind of experience that your customers have grown to expect.
• When you’re building, pick the highest possible level of abstraction possible—the most fully managed tools and no-code/low-code frameworks that give you the functionality that you need. 
• Instead of choosing new or flashy technologies, consider if you can build a “good enough” minimum viable product quickly and come back to a better implementation later. 

To learn more about why startups are choosing Google Cloud, click here.

Businesses around the globe are realizing the benefits of replacing legacy data silos with cloud-based enterprise data warehouses, including easier collaboration across business units and access to insights within their data that were previously unseen. However, bringing data from numerous disparate data sources into a single data warehouse requires you to develop pipelines that ingest data from these various sources into your enterprise data warehouse. Historically, this has meant that data engineering teams across the organization procure and implement various tools to do so. But this adds significant complexity to managing and maintaining all these pipelines and makes it much harder to effectively scale these efforts across the organization. Developing enterprise-grade, cloud-native pipelines to bring data into your data warehouse can alleviate many of these challenges. But, if done incorrectly, these pipelines can present new challenges that your teams will have to spend their time and energy addressing. 

Developing cloud-based data ingestion pipelines that replicate data from various sources into your cloud data warehouse can be a massive undertaking that requires significant investment of staffing resources. Such a large project can seem overwhelming and it can be difficult to identify where to begin planning such a project. We have defined the following principles for data pipeline planning to begin the process. These principles are intended to help you answer key business questions about your effort and begin to build data pipelines that address your business and technical needs. Each section below details a principle of data pipelines and certain factors your teams should consider as they begin developing their pipelines.

Principle 1: Clarify your objectives

The first principle to consider for pipeline development is clarify your objectives. This can be broadly defined as taking a holistic approach to pipeline development that encompasses requirements from several perspectives: technical teams, regulatory or policy requirements, desired outcomes, business goals, key timelines, available teams and their skill sets, and downstream data users. Clarifying your objectives clearly identifies and defines requirements from each key stakeholder at the beginning of the process and continually checks development against these requirements to ensure the pipelines built will meet these requirements.This is done by first clearly defining the desired end state for each project in a way that addresses a demonstrated business need of downstream data users. Remember that data pipelines are almost always the means to accomplish your end state, rather than the end state itself. An example of an effectively defined end-state is “enabling teams to gain a better understanding of our customers by providing access to our CRM data within our cloud data warehouse” rather than “move data from our CRM to our cloud data warehouse”. This may seem like a merely semantic difference, but framing the problem in terms of business needs helps your teams make technical decisions that will best meet these needs. 

After clearly defining the business problem you are trying to solve, you should facilitate requirement gathering from each stakeholder and use these requirements to guide the technical development and implementation of your ingestion pipelines. We recommend gathering stakeholders from each team, including downstream data users, prior to development to gather requirements for the technical implementation of the data pipeline. These will include critical timelines, uptime requirements, data update frequency, data transformation, DevOps needs, and security, policy, or regulatory requirements by which a data pipeline must meet.

Principle 2: Build your team

The second principle to consider for pipeline development is build your team. This means ensuring you have the right people with the right skills available in the right places to develop, deploy, and maintain your data pipelines. After you have gathered your pipeline requirements, you can begin to develop a summary architecture that will be used to build and deploy your data pipelines. This will help you identify the human talent you will need to successfully build, deploy, and manage these data pipelines and identify any potential shortfalls that would require additional support from either third-party partners or new team members.

Not only do you need to ensure you have the right people and skill sets available in aggregate, but these individuals need to be effectively structured to empower them to maximize their abilities. This means developing team structures that are optimized for each team’s responsibilities and their ability to support adjacent teams as needed.

This also means developing processes that prevent blockers to technical development whenever possible, such as ensuring that teams have all of the appropriate permissions they need to move data from the original source to your cloud data warehouse without violating the concept of least privilege. Developers need access to the original data source (depending on your requirements and architecture) in addition to the destination data warehouse. Examples of this are ensuring that developers have access to develop and/or connect to a Salesforce Connected App or read access to specific Search Ads 360 data fields.

Principle 3: Minimize time to value

The third principle to consider for pipeline development is minimize time to value. This means considering the long-term maintenance burden of a data pipeline prior to developing and deploying it in addition to being able to deploy a minimum viable pipeline as quickly as possible. Generally speaking, we recommend the following approach to building data pipelines to minimize their maintenance burden: Write as little code as possible. Functionally, this can be implemented by:

1. Leveraging interface-based data ingestion products whenever possible. These products minimize the amount of code that requires ongoing maintenance and empower users who aren’t software developers to build data pipelines. They can also reduce development time for data pipelines, allowing them to be deployed and updated more quickly. 

• Products like Google Data Transfer Service and Fivetran allow for managed data ingestion pipelines by any user to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, file systems, and other tooling. With little to no code required, these managed services enable you to connect your data warehouse to your sources quickly and easily.
• For workloads managed by ETL developers and data engineers, tools like Google Cloud’s Data Fusion provide an easy-to-use visual interface for designing, managing and monitoring advanced pipelines with complex transformations.

2. Whenever interface-based products or data connectors are insufficient, use pre-existing code templates. Examples of this include templates available for Dataflow that allow users to define variables and run pipelines for common data ingestion use cases, and the Public Datasets pipeline architecture that our Datasets team uses for onboarding.

3. If neither of these options are sufficient, utilize managed services to deploy code for your pipelines. Managed services, such as Dataflow or Dataproc, eliminate the operational overhead of managing pipeline configuration by automatically scaling pipeline instances within predefined parameters.

Principle 4: Increase data trust and transparency

The fourth principle to consider for pipeline development is increase data trust and transparency. For the purposes of this document, we define this as the process of overseeing and managing data pipelines across all tools. Numerous data ingestion pipelines that each leverage different tools or are not developed under a coordinated management plan can result in “tech sprawl”, which significantly increases the management overhead of data ingestion pipelines as the quantity of data pipelines increases. This becomes especially cumbersome if you are subject to service-level agreements, or legal, regulatory, or policy requirements for overseeing data pipelines. Preventing tech sprawl is, by far, the best strategy for dealing with it by developing streamlined pipeline management processes that automate reporting. Although this can theoretically be achieved by building all of your data pipelines using a single cloud-based product, we do not recommend doing so because it prevents you from taking advantage of features and cost optimizations that come with choosing the best product for your use case. 

A monitoring service such as Google Cloud Monitoring Service or Splunk that automates metrics, events, and metadata collection from various products, including those hosted in on-premise and hybrid computing environments, can help you centralize reporting and monitoring of your data pipelines. A metadata management tool such as Google Cloud’s Data Catalog or Informatica’s Enterprise Data Catalog can help you better communicate the nuances of your data so users better understand which data resources are best fit for a given use case. This significantly reduces your pipeline’s governance burden by eliminating manual reporting processes that often result in inaccuracies or lagging updates.

Principle 5: Manage costs

The fifth principle to consider for pipeline development is manage costs. This encompasses both the cost of cloud resources and the staffing costs necessary to design, develop, deploy, and maintain your cloud resources. We believe that your goal should not necessarily be to minimize cost, but rather maximizing the value of your investment. This means maximizing the impact of every dollar spent by minimizing waste in cloud resource utilization and human time. There are several factors to consider when it comes to managing costs:

• Use the right tool for the job – Different data ingestion pipelines will have different requirements for latency, uptime, transformations, etc. Similarly, different data pipeline tools have different strengths and weaknesses. Choosing the right tool for each data pipeline can help your pipelines operate significantly more efficiently. This can reduce your overall cost, free up staffing time to focus on the most impactful projects, and make your pipelines much more efficient.
• Standardize resource labeling –  Implement and utilize a consistent labeling schema across all tools and platforms to have the most comprehensive view of your organization’s spending. One example is requiring all resources to be labeled by the cost center or team at time of creation. Consistent labeling allows you to monitor your spend across different teams and calculate the overall value of your cloud spending.
• Implement cost controls – If available, leverage cost controls to prevent errors that result in unexpectedly large bills. 
• Capture cloud spend – Capture your spend on all cloud resource utilization for internal analysis using a cloud data warehouse and a data visualization tool. Without it, you won’t understand the context of changes in cloud spend and how they correlate with changes in business.
• Make cost management everyone’s job – Managing costs should be part of the responsibilities of everyone who can create or utilize cloud resources. To do this well, we recommend making cloud spend reporting more transparent internally and/or implementing chargebacks to internal cost centers based on utilization.

Long-term, the increased granularity in cost reporting available within Google Cloud can help you better measure your key performance indicators. You can shift from cost-based reporting (i.e. – “We spent $X on BigQuery storage last month”) to value-based reporting (i.e. – “It costs $X to serve customers who bring in $Y revenue”). 

To learn more about managing costs, check out Google Cloud’s “Understanding the principles of cost optimization” white paper.

Principle 6: Leverage continually improving services

The sixth principle is leverage continually improving services. Cloud services are consistently improving their performance and stability, even if some of these improvements are not obvious to users. These improvements can help your pipelines run faster, cheaper, and more consistently over time. You can take advantage of the benefits of these improvements by:

• Automating both your pipelines and pipeline management: Not only should data pipelines be automated, but almost all aspects of managing your pipelines can also be automated. This includes pipeline/data lineage tracking, monitoring, cost management, scheduling, access management and more. This helps reduce long-term operational costs of each data pipeline that can significantly alter your value proposition and prevent any manual configurations from negating the benefits of later product improvements.
• Minimizing pipeline complexity whenever possible: While ingestion pipelines are relatively easy to develop using UI-based or managed services, they also require continued maintenance as long as they are in use. The most easily maintained data ingestion pipelines are typically the ones that minimize complexity and leverage automatic optimization capabilities. Any transformation in a data ingestion pipeline is a manual optimization of the pipeline that may struggle to adapt or scale as the underlying services improve. You can minimize the need for such transformations by building ELT (extract, load, transform) pipelines rather than ETL (extract, transform, load) pipelines. This pushes transformations down to the data warehouse that is use a specifically optimized query engine to transform your data rather than manually configured pipelines.

Next steps

If you’re looking for more information about developing your cloud-based data platform, check out our Build a modern, unified analytics data platform whitepaper. You can also visit our data integration site to learn more and find ways to get started with your data integration journey.

Once you’re ready to begin building your data ingestion pipelines, learn more about how Cloud Data Fusion and Fivetran can help you make sure your pipelines address these principles.