
AirAsia Turns to Google Cloud to refine Pricing, Increase Revenue, and Improve Customer Experience
READ FULL INTRODOWNLOAD AGAIN7116
Of your peers have already downloaded this article
1:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
MerPay Platform Scales its Reach to Millions of Users using Cloud Spanner

5278
Of your peers have already read this article.
2:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Editor’s note: To launch a new mobile payment platform, Mercari needed a database solution strong on scalability, availability, and performance. Here’s how Cloud Spanner delivered those results.
E-commerce companies need to connect customers to their services securely, reliably, with zero downtime. When Mercari, Inc. launched a new mobile payment platform, we chose Cloud Spanner as part of our data portfolio, which provided us with easy scalability to handle millions of new users, a fully managed service that minimized overhead costs, and deep integration with other Google Cloud services.
Mercari, Inc., Japan’s largest C2C marketplace, launched its app in 2013, which allows 18.2million monthly users to easily and securely buy new and used items. Mercari expanded into the United States and in 2014 and launched Merpay, a mobile payment service that can be used through Mercari in Japan in 2017. With more than 85 million users, Merpay is now accepted at 1.8 million merchants and e-commerce sites in Japan, supporting payments via the DOCOMO ID contactless system and QR code.
Prioritizing availability and scalability
When we started building Merpay, we were looking for a new database. In the past, Mercari had used MySQL with bare metal hardware. Because of the amount of data, we required additional expertise to manage and maintain the hardware, software and MySQL implementation. Having built much of the microservices architecture for our Mercari app using Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), it was natural to look at Google Cloud’s managed services when deciding upon our new database infrastructure for Merpay.
For the database, we were focusing especially on requirements around availability, scalability, and performance. To do a single payment transaction, there were multiple steps each with writes, requiring high-write-throughput and low-latency from the database. Needing a solution that would support reliable payment processing 24/7/365, we chose Spanner, which offers up to 99.999% availability with zero downtime for planned maintenance and schema changes.
We worked closely with Google Cloud’s Premium Support, Technical Account Management (TAM), and Strategic Cloud Engineer and Cloud Consultant teams to implement Spanner, including separating the payment processing— originally one of the functions in Mercari—as a microservice.
A nod to easier nodes and better scale
After launch, the number of Merpay users reached 2 million in only a few months. We had 45 Spanner nodes at the time of launch of Merpay and about 50 nodes four months later. Because we’d optimized the application side during those four months, we didn’t have to add many nodes to keep up with the growing traffic.
Whenever we needed to scale up the serving and storage resources in our instances, Spanner made it easy to increase nodes as needed in the Cloud Console. To optimize costs, it’s easy to add nodes during a marketing campaign and remove them afterward. Even if the traffic count is different from expected, we can change the number of nodes immediately. That’s one incredible convenience of Cloud Spanner.
Building powerful pipelines
Our data pipelines are used for KPI analytics, fraud detection, credit scoring, and customer support use cases. Because Cloud Spanner integrates so easily with other Google Cloud data services, the data in Spanner is easily accessible for analytics. From the Spanner database for each microservice, we create both batch and streaming data pipelines using Pub/Sub and Dataflow, as well as Apache Flink, and load the data into BigQuery and Google Cloud Storage. We’re able to quickly aggregate the data required for data platforms such as BigQuery and Cloud Storage. The original data is stored in Spanner and managed by microservices, but analysis through BigQuery is centrally managed by the Data Platform team. This team determines the confidentiality level of data and centrally manages BigQuery permissions using Terraform. By centrally managing data access permissions on the data platform rather than on individual microservices, we’re able to set appropriate security for individual users.
Our full data portfolio also includes Looker, which we use for product analysis, accounting analysis, test performance visualization, operation monitoring, development efficiency analysis, and HR analysis. We also use Dataproc, Cloud Composer, Data Catalog, and Data Studio. The Dataflow template created for the pipeline is also published as OSS.
With Spanner and other Google Cloud services, our Merpay platform is flexible, secure, scalable and highly available. As Spanner eliminates overhead, we can devote engineering resources to developing new tools and solutions for our customers. We’re looking ahead at providing cryptocurrency service, for example, and are now working on a project to migrate Mercari’s monolithic system that is still on premises entirely over to Google Cloud.
Read more about Mercari and Merpay. Or check out our recent blog: three reasons to consider Cloud Spanner for your next project.
What Swiggy and You Can Learn From This Company’s Use of ML to Engage Customers

9638
Of your peers have already read this article.
1:45 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
The app economy has enabled a huge range of unique business models to flourish. One such model is online food ordering and delivery services, in which apps leverage geo-location data to aggregate local food choices and offer personalized options to consumers.
A leading company in this space is Just Eat. Launched in the UK in 2001 with a vision of ‘serving the world’s greatest menu. Brilliantly.’ The company has capitalized on the popularity of online food delivery and grown its presence across 12 markets.
Just Eat acts as an intermediary between take-out food outlets and hungry customers, giving local restaurants access to a broader base of potential diners, while providing consumers with an easy and secure way to order and pay for food from their favourite restaurants.
Today the company helps 27 million customers find food from more than 112,000 restaurants—everything from homemade Italian pasta, to Chinese noodle bowls, to fish-and-chips.
Data is the fuel of Just Eat’s rapid growth, but it wasn’t always looked at that way. In its early days, Just Eat struggled with the deluge of information and faced fragmentation across its systems. In fact, the company realized its legacy data vendor wasn’t capable of ingesting 90 percent of the data produced by its food platform. This was incredibly frustrating for Just Eat’s analysts and data scientists, who had to waste time cleaning up sources instead of leveraging the data to create a better user experience.
Just Eat turned to Google Cloud, and now uses machine learning (ML) to power sophisticated consumer recommendations on both its app and website. It also makes heavy use of features offered by Google Cloud Platform, including BigQuery for running analytics on its customer data set and Cloud Pub/Sub for messaging app users with relevant offers in real-time.
Having all of Just Eat’s data in one platform has translated into real value for its customers. With Google Cloud tools, Just Eat has created its own proprietary Customer Ontology framework, which today contains 5.5 billion features that better understand consumers’ behavior and food habits, and provides insights into previous visits.
Just Eat recently created an “Adventurous Index” to map its customers according to their ordering habits, enabling them to tailor their marketing and user experiences. For example, mid-adventurous customers are shown a choice of restaurants that serve their most ordered cuisine, while adventurous customers can choose from restaurants that serve a wider variety. This not only has prompted consumers to be more adventurous with their choices, but also has led to more business at a more diverse set of restaurants.
Matt Cresswell, Director of Customer Platforms at Just Eat said that Google Cloud has become integral to its product delivery: “Consumer food choice is a hugely nuanced topic. We know that individuals have their own unique journeys when they use Just Eat. We’ve sought to create a truly one-to-one relationship with every customer. The changes we’ve made to the platform mean they can access the dishes they enjoy at the touch of a fingertip, and find inspiration to discover new dishes they’ll love. We’re grateful to Google Cloud for helping us support our customers on their culinary explorations.”
A Recap on Google Cloud Databases and Storage Options- Part 2

3953
Of your peers have already read this article.
6:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Isaac Newton said, “If I have seen farther than others it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants.” He meant that in order to explain the Law of Gravity, he used the work of major thinkers who came before him in order to make intellectual progress (as-in giving credit). In the 1640’s (yes, the time of the English Civil War and the start of the mini Ice Age), we can say the Age of Reason began and the word “data” was also (re)born in a way.
Why? Hard to assert a specific reason, it could be apropos of all those events of that decade, and somewhere amidst all that, the scientists and Churchmen (rather Churchman, Henry Hammond who really coined the term data) started to pen down their credit in books and there was a continued proliferation of data to reason their finding (and most times to reason why their work was better than that of the others). And thus comes to us the word datum from the Latin verb dare (it means “to give”, not the English dare).
Dare to Recap History?
Data is history captured through language (it has become the future as well, but that is for another day). Now we all like history (well, most of us). But it is highly likely the context gets lost in the complexity and style of definition. One way to mitigate that risk is to have a clear set of definitions (language), sustained hold of events (history), a clean process of capture (extract) and a scalable process for translation and aggregation (transform). If we want our data to be successful and rise to the occasion, then we need to keep these ways to mitigate the risk of complexity in mind.
And this is exactly what we discussed in the Part 1 of this blog series, Data Modeling Basics—the various business attributes, technical aspects, design questions, and considerations for designing your database model.
In this blog…
We will look into the different databases and storage options in Google Cloud, a brief note on each one of them, when to choose one over the other, interesting alternatives, exceptions and if you make it to the end of the blog, a fun challenge to make sure we put this little tech nugget to an ACID test (see what I did there?). If you are a cloud enthusiast, a database practitioner, a data geek, or a general wonderer of life with computing, you may find this engaging…
Google Cloud Storage Options
We at Google Cloud, have realized how hard it is to go through these laundry list assessment aspects and have made it simpler for you with a Decision Tree. (Of course, It ain’t Christmas if not for the tree):

If only the world was always “Structured”
In a structured world, you will know all the attributes on a first-name basis (I mean to say that you will have a well defined fixed set of attributes that can be modeled in a table of rows and columns), and the applications are transactional or analytical in orientation. Transactional Structured Data operate one row at a time generally and they need to adhere to ACID compliance. (Ah. Now you connect the dots, if not already.) ACID properties are Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability. Cloud SQL and Cloud Spanner are our Google Cloud choices for Transactional Structured Data use cases.
Let’s look at the below aspects for each type and structure of data:
- Why that option? (highlights and key features)
- When to choose?
- When not to choose?
- Security aspects
Cloud SQL
- Fully Managed, cloud-native RDBMS (Relational DataBase Management System) that offers both MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server engines
- Cloud SQL is accessible from apps running on App Engine, GKE, or Compute Engine
Note: A managed database is one that does not require as much administration and operational support (creating databases, performing backups, updating the operating system of database instances) as an unmanaged database.
When to use Cloud SQL?
- Typical online transaction processing (OLTP) workloads
- Lift and shift of on-premise SQL databases (or from anywhere else) to cloud
- Regional applications that do not need to store > 30 TB of data in a single instance
When not to use Cloud SQL?
Cloud SQL is not an appropriate storage system for online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads or data that requires dynamic schemas on a per-object basis.
Security
Data stored is encrypted both in transit and at rest. Have built-in support for access control, using network firewalls to manage database access.
Cloud Spanner
Relational, horizontally scalable, global database with strong consistency- Supports schemas, ACID transactions, and SQL queries (ANSI 2011)
- Scales horizontally in regions, but can also scale across regions for workloads that have more stringent availability requirements
When to use Cloud Spanner?
- For large amounts of data and when you require high transactional consistency
- When you require sharding for higher throughput, access and low latency
When not to use Cloud Spanner?
Cloud Spanner is not an appropriate storage system for online analytical processing (OLAP) workloads
Security
Security features in Spanner include data-layer encryption, audit logging, and Identity and Access Management (IAM) integration.
Analytical Structure is when we want the data to tell us an aggregated or enhanced story, for which we use limited columns and multiple rows and hence mostly use a Column-Oriented storage mechanism. Column-oriented storage is if we want to store the data in the tables by columns instead of by rows, and this column-oriented storage is done to efficiently access only a subset of columns for querying. BigQuery is the data warehouse option for analytics needs.
BigQuery
BigQuery is a fully managed Data Warehouse for analytics with built-in data transfer service- Peta-byte scale, low-cost warehouse that supports loading data through the web interface, command line tools, and REST API calls
- Incorporates features for machine learning, business intelligence, and geospatial analysis that are provided through BigQuery ML, BI Engine, and GIS.
Note: A data warehouse stores large quantities of data for query and analysis instead of transactional processing.
When to use BigQuery?
For use cases that cover process analytics and optimization, big data (Petabyte scale) processing and analytics, data warehouse modernization, machine learning-based behavioral analytics, and predictions
When not to use BigQuery?
BigQuery is not a Transactional database and is oriented on running analytical queries, not for simple CRUD operations and queries.
Security
BigQuery provides encryption at rest and in transit. Cloud Data Loss Prevention (Cloud DLP) can be used to scan the BigQuery tables and to protect sensitive data and meet compliance requirements. BigQuery supports access control of datasets and tables using Identity and Access Management (IAM).
And then we have the Semi-structured and the Unstructured world of data that we will address in the below sections.
Cloud Firestore (Cloud Datastore)
Firestore is the next major version of Datastore and a re-branding of the product. Taking the best of Datastore and the Firebase Realtime Database, Firestore is a NoSQL document database built for automatic scaling, high performance, and ease of application development.
- A fully managed, serverless NoSQL Google Cloud database designed for the development of serverless apps that stores JSON data
- Can be used to store, sync, and query data for web, mobile, and IoT applications
- Automatically handles sharding and replication making it highly available, durable, and scalable
- Provides ACID transactions, SQL-like queries, indexes, and more
- If a client does not have network connectivity, the Firestore API lets your app persist data to a local disk and synchronizes itself with the current server state once connectivity is reestablished
When to use?
For use cases of app development, live synchronization, offline support, multi-user collaborative applications, leader board, etc.
When not to use?
Not a relational database so not meant for relational structured data use cases.
Security
Firestore Security Rules support serverless authentication and authorization for the mobile and web client libraries. Identity and Access Management (IAM) manages database access.
Cloud Bigtable
- Bigtable is a wide-column, fully managed, high-performance NoSQL database service designed for terabyte- to petabyte-scale workloads
- Bigtable is battle tested on Google internal Bigtable database infrastructure that powers Google Search, Google Analytics, Google Maps, and Gmail
- Provides consistent, low-latency, and high-throughput storage for large-scale NoSQL data
When to use?
- For large amounts of single key data and is preferable for low-latency, high throughput workloads
- For real-time app serving workloads and large-scale analytical workloads
When not to use?
While Bigtable is considered an OLTP system, it doesn’t support multi-row transactions, SQL queries or joins. For those use cases, consider either Cloud SQL or Datastore.
Security
- All the data at rest in Cloud Bigtable is encrypted using Google’s default encryption, by default.
- Instead of Google managing the encryption keys that protect your data, your Bigtable instance can also be protected using a key that you manage (customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK)) in Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS).
Cloud Storage
- Google Cloud Storage is an object storage system that is durable and highly available, persists unstructured data like images, videos, data files, videos, backup, and other data
- It is unstructured and so the files in the cloud storage are atomic that you read the entire file but you cannot access specific blocks in the files
- Cloud Storage is available in multiple classes, depending on the availability and performance required for apps and services
- Standard – Offers the highest levels of availability and is appropriate for storing data that requires low-latency access
Nearline – Low-cost, highly durable, fast-access storage service for storing data that you access less than once per month
Coldline – Very-low-cost, highly durable, fast-access storage service for storing data that you intend to access less than once per quarter
Archive – Lowest-cost, highly durable, fast-access storage service for storing data that you intend to access less than once per year
Security
Files in Cloud Storage are organized by project into individual buckets. These buckets can support either custom access control lists (ACLs) or centralized identity and access management (IAM) controls.
Firebase Realtime Database
- Firebase is a realtime, NoSQL, Google Cloud database that is a part of the Firebase platform that allows you to store and sync data in real-time and includes caching capabilities for offline use
- Data is stored as JSON and synchronized in real-time to every connected client and remains available when app goes offline
When to use?
For mobile and web app development, development of apps that work across devices
When not to use?
Not in relational dataset use cases. The Realtime Database is a NoSQL database and as such has different optimizations and functionality compared to a relational database. The Realtime Database API is designed to only allow operations that can be executed quickly.
Security
The Realtime Database provides a flexible, expression-based rules language, called Firebase Realtime Database Security Rules, to define how your data should be structured and when data can be read from or written to. When integrated with Firebase Authentication, developers can define who has access to what data, and how they can access it.
That’s a rather packed read. But I hope you find this useful to understand comprehensively the basics of data, storage options and databases in Google Cloud Platform.
Next Steps, before I go…
In the blog part 1 of the series, I ended with an action item – “How would you model a NoSQL solution for an application that needs to query the lineage between individual entities that are represented in pairs?”.
Well, my answer is Firestore. As part of this episode, why don’t you take some time to go over the options and key aspects that attribute to this.
A Breakdown of Cloud-based Data Ingestion Practices

8811
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Businesses around the globe are realizing the benefits of replacing legacy data silos with cloud-based enterprise data warehouses, including easier collaboration across business units and access to insights within their data that were previously unseen. However, bringing data from numerous disparate data sources into a single data warehouse requires you to develop pipelines that ingest data from these various sources into your enterprise data warehouse. Historically, this has meant that data engineering teams across the organization procure and implement various tools to do so. But this adds significant complexity to managing and maintaining all these pipelines and makes it much harder to effectively scale these efforts across the organization. Developing enterprise-grade, cloud-native pipelines to bring data into your data warehouse can alleviate many of these challenges. But, if done incorrectly, these pipelines can present new challenges that your teams will have to spend their time and energy addressing.
Developing cloud-based data ingestion pipelines that replicate data from various sources into your cloud data warehouse can be a massive undertaking that requires significant investment of staffing resources. Such a large project can seem overwhelming and it can be difficult to identify where to begin planning such a project. We have defined the following principles for data pipeline planning to begin the process. These principles are intended to help you answer key business questions about your effort and begin to build data pipelines that address your business and technical needs. Each section below details a principle of data pipelines and certain factors your teams should consider as they begin developing their pipelines.
Principle 1: Clarify your objectives
The first principle to consider for pipeline development is clarify your objectives. This can be broadly defined as taking a holistic approach to pipeline development that encompasses requirements from several perspectives: technical teams, regulatory or policy requirements, desired outcomes, business goals, key timelines, available teams and their skill sets, and downstream data users. Clarifying your objectives clearly identifies and defines requirements from each key stakeholder at the beginning of the process and continually checks development against these requirements to ensure the pipelines built will meet these requirements.This is done by first clearly defining the desired end state for each project in a way that addresses a demonstrated business need of downstream data users. Remember that data pipelines are almost always the means to accomplish your end state, rather than the end state itself. An example of an effectively defined end-state is “enabling teams to gain a better understanding of our customers by providing access to our CRM data within our cloud data warehouse” rather than “move data from our CRM to our cloud data warehouse”. This may seem like a merely semantic difference, but framing the problem in terms of business needs helps your teams make technical decisions that will best meet these needs.
After clearly defining the business problem you are trying to solve, you should facilitate requirement gathering from each stakeholder and use these requirements to guide the technical development and implementation of your ingestion pipelines. We recommend gathering stakeholders from each team, including downstream data users, prior to development to gather requirements for the technical implementation of the data pipeline. These will include critical timelines, uptime requirements, data update frequency, data transformation, DevOps needs, and security, policy, or regulatory requirements by which a data pipeline must meet.
Principle 2: Build your team
The second principle to consider for pipeline development is build your team. This means ensuring you have the right people with the right skills available in the right places to develop, deploy, and maintain your data pipelines. After you have gathered your pipeline requirements, you can begin to develop a summary architecture that will be used to build and deploy your data pipelines. This will help you identify the human talent you will need to successfully build, deploy, and manage these data pipelines and identify any potential shortfalls that would require additional support from either third-party partners or new team members.
Not only do you need to ensure you have the right people and skill sets available in aggregate, but these individuals need to be effectively structured to empower them to maximize their abilities. This means developing team structures that are optimized for each team’s responsibilities and their ability to support adjacent teams as needed.
This also means developing processes that prevent blockers to technical development whenever possible, such as ensuring that teams have all of the appropriate permissions they need to move data from the original source to your cloud data warehouse without violating the concept of least privilege. Developers need access to the original data source (depending on your requirements and architecture) in addition to the destination data warehouse. Examples of this are ensuring that developers have access to develop and/or connect to a Salesforce Connected App or read access to specific Search Ads 360 data fields.
Principle 3: Minimize time to value
The third principle to consider for pipeline development is minimize time to value. This means considering the long-term maintenance burden of a data pipeline prior to developing and deploying it in addition to being able to deploy a minimum viable pipeline as quickly as possible. Generally speaking, we recommend the following approach to building data pipelines to minimize their maintenance burden: Write as little code as possible. Functionally, this can be implemented by:
1. Leveraging interface-based data ingestion products whenever possible. These products minimize the amount of code that requires ongoing maintenance and empower users who aren’t software developers to build data pipelines. They can also reduce development time for data pipelines, allowing them to be deployed and updated more quickly.
- Products like Google Data Transfer Service and Fivetran allow for managed data ingestion pipelines by any user to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, file systems, and other tooling. With little to no code required, these managed services enable you to connect your data warehouse to your sources quickly and easily.
- For workloads managed by ETL developers and data engineers, tools like Google Cloud’s Data Fusion provide an easy-to-use visual interface for designing, managing and monitoring advanced pipelines with complex transformations.
2. Whenever interface-based products or data connectors are insufficient, use pre-existing code templates. Examples of this include templates available for Dataflow that allow users to define variables and run pipelines for common data ingestion use cases, and the Public Datasets pipeline architecture that our Datasets team uses for onboarding.
3. If neither of these options are sufficient, utilize managed services to deploy code for your pipelines. Managed services, such as Dataflow or Dataproc, eliminate the operational overhead of managing pipeline configuration by automatically scaling pipeline instances within predefined parameters.
Principle 4: Increase data trust and transparency
The fourth principle to consider for pipeline development is increase data trust and transparency. For the purposes of this document, we define this as the process of overseeing and managing data pipelines across all tools. Numerous data ingestion pipelines that each leverage different tools or are not developed under a coordinated management plan can result in “tech sprawl”, which significantly increases the management overhead of data ingestion pipelines as the quantity of data pipelines increases. This becomes especially cumbersome if you are subject to service-level agreements, or legal, regulatory, or policy requirements for overseeing data pipelines. Preventing tech sprawl is, by far, the best strategy for dealing with it by developing streamlined pipeline management processes that automate reporting. Although this can theoretically be achieved by building all of your data pipelines using a single cloud-based product, we do not recommend doing so because it prevents you from taking advantage of features and cost optimizations that come with choosing the best product for your use case.
A monitoring service such as Google Cloud Monitoring Service or Splunk that automates metrics, events, and metadata collection from various products, including those hosted in on-premise and hybrid computing environments, can help you centralize reporting and monitoring of your data pipelines. A metadata management tool such as Google Cloud’s Data Catalog or Informatica’s Enterprise Data Catalog can help you better communicate the nuances of your data so users better understand which data resources are best fit for a given use case. This significantly reduces your pipeline’s governance burden by eliminating manual reporting processes that often result in inaccuracies or lagging updates.
Principle 5: Manage costs
The fifth principle to consider for pipeline development is manage costs. This encompasses both the cost of cloud resources and the staffing costs necessary to design, develop, deploy, and maintain your cloud resources. We believe that your goal should not necessarily be to minimize cost, but rather maximizing the value of your investment. This means maximizing the impact of every dollar spent by minimizing waste in cloud resource utilization and human time. There are several factors to consider when it comes to managing costs:
- Use the right tool for the job – Different data ingestion pipelines will have different requirements for latency, uptime, transformations, etc. Similarly, different data pipeline tools have different strengths and weaknesses. Choosing the right tool for each data pipeline can help your pipelines operate significantly more efficiently. This can reduce your overall cost, free up staffing time to focus on the most impactful projects, and make your pipelines much more efficient.
- Standardize resource labeling – Implement and utilize a consistent labeling schema across all tools and platforms to have the most comprehensive view of your organization’s spending. One example is requiring all resources to be labeled by the cost center or team at time of creation. Consistent labeling allows you to monitor your spend across different teams and calculate the overall value of your cloud spending.
- Implement cost controls – If available, leverage cost controls to prevent errors that result in unexpectedly large bills.
- Capture cloud spend – Capture your spend on all cloud resource utilization for internal analysis using a cloud data warehouse and a data visualization tool. Without it, you won’t understand the context of changes in cloud spend and how they correlate with changes in business.
- Make cost management everyone’s job – Managing costs should be part of the responsibilities of everyone who can create or utilize cloud resources. To do this well, we recommend making cloud spend reporting more transparent internally and/or implementing chargebacks to internal cost centers based on utilization.
Long-term, the increased granularity in cost reporting available within Google Cloud can help you better measure your key performance indicators. You can shift from cost-based reporting (i.e. – “We spent $X on BigQuery storage last month”) to value-based reporting (i.e. – “It costs $X to serve customers who bring in $Y revenue”).
To learn more about managing costs, check out Google Cloud’s “Understanding the principles of cost optimization” white paper.
Principle 6: Leverage continually improving services
The sixth principle is leverage continually improving services. Cloud services are consistently improving their performance and stability, even if some of these improvements are not obvious to users. These improvements can help your pipelines run faster, cheaper, and more consistently over time. You can take advantage of the benefits of these improvements by:
- Automating both your pipelines and pipeline management: Not only should data pipelines be automated, but almost all aspects of managing your pipelines can also be automated. This includes pipeline/data lineage tracking, monitoring, cost management, scheduling, access management and more. This helps reduce long-term operational costs of each data pipeline that can significantly alter your value proposition and prevent any manual configurations from negating the benefits of later product improvements.
- Minimizing pipeline complexity whenever possible: While ingestion pipelines are relatively easy to develop using UI-based or managed services, they also require continued maintenance as long as they are in use. The most easily maintained data ingestion pipelines are typically the ones that minimize complexity and leverage automatic optimization capabilities. Any transformation in a data ingestion pipeline is a manual optimization of the pipeline that may struggle to adapt or scale as the underlying services improve. You can minimize the need for such transformations by building ELT (extract, load, transform) pipelines rather than ETL (extract, transform, load) pipelines. This pushes transformations down to the data warehouse that is use a specifically optimized query engine to transform your data rather than manually configured pipelines.
Next steps
If you’re looking for more information about developing your cloud-based data platform, check out our Build a modern, unified analytics data platform whitepaper. You can also visit our data integration site to learn more and find ways to get started with your data integration journey.
Once you’re ready to begin building your data ingestion pipelines, learn more about how Cloud Data Fusion and Fivetran can help you make sure your pipelines address these principles.

3970
Of your peers have already listened to this podcast
23:38 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
How Apna is using data and AI to drive the gig economy in India
AirAsia needed a platform incorporating products that could capture, process, analyze, and report on data, while delivering value for money and meeting its speed and availability requirements. The airline also wanted to minimise infrastructure management and system administration demands on its technology team members.
The airline conducted a proof of concept and found Google Cloud Platform—including the Google BigQuery analytics data warehouse—was the best fit.
AirAsia was impressed by the ease and flexibility with which it could extract, transform, and load customer data from its systems, websites, and mobile applications into Google BigQuery for analysis. Reporting and dashboards were quickly and effectively delivered through Google Data Studio.
“With a minimal number of people involved, we can very quickly transform an idea or thought process into a deliverable. Prior to Google Cloud Platform, bringing those ideas to fruition would have been impossible,” says Nikunj Shanti, Chief Data and Digital Officer, AirAsia.
More Relevant Stories for Your Company

Uber’s Story of Scaling Their App with Millions of Concurrent Requests
Uber has millions of concurrent customers who use the platform to book rides and place food delivery orders, generating billions of database transactions per day. In just a click of a button, Uber captures users' intent which bases their fulfillment model to meet the customers' demand, and match it to

“It’s an Astonishing Difference”: What Data Operation Execs say About Google Cloud’s Data Warehouse
The popularity of meal kit delivery services has surged in recent years as consumer attitudes toward home cooking and grocery shopping have shifted. As a pioneer in the category, Blue Apron helps its customers create incredible home cooking experiences by sending culinary-driven recipes with high-quality ingredients and step-by-step instructions straight to customers’

Cloud Spanner Powers Vimeo to Deliver Consistent UX for across Content
Editor’s note: The video platform Vimeo leverages managed database services from Google Cloud to serve up billions of views around the world each day. Here’s how they deliver a consistent user experience across all their content. Vimeo is the world’s leading video software solution, powering hundreds of thousands of new uploads

Cloud Bigtable brings database stability and performance to Precognitive
At Precognitive, we were able to start with a blank technology slate to support our fraud detection software products. When we started building the initial version of our platform in 2017, we had some decisions to make: What coding language to use? What cloud infrastructure provider to choose? What database






