Editors note: Today’s post is from Neil Craig at the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), the national broadcaster of the United Kingdom. Neil is part of the BBC’s Digital Distribution team which is responsible for building the services such as the public-facing www bbc.co.uk and .com websites and ensuring they are able to scale and operate reliably. 

The BBC’s public-facing websites inform, educate, and entertain over 498 million adults per week across the world. Because breaking news is so unpredictable, we need a core content delivery platform that can easily scale in response to surges in traffic, which can be quite unpredictable.  

To this end, we recently rebuilt our log-processing infrastructure on a Google Cloud serverless platform. We’ve found that the new system, based on Cloud Storage, Eventarc, Cloud Run and BigQuery, enables us to provide a reliable and stable service without us having to worry about scaling up during busy times. We’re also able to save license fee payers money by operating the service more cost effectively than our previous architecture. Not having to manually manage the scale of major components of the stack has freed up our time, allowing us to spend it on using, rather than creating the data.

A log in time

To operate the site and ensure our services run smoothly we continually monitor Traffic Manager and CDN access logs. Our websites generate more than 3B log lines per day, and handle large data bursts during major news events; on a busy day our system supports over 26B log lines in a single day. 

As initially designed, we stored log data in a Cloud Storage bucket. But every time we needed to access that data, we had to download terabytes of logs down to a virtual machine (VM) with a large amount of attached storage, and use the ‘grep’ tool to search and analyze them. From beginning to end, this took us several hours. On heavy news days, the time lag made it difficult for the engineering team to do their jobs.

We needed a more efficient way to make this log data available, so we designed and deployed a new system that deals with logs and reacts to spikes more efficiently as they arrive, improving the timeliness of critical information significantly.

In this new system, we still leverage Cloud Storage buckets, but on arrival, each log generates an event using EventArc. That event triggers Cloud Run to validate, transform and enrich various pieces of information about the log file such as filename, prefix, and type, then processes it and outputs the processed data as a stream into BigQuery. This event-driven design allows us to process files quickly and frequently — processing a single log file typically takes less than a second. Most of the files that we feed into the system are small, fewer than 100 Megabytes, but for larger files, we automatically split those into multiple files and Cloud Run automatically creates additional parallel instances very quickly, helping the system scale almost instantly.

The nature of running a global website which provides news coverage means we see frequent, unpredictable large spikes of traffic. We learn from these and optimize our systems where necessary so we’re confident in the system’s ability to handle significant traffic. For example, around the time of the announcement of the Queen’s passing in September, we saw some huge traffic spikes. During the largest, within one minute, we went from running 150 – 200 container instances to over 1000…. and the infrastructure just worked. Because we engineered the log processing system to rely on the elasticity of a serverless architecture, we knew from the get-go that it would be able to handle this type of scaling.

Around the time of the announcement of the Queen’s passing in September, we saw some huge traffic spikes. During the largest, within one minute, we went from running 150 – 200 container instances to over 1000…. and the infrastructure just worked

Tweet this quote

Our initial concern about choosing serverless was cost. It turns out that using Cloud Run is significantly more cost-effective than running the number of VMs we would need for a system that could survive reasonable traffic spikes with a similar level of confidence.

Switching to Cloud Run also allows us to use our time more efficiently, as we no longer need to spend time managing and monitoring VM scaling or resource usage. We picked Cloud Run intentionally because we wanted a system that could scale well without manual intervention. As the digital distribution team, our job is not to do ops work on the underlying components of this system — we leave that to the specialist ops teams at Google.

Another conscious choice we made whilst rebuilding the system was to use the built-in service-to-service authentication in Google Cloud. Rather than implementing and maintaining the authentication mechanism ourselves, we add some simple configuration which instructs the client side to create and send a OIDC token for a service account we define and the server side to authenticate and authorize the client. Another example is pushing events into Cloud Run, where we can configure Cloud Run authorization to only accept events from specific EventArc triggers, so it is fully private.

Going forward, the new system has allowed us to make better use of our data safely. For example, BigQuery’s per-column permissions allow us to open up access to our logs to other engineering teams around the organization, without having to worry about sharing PII that’s restricted to approved users.

The goal of our team is to empower all teams within the BBC to get the content they want on the web when they want it, make it reliable, secure, and make sure it can scale. Google Cloud serverless products helped us to achieve these goals with relatively little effort and require significantly less management than previous generations of technology.

Modern developers worldwide have grown accustomed to the comfort of writing code, pushing to a remote Git repository and having that code be deployed at an accessible URL without having to worry about how it is deployed. This was a workflow popularized by Heroku years ago which brought joy and productivity to developers even if it did impose some loss of flexibility for operation teams.

To address that loss of flexibility when meeting security and integration requirements, Heroku introduced Private Spaces. Private Spaces provide network isolation from the internet since any application or datastore provisioned by Heroku is accessible to the internet by default.

Cloud Run is quickly becoming the “swiss army knife” of serverless here at Google Cloud and it’s a natural migration path for developers accustomed to Heroku. The fundamentals are all there:

• Continuously Deploy via Git push using open source Buildpacks or Dockerfiles
• Set CPU and Memory requirements for each instance
• Horizontally scalable apps that scale from zero to thousands of instances to meet traffic demands automatically

So while devs are kept happy, can Cloud Run do something for the Ops folks? Yes. Here are some things available right in the Cloud Run UI:

• Proper Secret Management with IAM based access control. No more setting secrets as environment variables.
• Traffic management between different revisions for blue-green or canary deployments.
• Define SLIs and SLOs with ease. Eg: 90% of requests have to be served under 200ms in a calendar month.
• Secure your service with tools such as Software Delivery Shield, Binary Authorization, and Cloud Armor. Definitely deserves its own blog post.

Recreating Private Spaces on Cloud Run

Let’s focus on network isolation now, let’s say you have an internet-facing app and a private backend API that talks to a private database. Simplest architecture ever, it conceptually looks a bit like this:

Let’s address the database first. If you want to use Postgres then Cloud SQL is most likely what you want, but do keep in mind that we have other datastores that speak Postgres such as AlloyDB and Spanner.

Cloud SQL allows you to create a Postgres instance that’s isolated from the internet by simply unchecking the Public IP checkbox and checking the Private IP checkbox. This will assign an IP address to your Postgres instance on your project’s network.

Once the DB is provisioned you’ll see the IP clearly listed, such as:

Of course there’s so much more to say about CloudSQL, to learn more please take a look at our documentation.

Ok now that you’ve dealt with Postgres, let’s address the private backend API on Cloud Run.

When creating a new Cloud Run service via the Google Cloud Console, Ingress can be limited to “Internal traffic only” so only traffic from internal sources, including your VPC, can access the service. In other words, the internet can not touch it.

As an additional level of security, it’s also possible to enforce that only requests from authorized users be served, In this case a “user” is most likely another service using its associated service account which will need the “roles/run.invoker” in order to call this service.

Now let’s make sure that our Backend API Service can reach the Postgres instance by configuring a VPC Connector. This will allow Cloud Run services to reach into the VPC and therefore, the internal IP for the Postgres instance.

Once the VPC Connector is created, you can associate it with a Cloud Run service.

Then it’s just a matter of configuring your code to use the Postgres instance’s private IP address. A good 12-Factor app friendly spot to do that is with a connection string in an environment variable as part of the Cloud Run service configuration. Better yet, as this may contain a DB password, you can use Secret Manager to mount this environment variable from an encrypted and protected secret.

Finally, let’s now set up that Front End Cloud Run service which will respond to requests from the internet, and securely communicate with the backend API service.

For the frontend service choose to “Allow all traffic” and also “Allow unauthenticated invocations” so anyone on the web can access our URL. We could of course choose the middle option and use Cloud Load Balancing in conjunction with Cloud Armor which provides defenses against DDoS and application attacks, and offers a rich set of WAF rules. However, let’s keep it simple for now.

Keep in mind that our Backend service will only accept requests from within our VPC network, and that we don’t have a private IP address for Cloud Run.

So let’s ensure that all egresses from our Frontend actually get routed to the VPC Connector, this way when our Frontend calls a Backend API via it’s URL endpoint, the Backend will receive the request from within the VPC and allow it in.

PS: If your Backend requires authentication don’t forget to create a Service Account for your Frontend Service and then give it the necessary role following a service-to-service auth pattern.

And that’s it. You now have an operationally acceptable private space like environment with an app composed of two Cloud Run services where the Backend service and Postgres instance are network isolated from the Internet. If after reading this blog you would like to get hands-on experience with the technologies mentioned above, then take a look at Google Cloud Skills Boost. There you will find learning paths, quests, and labs curated to boost your cloud skills in a particular area.

For example here’s a great lab that takes you through developing a REST API on Cloud Run using Go.

In 2020, many businesses across industries turned their focus and investments towards digital strategies. APIs being an integral part of every organization’s digital disruption, will grow in relevance throughout 2021. Read the report to gain more insights on driving API-led digital transformations and in-depth analysis of Google Cloud’s Apigee API Management Platform usage data, case studies and third-party surveys conducted with tech leaders.

The concept of “shifting left” has been widely promoted in the software development lifecycle. The concept is that introducing security earlier, or leftwards, in the development process will lead to fewer software-related security defects later, or rightwards, in production.

Shifting cloud security left can help identify potential misconfigurations earlier in the development cycle, which if unresolved can lead to security defects. Catching those misconfigurations early can improve the security posture of production deployments.

Why shifting security left matters

Google’s DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) highlights the importance of integrating security into DevOps in the 2016 State of DevOps Report. The report discussed the placement of security testing in the software development lifecycle. The survey found that most security testing and tool usage happened after the development of a release, rather than continuously throughout the development lifecycle. This led to increased costs and friction because remediating problems found in testing may involve big architectural changes and additional integration testing, as shown in Figure 1. For example, security defects in production can lead to GDPR violations, which can carry fines up to 4% of global annual revenue.

By inserting security testing into the development phase, we can identify security defects earlier and perform the appropriate remediation sooner. This results in fewer defects post-production and reduces remediation efforts and architectural changes. Figure 2 shows us that integrating security earlier in the SDLC results in overall decreases in security defects and associated remediation costs.

The 2021 State of DevOps Report expands the work of the 2016 report and advocates for integrating automated testing throughout the software development lifecycle. Automated testing is useful for continuously testing development code without the need for additional skills or intervention by the developer. Developers can continue to iterate quickly while other stakeholders can be confident that common defects are being identified and remediated.

From code to cloud

The DORA findings with regard to code security can also be applied to cloud infrastructure security. As more organizations deploy their workloads to the cloud, it’s important to test the security and configurations of cloud infrastructure. Misconfigurations in cloud resources can lead toward security incidents that could lead to data theft. Examples of such misconfigurations include overly permissive firewall rules, public IP addresses for VMs, or excessive Identity and Access Management (IAM) permissions on service accounts and storage buckets.

We can and should leverage different Google Cloud services to identify these misconfigurations early in the development process and prevent such errors from emerging in production to reduce the costs of future remediation, potential legal fines, and compromised customer trust.

The key tools in our toolshed are Security Command Center and Cloud Build. Security Command Center provides visibility into misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and threats within a Google Cloud organization. This information is critical when protecting your cloud infrastructure (such as virtual machines, containers, web applications) against threats, or identifying potential gaps from compliance frameworks (such as CIS Benchmarks, PCI-DSS, NIST 800-53, or ISO 27001.

Security Command Center further supports shifting security left by allowing visibility of security findings at the cloud project level for individual developers, while still allowing global visibility for Security Operations. Cloud Build provides for the creation of cloud-native CI/CD pipelines. You can insert custom health checks into a pipeline to evaluate certain conditions (such as security metrics) and fail the pipeline when irregularities are detected. We will now explore two use cases that take advantage of these tools.

Security Health Checker

Security Health Checker continuously monitors the security health of a Google Cloud project and promptly notifies project members of security findings. Figure 3 shows developers interacting with a Google Cloud environment with network, compute, and database components. Security Command Center is configured to monitor the health of the project.

When Security Command Center identifies findings, it sends them to a Cloud Pub/Sub topic. A Cloud Function then takes the findings published to that topic and sends them to a Slack channel monitored by infrastructure developers. Just like a spell checker providing quick feedback on misspellings, Security Health Checker provides prompt feedback on security misconfigurations in a Google Cloud project that could lead to deployment failures or post-production compromises. No additional effort is required on the part of developers.

Security Pipeline Checker

In addition to using Security Command Center for timely notification of security concerns during the development process, we can also integrate security checks into the CI/CD pipeline by using Security Command Center along with Cloud Build as shown in Figure 4.

The pipeline begins with a developer checking code into a git repository. This repository is mirrored to Cloud Source Repositories. A build trigger will begin the build process. The build pipeline will include a short waiting period of a few minutes to give Security Command Center a chance to identify security vulnerabilities. A brief delay may appear undesirable at first, but the analysis that takes place during that interval can result in the reduction of security defects post-production.

At the end of the waiting period, a Cloud Function serving as a Security Health Checker will evaluate the findings from Security Command Center (Connector 1 in Figure 4). If the validator determines that unacceptable security findings exist, the validator will inject a failure indication into the pipeline to terminate the build process (Connector 2 in Figure 4). Developers have visibility into the failure triggers and remediate them before successfully deploying code to production. This is in contrast to the findings in the 2016 State of DevOps Report wherein organizations that didn’t integrate security into their DevOps processes spent 50% more time remediating security issues than those who “shifted left” on security.

Closing thoughts

DORA’s 2016 State of DevOps report called out the need for “shifting left” with security, introducing security earlier in the development process to identify security vulnerabilities early to reduce mitigation efforts post-production. The report also advocated for automated testing throughout the software development lifecycle.

We looked at two ways of achieving these objectives in Google Cloud. The Security Health Checker provides feedback to developers using Security Command Center and Slack to notify developers of security findings as they pursue their development activities. The Security Pipeline Checker uses Security Command Center as part of a Cloud Build pipeline to terminate a build pipeline if vulnerabilities are identified during the build process. To implement the Security Heath Checker and the Security Pipeline Checker, check out the GitHub repository. We hope these examples will help you to “shift left” using Google Cloud services. Happy coding!

This article was co-authored with Jason Bisson, Bakh Inamov, Jeff Levne, Lanre Ogunmola, Luis Urena, and Holly Willey, Security & Compliance Specialists at Google Cloud.