Discover Effingo: Google’s Solution to Moving Data at Massive Scale

1361
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Every hour of every day, Google moves a lot of data around the world. But how? With the Effingo (Latin for ‘to duplicate’ or ‘copy’) data copying service, a Google-only service that moves data internally and on Google Cloud customers’ behalf.
As a Google Cloud customer perhaps you move data with Storage Transfer Service, a managed transfer option that provides out-of-the-box security, reliability, and performance, that eliminates the need to optimize and maintain scripts, and handle retries. Storage Transfer Service is useful for consolidating data from separate projects, to move data into a backup location, or to change the location of your data.
Likewise, Google’s internal services need very similar functionality to manage their data. This includes data that is in charge of the ecosystem of Google Cloud services, such as BigQuery and Cloud Spanner.
Effingo solves a challenging problem of data movement at a global scale. It supports a wide range of workloads with different traffic characteristics and different requirements for data replication, durability, and latency. In this article we will explore the main motivations behind data movement and solutions to core infrastructure problems that we face when copying exabytes of data on a daily basis.
Why move data in the first place?
But first, let’s think about why you even want to move or geographically distribute your data.
For one thing, you want to replicate your data for durability and reliability. You definitely don’t want to keep a single copy of your data. In the end, we’re talking about a file that is stored on a hard drive. Any hard drive can fail at any point. For this reason, keeping copies of your data in different locations helps ensure that at any point of time there is a copy of your file that you can read from. Moreover, these locations should be geographically distant from each other to avoid even temporary data loss due to natural disasters, network cuts, and other incidents that can impact a local area.
Second, you want your data to be close to your users to reduce latency. You want to serve data with minimal delay to give a great user experience. In many cases, delays caused by data transfers from remote locations can spoil the usability of your application or create the perception that your service doesn’t work. According to Google research, 53% of mobile users abandon sites that take over 3 seconds to load. There are other consequences of lack of data proximity: for example, transferring data from distant locations wastes network resources, which can have a negative impact on the environment. Google has been carbon-neutral for our operations since 2007, and we have matched 100% of the electricity consumption of our operations with renewable energy purchases annually since 2017, but we aim higher: Our goal is to run all our data centers and offices on carbon-free energy, 24/7, by 2030.
The third reason to geographically distribute your data is to balance storage capacity between clusters. This reduces the cost of storing data because it enables us to increase the overall capacity of our data centers and use computation power in less loaded clusters. We can then limit the amount of wasted resources and use otherwise idle hardware. This is especially relevant for batch processing and storing cold data where the exact storage location is not that important.
What are the challenges?
Operating at such a large scale as Google makes data movement a challenging problem for several reasons. Here are a few examples.
Data must be secure and consistent at its destination. Achieving this is complex. For example, to copy a file from one location to another, you need the following: throughput to read and write to disks, network capacity to transfer bytes between data centers, and compute resources to instrument the whole operation.
Considering the volume of data that Google operates on, high and predictable throughput is one of the key features of a copy service at scale. It is typical to transfer terabytes of data per second, and so it’s essential to have a scalable service that can handle traffic with sometimes rapidly changing patterns. It poses a further question: how to run such a service and still be resource efficient?
Finally, it’s crucial to ensure high system availability. Google infrastructure is dynamic and copying data between any two clusters may behave differently at different points of time. Effingo needs to be resilient to cluster turndowns, network bottlenecks, rapid changes in resource demands and capacity, and so on.
How do we solve (some) of these problems?
One of the core use cases for data movement is replication. If you want to ensure that your data is reliable, you want to keep more than one copy, ideally in different locations, to be less prone to data loss.
Let’s consider the following example. You have a file in cluster A, and you want to make copies in destinations B – G.

In the simplistic approach, you would start copying to all destinations in parallel.

Unfortunately, it is highly inefficient to replicate your file this way. This solution doesn’t scale and requires significant investment in infrastructure.
If you consider the cost of network infrastructure, moving data across the ocean is an expensive operation. Effingo creates data transfer plans that reduce the volume of data to transfer across the ocean. If possible, it reuses already replicated data as a new source.
To create data transfer plans Effingo needs to know alternative data sources and be aware of the network topology.
If it goes to the alternative sources, Effingo stores a recent history of transferred files together with their metadata and time-bound permissions to access the files. Whenever a new copy is issued, Effingo checks whether there were copies of the original file that could serve as the same source but in the alternative location. Worth noting is that Effingo is very strict in verifying that both files — the requested source file and the alternative transfer file — are indeed the same to follow high security standards. Effingo not only checks whether the same user issued a copy from the same source but also if file properties including checksum, ciphertext checksum, mtime and several others match.
Once Effingo knows the source files and their alternative sources, it creates a transfer plan over the Google network. Effingo has a model of the network in the form of a graph where each location is a node and each edge is a weighted link between each node. For each copy Effingo creates a Minimum Spanning Tree over such a graph, which serves as an input to the transfer engine. Thanks to this approach we can select a plan that is optimal for each copy.
In the next example, we show a more efficient approach. Effingo first makes an expensive copy to a remote location and then uses it as a new source. For instance, Effingo first copies a file from the US (source A) to Europe (destination C) and then uses the Europe-based file as a copy source for copies on the same continent. Note that Effingo never stores files in temporary locations for optimization purposes – the service only uses locations explicitly requested by our users.

In addition to resource efficiency, the main challenge is to ensure high throughput of data transfer. We solve this problem by applying several approaches that address different problems that may arise.
As described above, our customers’ workloads exhibit a range of different traffic patterns, which results in dynamic changes in capacity on each network link. For this reason, Effingo not only needs to respond to altering resource availability, but also to ensure user fairness in such conditions. In other words, Effingo wants all copy operations to progress while using resources in the best possible way. To achieve this, it uses sophisticated parallelism controls. These controls scale the service up to meet increased demand and limit service capacity if there is service overload, performance degradation, or resource waste.
Further, Effingo must be very resilient and react quickly to errors. On the file level, the service extensively uses retries for transient failures and aborts transfers quickly if it detects non-retryable errors. Effingo uses metrics, logs, and other observability signals to adjust data transfers when needed. For example, it can detect that copies from a specific source are slow and there is another file replica available. Effingo then reconfigures the copy operation to use the other replica to complete the data move.
Data movement at global scale is hard
Hopefully at this point you have a better understanding of why moving data is a challenging problem for infrastructure that operates at Google’s global scale. Effingo supports a range of services that run on Google infrastructure, including Google Cloud services and many internal Google services. While moving data at large scale requires a lot of attention to resource usage and resilience to support high throughput, there is good news: We keep working on this problem and make our infrastructure better every day, so you can run your business on Google Cloud and all data movement is transparent to you.
Why–and How–You Should Migrate Oracle Workloads to Google Cloud

3962
Of your peers have already read this article.
1:20 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
If you are like many of your peers you are looking to Google Cloud to reduce overheads, drive innovation, and agility with a wide variety of databases for your Oracle workloads. From Bare Metal Solution to cloud-native databases, Google Cloud offers the infrastructure to meet your needs.
The Benefits
Optimizing your Oracle workloads with Google Cloud solutions has a number of benefits.
Dramatically reduce TCO: Reduce up-front hardware, software, and maintenance costs. Migrating Oracle workloads to Google Cloud could result in up to 78% in TCO savings.
High scale and high availability: Mission-critical applications need dependable databases that scale with your business. Google Cloud offers SLA-backed databases to protect your apps.
Simplify operation: Reduce data center and database management by leveraging managed infrastructure and fully managed database services.
Migration Strategies
Google Cloud provides multiple strategies for your specific migration journey to help you with licensing, maintenance cost, and manageability.
Rehost: To migrate Oracle workloads with specific configurations, Google Cloud offers Bare Metal Solution, where you can simply lift and shift your workloads. Bare Metal Solution provides hardware, hardware support, and integrated billing and support. This infrastructure is connected with a highly resilient interconnect and connects to all native Google Cloud services with less than 2ms latency.
Replatform: Keep your core application code and migrate to compatible platforms to help reduce licensing fees and maintenance costs. You can migrate to an open source database such as Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL that has a certain amount of compatibility with PL/SQL and stored procedure. You can also offload data analytics-centric workloads to SQL-compatible data warehousing solutions like BigQuery.
Rewrite: Rewrite your application to take full advantage of cloud-native databases. If your application requires a relational database with global scalability, you can migrate to Cloud Spanner, which provides scalability with industry-leading high availability of 99.999% SLA.
How Kinguin Notched Up Shopping Experience with Google Recommendations AI

6465
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Over 2.14 billion people worldwide are expected to buy online this year, according to Statista. Online retail sales will account for 22% of all purchases by 2023. But in a competitive retail landscape, positive interactions can mean the difference between a sale and an abandoned shopping cart.
One of the leading global marketplaces – Kinguin.net is a haven for gamers. Their bustling ecommerce business conducts over 500,000 new transactions monthly. Users will encounter over 50,000 unique digital products, from video games, gift cards, in-game items to computer software and services. With over 10 million registered users, Kinguin improved their experience by helping users find items quickly and deliver service at scale.
Helping customers find what they want, fast
Because of Kinguin’s high volume of users—both buyers and sellers—and breadth of digital products, browsing and shopping can be challenging. “Customers shop online for choice and convenience, but it can sometimes be overwhelming. We want anyone who shops at Kinguin to find what they are looking for quickly and easily,” says Viktor Romaniuk Wanli, Kinguin CEO and Founder.
Today’s retailers know that creating personalized shopping experiences is crucial for establishing and maintaining customer loyalty. Kinguin discovered their users were getting a rather standard retail experience. They wondered how they could offer them a more tailored, personalized experience.
They knew product recommendations were a great way to personalize experiences because they help customers discover products that match their tastes and preferences. But it’s not that easy to recommend products. Various shifting factors make recommendations much more complex:
- Customer behavior. Understanding customers is tough. How do you recommend something to a cold start user who’s never been to your site before? What happens when their behavior changes?
- Omnichannel context. According to Harvard Business Review, 73% of all customers use many channels when they buy. What happens when they go from desktop to mobile or from social media shopping to a proprietary app?
- Product data challenges. How do you recommend new products within a large catalog of items? What if your product data has sparse labeling or unstructured metadata?
Data wasn’t a problem for Kinguin. They had data orders, history, wishlists, and could collect events based on their platform interactions. It was the machine learning model expertise they lacked. So rather than building their own solution, they determined it was more cost effective for them to find a reliable partner. It was also essential that the solution integrated easily with Kubernetes, which enabled their global network.
With these considerations in mind, they applied for the Google Recommendations AI beta program. Kinguin became the first gaming e-commerce platform in Europe to use Recommendations AI when it launched in 2020.
Pro gamer move: using a fully managed AI service
Google Recommendations AI uses algorithms to deliver highly personalized suggestions tailored to a customer’s preferences. Google Cloud based these algorithms on the same research that powers models by YouTube search and Google Shopping. Algorithms are always being tuned and adjusted to focus on individuals themselves—not just items.
Many shopping AIs rely on manually provisioning infrastructure and training machine learning models. Instead, Recommendations AI’s deep learning models use item and user metadata to gain insights. It processes Kinguin’s thousands of products at scale, iterating in real time. First, Kinguin pieces together a customer’s history and shopping journey. Then, using Recommendations AI, they can serve up personalized products—even for long-tail products and cold-start users.
By leveraging internal tools, Kinguin didn’t need to start implementation from scratch. After a few trial sessions with Google Cloud engineers, they got started right away. Due to the fast-paced nature of a marketplace—i.e., price changes, out-of-stock items—Kinguin needed their recommendations to be as close to real time as possible. They used internal event buses to stream events and their product catalog directly to the recommendations API.
Kinguin rolled out in high-traffic areas, including their home page, product page, and category pages. They analyzed heat maps and scroll maps to figure out where to test placements. They also experimented with different recommendation models such as “recently bought together” and “you may like.” Engineers also factored in where they were implementing the models. For example, the “others you might like” model would fit best on the homepage, while “frequently bought together” made sense at checkout.
Understanding how product recommendations influence financials is critical for demonstrating the impact of personalization. Using BigQuery, Kinguin could analyze different cost projection models. BigQuery helped them dig into specific financial data to understand their margins and revenue gains.
Playing to win: enhanced customer experience
Since adopting Recommendations AI, Kinguin has improved both customer experience and satisfaction. Search times have shortened by 20 seconds. Additionally, their average cart value has increased by 5 EUR. Conversion rates have quadrupled since the outset. Click-thru rates have doubled, increasing by 2.16 on product pages and 2.8 times on recommendations pages.
“Google Recommendations AI has helped us evolve our service, increase customer loyalty and satisfaction. It has also contributed to a significant rise in sales,” says Wanli. Kinguin is already thinking about other ways of enhancing user experiences with recommendations. Ideas include their checkout process, other landing pages, and email marketing.
Kinguin’s journey with Google Cloud shows how companies can leverage AI to optimize sales and deliver high-performing, low-latency recommendations to any customer touchpoint.
Learn more about Recommendations AI and Google Cloud AI and machine learning solutions.
Updating Twitter’s Ad Engagement Analytics Platform for the Modern Age

3111
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
As part of the daily business operations on its advertising platform, Twitter serves billions of ad engagement events, each of which potentially affects hundreds of downstream aggregate metrics. To enable its advertisers to measure user engagement and track ad campaign efficiency, Twitter offers a variety of analytics tools, APIs, and dashboards that can aggregate millions of metrics per second in near-real time.
In this post, you’ll get details on how the Twitter Revenue Data Platform engineering team, led by Steve Niemitz, migrated their on-prem architecture to Google Cloud to boost the reliability and accuracy of Twitter’s ad analytics platform.
Deciding to migrate
Over the past decade, Twitter has developed powerful data transformation pipelines to handle the load of its ever-growing user base worldwide. The first deployments for those pipelines were initially all running in Twitter’s own data centers. The input data streamed from various sources into Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) as LZO-compressed Thrift files in an Elephant Bird container format. The data was then processed and aggregated in batches by Scalding data transformation pipelines. Then, aggregation results were output into Manhattan, Twitter’s homegrown distributed key-value store, for serving. Additionally, a streaming system using Twitter’s homegrown systems Eventbus (a messaging tool built on top of DistributedLog), Heron (a stream processing engine), and Nighthawk (a sharded Redis deployment) powered the real-time analytics that Twitter had to provide, filling the gap between the current time and the last batch run.
While this system consistently sustained massive scale, its original design and implementation was starting to reach some limits. In particular, some parts of the system that had grown organically over the years were difficult to configure and extend with new features. Some intricate, long-running jobs were also unreliable, leading to sporadic failures. The legacy end-user serving system was very expensive to run and couldn’t support large queries.
To accommodate for the projected growth in user engagement over the next few years and streamline the development of new features, the Twitter Revenue Data Platform engineering team decided to rethink the architecture and deploy a more flexible and scalable system in Google Cloud.
Platform modernization: First iteration
In the middle of 2017, Steve and his team tackled the first redesign iteration of its advertising data platform modernization, leading to Twitter’s collaboration with Google Cloud.
At first, the team left the data aggregation legacy Scalding pipelines unchanged and continued to run them in Twitter’s data centers. But the batch layer’s output was switched from Manhattan to two separate storage locations in Google Cloud:
- BigQuery—Google’s serverless and highly scalable data warehouse, to support ad-hoc and batch queries.
- Cloud Bigtable—Google’s low-latency, fully managed NoSQL database, to serve as a back end for online dashboards and consumer APIs.
The output aggregations from the Scalding pipelines were first transcoded from Hadoop sequence files to Avro on-prem, staged in four-hour batches to Cloud Storage, and then loaded into BigQuery. A simple pipeline deployed on Dataflow, Google Cloud’s fully managed streaming and batch analytics service, then read the data from BigQuery and applied some light transformations. Finally, the Dataflow pipeline wrote the results into Bigtable.
The team built a new query service to fetch aggregated values from Bigtable and process end-user queries. They deployed this query service in a Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster in the same region as the Bigtable instance to optimize for data access latency.
Here’s a look at the architecture:

This first iteration already brought many important benefits:
- It de-risked the overall migration effort, letting Twitter avoid migrating both the aggregation business logic and storage at the same time.
- The end-user serving system’s performance improved substantially. Thanks to Bigtable’s linear scalability and extremely low latency for data access, the serving system’s P99 latencies decreased from 2+ seconds to 300ms.
- Reliability increased significantly. The team now rarely, if ever, gets paged for the serving system anymore.
Platform modernization: second iteration
With the new serving system in place, in 2019 the Twitter team began to redesign the rest of the data analytics pipeline using Google Cloud technologies. The redesign sought to solve several existing pain points:
- Because the batch and streaming layers ran on different systems, much of the logic was duplicated between systems.
- While the serving system had been moved into the cloud, the existing pain points of the Hadoop aggregation process still existed.
- The real-time layer was expensive to run and required significant operational attention.
With these pain points in mind, the team began evaluating technologies that could help solve them. They considered several open-source stream processing frameworks initially: Apache Flink, Apache Kafka Streams, and Apache Beam. After evaluating all possible options, the team chose Apache Beam for a few key reasons:
- Beam’s built-in support for exactly-once operations at extremely large scale across multiple clusters.
- Deep integration with other Google Cloud products, such as Bigtable, BigQuery, and Pub/Sub, Google Cloud’s fully managed, real-time messaging service.
- Beam’s programming model, which unifies batch and streaming and lets a single job operate on either batch inputs (Cloud Storage), or streaming inputs (Pub/Sub).
- The ability to deploy Beam pipelines on Dataflow’s fully managed service.
The combination of Dataflow’s fully managed approach and Beam’s comprehensive feature set let Twitter simplify the structure of its data transformation pipeline, as well as increase overall data processing capacity and reliability.
Here’s what the architecture looks like after the second iteration:

In this second iteration, the Twitter team re-implemented the batch layer as follows: Data is first staged from on-prem HDFS to Cloud Storage. A batch Dataflow job then regularly loads the data from Cloud Storage, processes the aggregations, and dual-writes the results to BigQuery for ad-hoc analysis and Bigtable for the serving system.
The Twitter team also deployed an entirely new streaming layer in Google Cloud. For data ingestion, an on-prem service now pushes two different streams of Avro-formatted messages to Pub/Sub. Each message contains a bundle of multiple raw events and affects between 100 and 1,000 aggregations. This leads to more than 3 million aggregations per second performed by four Dataflow jobs (J0-3 in the diagram above). All Dataflow jobs share the same topology, although each job consumes messages from different streams or topics.
One stream, which contains critical data, enters the system at a rate of 200,000 messages per second and is partitioned in two separate Pub/Sub topics. A Dataflow job (J3 in the diagram) consumes those two streams, performs 400,000 aggregations per second, and outputs the results to a table in Bigtable.
The other stream, which contains less critical but higher volume data, enters the system at a rate of around 80,000 messages per second and is partitioned into six separate topics. Three Dataflow jobs (J0, J1, and J2) share the processing of this larger stream, with each of them handling two of the available six topics in parallel, then also outputting the results to a table in Bigtable. In total, those three jobs process over 2 million aggregations/second.
Partitioning the high-volume stream into multiple topics offers a number of advantages:
- The partitioning is organized by applying a hash function on the aggregation key and then dividing the function’s result by the number of available partitions (in this case, six). This guarantees that any per-key grouping operation in downstream pipelines is scoped to a single partition, which is required for consistent aggregation results.
- When deploying updates to the Dataflow jobs, admins can drain and relaunch each job individually in sequence, allowing the remaining pipelines to continue uninterrupted and minimizing impact on the end users.
- The three jobs can each handle two topics without issue currently, and there is still room to scale horizontally up to six jobs if needed. The number of topics (six) is arbitrary, but is a good balance at the moment based on current needs and potential spikes in traffic.
To assist with job configuration, Twitter initially considered using Dataflow’s template system, a powerful feature that enables the encapsulation of Dataflow pipelines into repeatable templates that can be configured at runtime. However, since Twitter needed to deploy jobs with topologies that might change over time, the team decided instead to implement a custom declarative system where developers can specify different parameters for their jobs in a pystachio DSL: tuning parameters, data sources to operate on, sink tables for aggregation outputs, and the jobs’ source code location. A new major version of Dataflow templates, called Flex Templates, will remove some of the previous limitations with the template architecture and allow any Dataflow job to be templatized.
For job orchestration, the Twitter team built a custom command line tool that processes the configuration files to call the Dataflow API and submit jobs. The tool also allows developers to submit a job update by automatically performing a multi-step process, like this:
- Drain the old job:
- Call the Dataflow API to identify which data sources are used in the job (for example, a Pub/Sub topic reader).
- Initiate a drain request.
- Poll the Dataflow API for the watermark of the identified sources until the maximum watermark is hit, which indicates that the draining operation is complete.
- Launch the new job with the updated code.
This simple, flexible, and powerful system allows developers to focus on their data transformation code without having to be concerned about job orchestration or the underlying infrastructure details.
Looking ahead
Six months after fully transitioning its ad analytics data platform to Google Cloud, Twitter has already seen huge benefits. Twitter’s developers have gained in agility as they can more easily configure existing data pipelines and build new features much faster. The real-time data pipeline has also greatly improved its reliability and accuracy, thanks to Beam’s exactly-once semantics and the increased processing speed and ingestion capacity enabled by Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and Bigtable.
Twitter engineers have enjoyed working with Dataflow and Beam for several years now, since version 2.2, and plan to continue expanding their usage. Most importantly, they’ll soon merge the batch and streaming layers into a single, authoritative streaming layer.
Throughout this project, the Twitter team collaborated very closely with Google engineers to exchange feedback and discuss product enhancements. We look forward to continuing this joint technical effort on several ongoing large-scale cloud migration projects at Twitter. Stay tuned for more updates!
How TapClicks’ Google Cloud Migration Makes Life Easy for Marketers

8574
Of your peers have already read this article.
2:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Editor’s note: In this blog post we learn how TapClicks migrated to Google Cloud to offer their marketing customers a unified platform for data management, operations, insights, and analysis.
TapClicks is a smart marketing cloud, powered by data, that unifies our customer’s marketing. By choosing to migrate our core applications last year to Google Cloud, we cut costs, solved data-sharing concerns for our customers, and opened our stack up to a new ecosystem of possibilities.
The core problem that we’re solving for our customers is how to manage their marketing infrastructures data and operations. Life isn’t easy for marketers now. There are 7,000 different vendors servicing this space today – creating much complexity between digital agencies, media, and brands. Marketers face challenges in navigating all of these systems, logging in and out, understanding pacing goals, and managing the flow of marketing data so they can analyze and report internally as well as to their clients at scale.
We unify omnichannel campaign data (250 API connectors and 6000 Smart Connectors ™ ) from a plethora of marketing sources on an automated data warehousing solution, creating simplicity for organizations. Over 4,000 agencies, media companies, and brands use our Marketing Operations and Data Management Platform, which imports data at scale and creates an automatic data warehouse on Google Cloud. Teams can also leverage TapClicks, like our world class Facebook connector, to import data directly into Google Data Studios. Beyond importing and storing, we also provide data exporting to other Google solutions like Google Data Studio and Google Sheets. We also create interactive dashboards that let stakeholders and clients analyze their data, as well as automated, multi-channel reports that go out to clients at specified times. So channel comparisons, optimizations, attribution, and calculations are easily performed. Some of our customers are able to generate hundreds of thousands of individual reports and dashboards for their clients.
Although we may be best known for our reporting and analytics, we also empower teams managing the marketing operations workflow from customers and internal stakeholders, especially at scale. Our user-friendly, configurable system helps manage their orders and campaigns. Through automation of this process, we deliver tremendous amounts of efficiency, time saving, cost savings, and reduction of errors. The combination of these solutions makes up our unified platform, with additional capabilities like marketing intelligence that offers competitive and brand-level analysis. This is a disruptive solution in use by all leading media companies, agencies and many brands.
Partnering for possibilities
We faced a few challenges with our original tech stack, which included a mix of the leader in web services revenue, leaders in high performance data warehousing, as well as vendors on bare metal servers.
- One challenge was around costs, which were growing.
- Second, many of our customers work with multiple brands, and are very hesitant to share their data with the leader in web services, who’s often viewed as their competitor.
- Third, these vendors are more focused on their own revenue rather than a true long term partnership that would enable their customers to enjoy similar success as they have experienced.
When looking at other cloud providers, Google Cloud emerged for us as the front runner. They were competitive on costs, and their native Kubernetes support was superior— a big selling point for our DevOps team. There’s also a movement in the marketing and advertising industry away from AWS toward Google Cloud because of the data-sharing concern. Finally, most of our customers are already using Google Cloud tools, so there’s brand recognition and familiarity there, and easier integrations with their own systems.
Migrating to Google Cloud
Our migration, which took about five months, involved moving a significant chunk of our infrastructure, including our core applications, using Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). In our legacy architecture, each of our clients was assigned to one of our virtual machines (VMs), and there was a lot of unused capacity because we had to provision for the max usage. We appreciated GKE’s cloud native capabilities, especially autoscaling, a huge benefit for our web application. We have varying usage patterns during the day, and though our application is mostly used during business hours, there are also days in the month of higher usage, and autoscaling saves us time and costs. GKE also makes deployments much easier, and we anticipate a lot of benefits there for our developer environments. We’ve moved some of our microservices into GKE and plan to move more in the future. All in all, we were able to migrate our core products and the bulk of our AWS spend successfully to Google Cloud.
We also moved from our other vendors Relational Database Service (RDS) to running MySQL on our own VMs on Google Cloud, which gives us more flexibility in terms of settings and fine tuning. We’re still trying to find the best mix as we’re modernizing our infrastructure, and we took this opportunity to migrate from MySQL 5.7 to 8.0.
Our next stage is exploring more of the capabilities and services of Google Cloud, including BigQuery, which we’re considering for our own data warehouse. The fact that we could also run Snowflake on Google Cloud, if needed, was another selling point for our migration.
We’re especially interested in BigQuery ML’s machine learning and natural language processing capabilities, which enabled better predictive insights. Our customers want insights from their campaigns— which are working, which are paying off, where should they invest next? Using our platform, they’re looking not only to generate reporting, but also identify opportunities to improve campaign performance. We plan to use AI and ML to improve those capabilities, so that our customers can seamlessly unlock insight and intelligence from their marketing data and campaigns.
Double-clicking on Google Cloud
For us, being able to deeply leverage and partner with Google Cloud to deliver those solutions on a single stack is critical, and we think our customers will love it. We see TapClicks and Google Cloud partnering at a level beyond what you typically see in a cloud provider relationship. Already, fifty percent of our company is working with various Google Cloud solutions, and we envision TapClicks and Google Cloud as extensions of each other, providing a single, powerful platform solution.
Google Cloud understands the partnership concept, and their team was able to shine a light on their services and what they could bring to the table. Compared to our previous experiences, dealing with the Google Cloud team has been a true pleasure. Now that we’ve migrated, we’re ready to take our next steps into the services available to us in the Google Cloud ecosystem, and the problems we’ll continue to solve for our customers. Learn more about TapClicks and BigQuery ML.
The Fantastic Story of How BMG Enables a Micropayments Strategy So Music Artists Get Paid

7461
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
The music industry is rapidly changing. Only 20 years ago, the availability of music and the infrastructure that was required to make an album a sales success were incredibly complex and expensive. With the decline of physical sales and a fundamental shift to digital, music streaming now accounts for more than half of all sales globally.
At the same time, technology has democratized music-making; in many ways, it has made the musical landscape more diverse. Artists can upload their music with the click of a button. But while it’s easier for creators to share their songs with audiences, getting paid has become more fragmented.
Although music is booming, people no longer buy it outright. Instead, listeners download music digitally or subscribe to streaming services to have their libraries with them at all times. To monetize digital content effectively, artists need to know when, where, and how often their songs are played on each service. To help them navigate this complicated royalties landscape and maximize their profits, Berlin-based international music company BMG provides customized, transparent, and fair services to songwriters and artists.
With publishing and recording divisions under one roof, the subsidiary of international media giant Bertelsmann works with both emerging artists and established stars, including John Legend, Kylie Minogue, Mick Jagger, and Keith Richards. With the MyBMG web and mobile application, clients can view and analyze their royalty details in real time and collect payment. When a new record is released, BMG uses data to maximize its impact and revenue for its creators.
“We make sure that everyone who uses our clients’ music knows who needs to be paid the associated royalties, then we collect these royalties and share them out quickly and transparently,” explains Sebastian Hentzschel, Chief Information Officer at BMG. “When our artists release new music, we make sure that it’s marketed and promoted effectively around the world.”
“We needed a scalable solution for our royalty workloads that was intuitive for our developers. We also wanted a partner, not a client-vendor relationship. With autoscaling via BigQuery, excellent customer support, and a clean and simple user interface, Google Cloud ticks every box for us.”
—Gaurav Mittal, Vice President Group Technology, BMG
Getting up to speed with a new way of paying artists
In this digital world, artists aren’t just paid every time a fan buys an album—they’re paid a small amount, or royalty, for each song downloaded or streamed by a listener. So, when the industry shifted to digital, the volume of data that BMG needed to handle grew exponentially. “One CD sale is equivalent to about 1,500 streamed songs or plays,” says Gaurav Mittal, Vice President Group Technology at BMG. “That means IT departments have to process 1,500 times the amount of data to calculate payments for artists, and this makes scalable micropayment processing very important.”
Until 2019, BMG’s infrastructure was entirely hosted on-premises. Hardware limitations made it challenging to scale on-demand, making it harder to handle the data peaks that royalty processing can bring. “With our on-premises infrastructure, we were going to hit a ceiling in a few years,” says Gaurav. “We still managed to process royalty payments for our clients, but it was increasingly time consuming and expensive. To keep focusing on our clients, rather than our infrastructure, we decided to migrate to Google Cloud.”
From the outset, Gaurav and his team had a clear vision for the partnership: “Most importantly, we needed a scalable solution for our royalty workloads that was intuitive for our developers. We also wanted a partner, not a client-vendor relationship,” he says. “With autoscaling via BigQuery, excellent customer support, and a clean and simple user interface, Google Cloud ticks every box for us.”
Keeping artists happy with business-as-usual payouts during migration
To move applications to the cloud while keeping payment cycles on track for its artists, BMG teamed up with Google Cloud partner Rackspace Technology. “We selected Rackspace Technology because it combines strong technical muscle and a global footprint, with the customer service of a local boutique firm,“ shares Gaurav.
BMG’s own technology team put together the outline for the Google Cloud architecture, which they passed on to Rackspace Technology for optimizations and the ultimate stamp of approval. Whenever Gaurav and his developers needed support, Rackspace Technology was ready to go. “So far, we’ve migrated 17 applications successfully, and Rackspace Technology has been 100% spot-on with each suggestion,” says Gaurav. “I can’t recall a single flaw in a Rackspace Technology-approved architecture, and that really says something.”
When BMG began its migration in August 2019, the team developed an ambitious two-year plan. Only 14 months later, however, the project is more than 75% complete. Among the solutions that BMG is using today are Cloud Storage to securely store 130 TB of data, and Cloud SQL as its standard database technology. The web applications run on Compute Engine, App Engine, and Google Kubernetes Engine.
“After successfully moving a few applications, it was clear that with the strong teamwork of BMG and Rackspace Technology, together with the ease of use of Google Cloud, we could speed up the project without sacrificing quality,” says Gaurav. “We’re set to complete our migration six months before schedule, helping us to quickly move out of our hybrid environment.”
“Our income-tracking teams are very savvy on the data, and the simplicity of Google Cloud empowers them to self-serve analytics, rather than wait for IT. Our teams are much more productive.”
—Gaurav Mittal, Vice President Group Technology at BMG
Royalty reporting and processing with BigQuery and Dataproc
So far, all of BMG’s critical workloads are up and running on Google Cloud. Royalty calculations, for example, which require incredible processing power and the collection of many micropayments to ensure full and timely payout, run entirely on Dataproc with output stored on BigQuery for downstream integration and reporting.
Enabling more harmonious workflows through self-serve analytics
As the new beating heart of BMG’s royalty reporting, BigQuery changed the rhythm of collaboration company-wide. In the past, income tracking teams had to contact IT departments if they needed deeper data insights for their work. By integrating Data Catalog with BigQuery, BMG has made the data more accessible to all teams. This helps them detect missing income and new revenue streams independently, maximizing profits for artists.
“Our income-tracking teams are very savvy on the data, and the simplicity of Google Cloud empowers them to self-serve analytics, rather than wait for IT,” says Gaurav. “Our teams are much more productive.”
“Google Cloud enables us to be more client focused and deliver better features faster. We believe it’s just the beginning. We offer rights and royalty services for music publishing, recorded music, neighboring rights, and books. Without scalability limitations, it’s absolutely conceivable to offer our platform as a service to other companies or industries, such as gaming. Google Cloud has opened a world of possibilities.”
—Sebastian Hentzschel, Chief Information Officer, BMG
With a leaner IT environment, BMG can focus its effort on the needs of its clients. Beyond improvements in royalty processing, it can concentrate on app development, releasing new features and enhancements more frequently. By hosting applications on Google Kubernetes Engine, App Engine, and Compute Engine, BMG has built a CI/CD pipeline with automated deployments and testing to significantly speed up workflows.
“In our old system, it could take several weeks to set up an environment,” says Gaurav. “With Google Kubernetes Engine, any of our developers can complete the process in a few clicks. Having that autonomy makes our developers more motivated and self-driven.”
“Google Cloud enables us to be more client focused and deliver better features faster,” adds Sebastian. “We believe it’s just the beginning. We offer rights and royalty services for music publishing, recorded music, neighboring rights, and books. Without scalability limitations, it’s absolutely conceivable to offer our platform as a service to other companies or industries, such as gaming. Google Cloud has opened a world of possibilities.”
With the migration almost complete, BMG is looking forward to its next technology project. It plans to leverage AutoML to further scale and automate royalty tracking with machine learning. On the marketing side, advanced analytics will help BMG determine the effectiveness of promotional campaigns around the world, further increasing profits for artists. By connecting Google Data Studio to BigQuery, BMG will increase the quality of its analyses, helping musicians better understand the reach of their music around the world.
In the end, Gaurav shares, helping musicians is what it all comes down to. “We’re a new kind of music company because we build our services around our artist, songwriter, and publisher clients, not the other way around,” he says. “Google Cloud is helping us maintain strong relationships with our clients, and that’s music to our ears.”
More Relevant Stories for Your Company

How Google Cloud & NGIS’ Partnership Powers Sustainability & Responsible Sourcing for Consumer Brands
In the competitive world of consumer goods, sustainability matters more than ever. In recent Google survey, 82% of consumers said sustainability is more top of mind now than it was before COVID-191 and 78% said that big businesses have a role to play in helping to fight climate change.2 As well as delivering on
How Intelligent and Trusted Data Cloud is Pivotal for Digital Disruption
Businesses that are dependent on legacy systems find it real hard to derive desired business results and unlock value from their ever-growing volume of siloed data, as a major chunk of their efforts and resources are invested in its extensive maintenance and management. Even with the adoption of latest tools

An AI-Powered Cost Cutting Guide: 8 Strategies for Maximizing Profits
We are increasingly seeing one question arise in virtually every customer conversation: How can the organization save costs and drive new revenue streams? Everyone would love a crystal ball, but what you may not realize is that you already have one. It's in your data. By leveraging Data Cloud and

Held Back by Database Scalability, This Financial Services Company Switches to Google Cloud and Cloud Spanner
Azimut Group operates an international network of companies handling investment and asset management, mutual funds, hedge funds, and insurance. Founded in Milan, Italy in 1988, Azimut Group today has branches in fifteen countries, including Brazil, China, and the USA. “We have subsidiaries and manage funds all over the world,” explains Simone







