About three years ago, JCB, one of the biggest Japanese payment companies, launched a project to develop new high-value services with agility. We set up a policy of starting small from scratch without using the existing system, which we call the concept of “Dejima”, where we focused on improving various aspects such as team structure, risk management, and application and platform development process.

Until now, large Japanese enterprises have built decision-making systems focused on eliminating unnecessary business processes and efficiently increasing quarterly profits. As a result, we are seeing more organizational structures that make it difficult to take on new challenges or experiments with trial and error. We wanted to breathe a new life into this situation, and that is how the concept of Dejima came up. In the Edo period, Japan closed its national border to other countries under its national isolation policy. At the time, Dejima was the only area where special rules were applied and allowed people from different cultures to come and go, and trade. This special rule generated the culture of inclusion and led to Dejima’s prosperity. Like Dejima, we believe that creating an organization that is independent from other business practices can be effective in enabling digital transformation for the organization. 

We have been able to make this transformation with the direct help of the Google Cloud and its products such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Spanner and Anthos Service Mesh, applying domain-driven design and microservice architecture. We named this the “JCB Digital Enablement Platform (JDEP),” which now hosts multiple business critical production services.

A key benefit of GKE is that the team can easily add resources and release them when they are finished, allowing them to be flexible to accommodate busy periods and off-seasons. Meanwhile, Anthos Service Mesh helps us manage complex environments easily. With containerization and managed services, we are prepared for the future for when more services go into production, as it would be easy to maintain and provide version upgrade support. At the same time, Cloud Spanner ensures that we maintain a 99.99% availability at all times.

Our initial motivation for introducing SRE practices was to break proverbial walls between business, development and operations, which was a success. Now we are focused on ensuring its reliability and maintaining customer satisfaction with our SRE practices.

To ensure the success of SRE practices that we implemented, there were a few categories we needed to address, from defining the organizational culture and practices to ensuring the policies attached to the new models created were practical enough to be implemented on the ground level. This is so that the Dejima concept remains sustainable for the long run.  

Instilling a culture of measurement 

Here, “appropriate” reliability is the key. According to the conventional way of thinking at JCB, “service failure must not occur” and “SLA should be maintained as high as possible.” We started by discussing what was the “appropriate reliability” that our customers really needed, but it was not as easy as we thought because the level of reliability for user satisfaction differed from application to application. 

Eventually, the business, development and operations teams formulated specific SLIs and SLOs together, something we would never have been able to do if we discussed separately. This is because the business is required to compromise on lower service levels, since our reliability standard used to be too high. The collaboration of development and operations teams is necessary to understand how our system works upon our users’ interactions.

After Google Cloud helped us run a series of workshops where all teams participated, we saw change within the organization. The business team started evangelizing SRE to other members in the business department, and the development and operations teams started collaborating autonomously. We felt like we were working at Google speed, accomplishing so much in a short amount of time. 

Understanding SRE as an entire company is necessary to progress. We are now working on creating internal training materials to spread the SRE concept throughout the company.

Eliminating ambiguity

With the cooperation of Google Cloud, we have created a Team Charter that defines the team’s mission, values and engagement models. We also created policy documents that include Incident Response Policy, Postmortem Policy, On-call Policy, Toil Policy and Error Budget Policy, to eliminate ambiguity in day-to-day operations.

For example, when an incident occurs, we can identify exactly the level of importance, the roles that are assigned to each person, and in what order they need to follow. When to do a postmortem, who owns it? What to do if the error budget is exhausted? How do other teams reach out to SRE when they have problems? The written policy documents will dramatically improve efficiency and motivate teams to adopt a culture of learning from failures.

The format for such policies are written in Google’s SRE book, but when we adopt it, it needs to take into account the circumstances specific to our company. Simply copying an existing policy won’t work, which is why it’s important to formulate a policy that fits the situation each team is in.

Reformalizing teams

Based on these policies, JCB’s SRE team has two sub-teams. One is called Sheriff which works as the platform SRE, and provides infrastructure services for the application team. The other is called the Diplomat which works as the embedded SRE, and participates in the application team to lead productionisation. There is also a team called Architecture that is separate from the SRE teams whose role is to consult SRE on system design and review architecture.

The SRE team was a single role when it was first launched, but now has two sub-teams. This is because as the number of application teams increases, the number of support tasks for the teams also increases, which can result in a shortage of resources to work on overall improvement. Securing people who are not interrupted from day-to-day support tasks and focusing on the main task improves efficiency.

Whereas both sub-teams share the on-call duty, some engineers are not allowed to do it by contract as they are not allowed to get paged. For those who cannot participate in on-call duties, we created what’s called a Toil Shift, which allows them to focus on resolving tickets in our backlogs instead.

This works well so far, but we will keep evolving as our business grows.

Editor’s note: Today we are hearing from Jono MacDougall , Principal Software Engineer at Ravelin. Ravelin delivers market-leading online fraud detection and payment acceptance solutions for online retailers. To help us meet the scaling, throughput, and latency demands of our growing roster of large-scale clients, we migrated to Google Cloud and its suite of managed services, including Cloud Bigtable, the scalable NoSQL database for large workloads.

As a fraud detection company for online retailers, each new client brings new data that must be kept in a secure manner and new financial transactions to analyze. This means our data infrastructure must be highly scalable and constantly maintain low latency. Our goal is to bring these new organizations on quickly without interrupting their business. We help our clients with checkout flows, so we need latencies that won’t interrupt that process—a critical concern in the booming online retail sector. 

We like Cloud Bigtable because it can quickly and securely ingest and process a high volume of data. Our software accesses data in Bigtable every time it makes a fraud decision. When a client’s customer places an order, we need to process their full history and as much data as possible about that customer in order to detect fraud, all while keeping their data secure. Bigtable excels at accessing and processing that data in a short time window. With a customer key, we can quickly access data, bring it into our feature extraction process, and generate features for our models and rules. The data stays encrypted at rest in Bigtable, which keeps us and our customers safe.

Bigtable also lets us present customer profiles in our dashboard to our client, so that if we make a fraud decision, our clients can confirm the fraud using the same data source we use.

We have configured our bigtable clusters to only be accessible within our private network and have restricted our pods access to it using targeted service accounts. This way the majority of our code does not have access to bigtable and only the bits that do the reading and writing have those privileges.

We also use Bigtable for debugging, logging, and tracing, because we have spare capacity and it’s a fast, convenient location. 

We conduct load testings against Bigtable.  We started at a low rate of ~10 Bigtable requests per second and we peaked at ~167000 mixed read and write requests per second  at absolute peak. The only intervention that was done to achieve this was pressing a single button to increase the number of nodes in the database. No other changes were made.

In terms of real traffic to our production system, we have seen ~22,000 req/s (combined read/write) on Bigtable in our live environment as a peak within the last 6 weeks.

Migrating seamlessly to Google Cloud 

Like many startups, we started with Postgres, since it was easy and it was what we knew, but we quickly realized that scaling would be a challenge, and we didn’t want to manage enormous Postgres instances. We looked for a kind of key value store, because we weren’t doing crazy JOINS or complex WHERE clauses. We wanted to provide a customer ID and get everything we knew about it, and that’s where key value really shines.  

I used Cassandra at a previous company, but we had to hire several people just for that chore. At Ravelin we wanted to move to managed services and save ourselves that headache. We were already heavy users and fans of BigQuery, Google Cloud’s serverless, scalable data warehouse, and we also wanted to start using Kubernetes. This was five years ago, and though quite a few providers offer Kubernetes services now, we still see Google Cloud at the top of that stack with Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). We also like Bigtable’s versioning capability that helped with a use case involving upserts. All of these features helped us choose Bigtable.

Migrations can be intimidating, especially in retail where downtime isn’t an option. We were migrating not just from Postgres to Bigtable, but also from AWS to Google Cloud. To prepare, we ran in AWS like always, but at the same time we set up a queue at our API level to mirror every request over to Google Cloud. We looked at those requests to see if any were failing, and confirmed if the results and response times were the same as in AWS. We did that for a month, fine tuning along the way. 

Then we took the big step and flipped a config flag and it was 100% over to Google Cloud. At the exact same time, we flipped the queue over to AWS so that we could still send traffic into our legacy environment. That way, if anything went wrong, we could fail back without missing data. We ran like that for about a month, and we never had to fail back. In the end, we pulled off a seamless, issue-free online migration to Google Cloud.

Flexing Bigtable’s features

For our database structure, we originally had everything spread across rows, and we’d use a hash of a customer ID as a prefix. Then we could scan each record of history, such as orders or transactions. But eventually we got customers that were too big, where the scanning wasn’t fast enough. So we switched and put all of the customer data into one row and the history into columns. Then each cell was a different record, order, payment method, or transaction. Now, we can quickly look up the one row and get all the necessary details of that customer. Some of our clients send us test customers who place an order, say, every minute, and that quickly becomes problematic if you want to pull out enormous amounts of data without any limits on your row size. The garbage collection feature makes it easy to clean up big customers.  

We also use Bigtable replication to increase reliability, atomicity, and consistency. We need strong consistency guarantees within the context of a single request to our API since we make multiple bigtable requests within that scope. So within a request we always hit the same replica of Bigtable and if we have a failure, we retry the whole request. That allows us to make use of the replica and some of the consistency guarantees, a nice little trade-off where we can choose where we want our consistency to live.https://www.youtube.com/embed/0-eH5u7rrQQ?enablejsapi=1&

We also use BigQuery with Bigtable for training on customer records or queries with complicated WHERE clauses. We put the data in Bigtable, and also asynchronously in BigQuery using streaming inserts, which allows our data scientists to query it in every way you can imagine, build models, and investigate patterns and not worry about query engine limitations. Since our Bigtable production cluster is completely separate, doing a query on BigQuery has no impact on our response times. When we were on Postgres many years ago, it was used for both analysis and real time traffic and it was not the optimal solution for us. We also use Elasticsearch for powering text searches for our dashboard.

If you’re using Bigtable, we recommend three features:

• Key visualizer. If we get latency or errors coming back from Bigtable, we look at the key visualizer first. We may have a hotkey or a wide row, and the visualizer will alert us and provide the exact key range where the key lives, or the row in question. Then we can go in and fix it at that level. It’s useful to know how your data is hitting Bigtable and if you’re using any anti-patterns or if your clients have changed their traffic pattern that exacerbated some issue.
• Garbage collection. We can prevent big row issues by putting size limits in place with the garbage collection policies.  
• Cell versioning. Bigtable has a 3d array, with rows, columns, and cells, which are all the different versions. You can make use of the versioning to get history of a particular value or to build a time series within one row. Getting a single row is very fast in Bigtable so as long as you can keep the data volume in check for that row, making use of cell versions is a very powerful and fast option. There are patterns in the docs that are quite useful and not immediately obvious. For example, one trick is to reverse your timestamps (MAXINT64 – now) so instead of the latest version, you can get the oldest version effectively reversing the cell version sorting if you need it.

Google Cloud and Bigtable help us meet the low-latency demands of the growing online retail sector, with speed and easy integration with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery. With their managed services, we freed up time to focus on innovations and meet the needs of bigger and bigger customers. 

Learn more about Ravelin and Bigtable, and check out our recent blog, How BIG is Cloud Bigtable?

Modern applications need to process large-scale data at millisecond latency to provide experiences like instant gaming leaderboards, fast analysis of streaming data from millions of IoT sensors, or real-time threat detection of malicious websites. In-memory datastores are a critical component to deliver the scale, performance, and availability required by these modern applications. 

Memorystore makes it easy for developers building applications on Google Cloud to leverage the speed and powerful capabilities of the most loved in-memory store: Redis. Memorystore for Redis standard tier instances are a popular choice for applications requiring a highly available Redis instance. Standard tier provides a failover replica across zones for redundancy and provides fast failover with a 99.9% SLA. However, in some cases, your applications will require more read throughput from a standard tier instance. One of the common patterns customers use to scale read queries in Redis is leveraging read replicas.

Introducing Memorystore for Redis Read Replicas

Today we are excited to announce the public preview of Memorystore for Redis Read Replicas, which allows you to seamlessly scale your application’s read requests by 6X with the click of a button.

With read replicas, you can easily add up to five replicas and leverage the read endpoint to automatically load balance read queries across all the available replicas, increasing read performance linearly with each replica added. Additionally, Memorystore’s support for Redis 6 introduced multi-thread I/O, increasing performance significantly for M3 and higher configurations. Combined, you can achieve read requests of more than a million requests per second. 

You will benefit from this new functionality in several ways. You will be able to scale on demand with up to five read replicas and use read endpoint with any redis client to easily load balance read queries across multiple replicas. This new functionality will also improve availability with automatic distribution of replicas across multiple zones. With read replicas, you will also be able to minimize application downtime with fast failover to the replica with the least replication lag. In the future, Memorystore will also easily enable read replicas on existing standard tier instances to increase read throughput. 

You can learn more about how to configure and use read replicas in the Read Replicas Overview. 

Improving performance with Read Replicas and Redis 6

With the launch of read replicas, you can easily increase the read throughput of a Memorystore instance. You can further enhance the read performance by leveraging Redis version 6 along with read replicas.

To understand why combining read replicas and Redis 6 can significantly improve your application’s read performance, let’s look at the various Memorystore configurations that you can use with your applications today. Memorystore Basic and Standard offerings  provide different capacity tiers. The capacity tier determines the single node performance of a basic and standard tier instance. 

The table below outlines the configuration of the various capacity tiers:

Up until version 5, Redis processed commands using a single thread. The processing involved reading the request, parsing the request, processing the request, and writing the response back to the socket. This approach means that all of the processing, which includes writing the response, was sequentially processed by a single vCPU regardless of the number of vCPUs available in the instance.

Redis 6 introduced I\O threading which allows writing the response using parallel threads. This functionality enables Redis 6 to more effectively leverage available vCPUs, thereby increasing the overall throughput compared to lower versions. Memorystore for Redis version 6 leverages I\O threading and automatically configures the optimal number of I\O threads to achieve the best possible performance for the various capacity tiers. We have also improved the overall network throughput for all redis versions by leveraging improvements in the Google Cloud infrastructure. Together these improvements deliver significant performance improvements and come at no additional cost to you. 

So what can you expect from using Redis 6? As outlined in the table, Redis version 5 and lower uses a single thread to process the write requests for all tiers while Redis 6 uses a larger number of I\O threads at higher capacity tiers which provides substantially incremental throughput for higher capacity tiers.

For example, using a Redis 6 standard tier instance with a capacity of 101 GB (M5), we have observed up to a 200% improvement in read/write performance compared to version 5, though the actual value you’ll see is dependent on your workload. You can get the benefits of Redis 6 by upgrading an existing instance or by deploying a new instance.

By enabling read replicas on an instance using Redis 6, you can further improve the read performance. Read throughput scales linearly with the number of replicas so you can increase your read queries on an instance by up to 500% using five read replicas. By combining Redis 6 and read replicas, you can see a 10X increase in read performance compared to a version 5 standard tier instance with no read replicas.

We are excited about the launch of read replicas but this is just one step in our journey to deliver the scale you need at the best price-performance. You can learn more about read replicas pricing on our Memorystore pricing page and get started using the Read Replicas Overview.

In general, the MySQL functionality provided by a Google Cloud’s SQL Database (Cloud SQL) instance is the same as the functionality provided by a locally-hosted MySQL instance.

However, there are a few differences between a standard MySQL instance and a Cloud SQL for MySQL instance.

Unsupported Features

• User defined functions
• InnoDB memcached plugin
• Federated Engine
• The SUPER privilege

Unsupported Statements

Sending any of the following types of SQL statements will generate an error with the message “Error 1290: The MySQL server is running with the google option so it cannot execute this statement”:

• LOAD DATA INFILE
• Note that LOAD DATA LOCALINFILE is supported.
• SELECT … INTO OUTFILE
• SELECT … INTO DUMPFILE
• INSTALL PLUGIN …
• UNINSTALL PLUGIN
• CREATE FUNCTION … SONAME …

Unsupported Statements for Second Generation Instances

The following statements are not supported because Second Generation instances use GTID replication:

• CREATE TABLE … SELECT statements
• CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE statements inside transactions
• Transactions or statements that update both transactional and nontransactional tables

For more information, see the MySQL documentation.

Unsupported Functions

• LOAD_FILE()

Unsupported Client Program Features

• mysqlimport without using the –local option. This is because of the LOAD DATA INFILE restriction. If you need to load data remotely, use the Cloud SQL import function.

• mysqldump using the –tab option or options that are used with –tab. This is because the FILE privilege is not granted for instance users. All other mysqldump options are supported.

• If you want to import databases with binary data into your Cloud SQL for MySQL instance, you must use the –hex-blob option with mysqldump.

• Although hex-blob is not a required flag when you are using a local MySQL server instance and the mysql client, it is required if you want to import any databases with binary data into your Cloud SQL instance. For more information about importing data, see Importing Data.

• Not all MySQL options and parameters are enabled for editing as Cloud SQL flags.

• To request the addition of a configurable Cloud SQL flag, use the Cloud SQL Discussion group.

• For Second Generation instances, InnoDB is the only supported storage engine. For help with converting tables from MyISAM to InnoDB, see the MySQL documentation.

• You cannot import or export triggers, functions, stored procedures, or views into Cloud SQL. However, you can create and use these elements on a Cloud SQL instance.

Notable MySQL Options

Cloud SQL runs MySQL with a specific set of options. If an option might impact how your applications work, we note it here for your information.

skip-name-resolve

This flag impacts how hostnames are resolved for client connections. Learn more.

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL

Features

• Fully managed PostgreSQL databases in the cloud, based on the Cloud SQL Second Generation platform.
• Custom machine types with up to 416 GB of RAM and 64 CPUs.
• Up to 10TB of storage available, with the ability to automatically increase storage size as needed.
• Create and manage instances in the Google Cloud Platform Console.
• Instances available in US, EU, or Asia.
• Customer data encrypted on Google’s internal networks and in database tables, temporary files, and backups.
• Support for secure external connections with the Cloud SQL Proxy or with the SSL/TLS protocol.
• Data replication between multiple zones with automatic failover.
• Import and export databases using SQL dump files.
• Support for PostgreSQL client-server protocol and standard PostgreSQL connectors.
• Automated and on-demand backups.
• Instance cloning.
• Integration with Stackdriver logging and monitoring.

Some features are not yet available for Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL:

• Point-in-time recovery (PITR)
• Import/export in CSV format using GCP Console or the gcloud command-line tool.

Supported Extensions

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL supports many PostgreSQL extensions. For a complete list, see PostgreSQL Extensions.

Supported Procedural Languages

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL supports the PL/pgSQL SQL procedural language.

Supported Languages

You can use Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL with App Engine applications running in the flexible environment that are written in Java, Python, PHP, Node.js, Go, and Ruby. You can also use Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL with external applications using the standard PostgreSQL client-server protocol.

Differences between Cloud SQL and standard PostgreSQL functionality

In general, the PostgreSQL functionality provided by a Cloud SQL instance is the same as the functionality provided by a locally-hosted PostgreSQL instance. However, there are a few differences between a standard PostgreSQL instance and a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL instance.

Unsupported Features

• Any features that require SUPERUSER privileges. An exception to this rule is made for the CREATE EXTENSION statement, but only for supported extensions.
• Custom background workers

• The psql client in Cloud Shell does not support operations that require a reconnection, such as connecting to a different database using the \c command.

Notable Differences

There are a number of PostgreSQL options and parameters that are not enabled for editing as Cloud SQL flags.

To request the addition of a configurable Cloud SQL flag, use the Cloud SQL Discussion group.

As the volume of data that people and businesses produce continues to grow exponentially, it goes without saying that data-driven approaches are critical for tech companies and startups across all industries. But our conversations with customers, as well as numerous industry commentaries, reiterate that managing data and extracting value from it remains difficult, especially with scale.

Numerous factors underpin the challenges, including access to and storage of data, inconsistent tools, new and evolving data sources and formats, compliance concerns, and security considerations. To help you identify and solve these challenges, we’ve created a new whitepaper, “The future of data will be unified, flexible, and accessible,” which explores many of the most common reasons our customers tell us they’re choosing Google Cloud to get the most out of their data.

For example, you might need to combine data in legacy systems with new technologies. Does this mean moving all your data to the cloud? Should it be in one cloud or distributed across several? How do you extract real value from all of this data without creating more silos?

You might also be limited to analyzing your data in batch instead of processing it in real-time, adding complexity to your architecture and necessitating expensive maintenance to combat latency. Or you might be struggling with unstructured data, with no scalable way to analyze and manage it. Again, the factors are numerous—but many of them accrue to inadequate access to data, often exacerbated by silos, and insufficient ability to process and understand it.

The modern tech stack should be a streaming stack that scales with your data, provides real-time analytics, incorporates and understands different types of data, and lets you use AI/ML to predictively derive insights and operationalize processes. These requirements mean that to effectively leverage your data assets:

• Data should be unified across your entire company, even across suppliers, partners, and platforms., eliminating organizational and technology silos.
• Unstructured data should be unlocked and leveraged in your analytics strategy.
• The technology stack should be unified and flexible enough to support use cases ranging from analysis of offline data to real-time streaming and application of ML without maintaining multiple bespoke tech stacks.
• The technology stack should be accessible on-demand, with support for different platforms, programming languages, tools, and open standards compatible with your employees’ existing skill sets.

With these requirements met, you’ll be equipped to maximize your data, whether that means discerning and adapting to changing customer expectations or understanding and optimizing how your data engineers and data scientists spend their time. In coming weeks, we’ll explore aspects of the whitepaper in additional blog posts—but if you’re ready to dive in now, and to steer your tech company or startup towards success by making your data better work for you, click here to download your copy, free of charge.