TL;DR – Regular file export for Google Cloud billing is going away on May 15th! Try out this interactive tutorial to set up exporting and explore your billing data with BigQuery

You may have seen an email from Google Cloud reminding you to set up billing data export to BigQuery, and letting you know that file export options are going away. More specifically:

Starting May 15, 2023, your daily usage and cost estimates won’t be automatically exported to a Cloud Storage bucket. Your existing Cloud Storage buckets will continue to exist, but no new files will be added on an ongoing basis.

In fact, I even received one of these notifications since I had an old billing account (or two) that still had file export enabled. Even though the file export is going away, exporting your billing data to BigQuery gives you more detail and more capabilities to analyze, so it’s a big upgrade.

Start from the start

While Google Cloud does offer a free trial and free tier of services, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that most cloud services cost money to use. With the unique properties of the cloud, it’s much easier to bill for exact usage of various services, like pay-per-second for virtual machines. However, this can also become an overwhelming amount of information when a large number of services are being used across multiple teams. In order to make sure you understand your billing data, Google Cloud offers that data through direct reporting in the Cloud console, file exports, and exporting to BigQuery.

Most importantly, the file export for Cloud Billing data is going away on May 15th (the file exports for specific reports, like the cost table, aren’t going away). This was an option for billing accounts to generate daily CSV or JSON files into a Cloud Storage bucket so you could download the files and analyze them as needed. While these exports were definitely helpful for looking at your billing data, over time they couldn’t keep up with the complexity and volume of data that comes out of a billing account.

The most important thing to note here is simple: this export option is being deprecated entirely, so if you’re currently using it (and even if you’re not), you should make sure exporting to BigQuery is enabled.

Large data, large queries

Exporting from your billing account into BigQuery has been an option for the past few years, and now more than ever it’s the central option for managing your billing data. Of course, BigQuery is a natural home for large datasets with the scale and granularity of your billing data. In addition to that, exporting to BigQuery also happens more frequently than a daily file export, so you can do cost anomaly detection much faster.

As teams and organizations become larger, it can be increasingly difficult to figure out which groups are responsible for different costs. If your organization is using a chargeback model (where one group pays for all resources and then breaks down cost details for individual teams/groups to be responsible for their usage), then using BigQuery is the best way for you to accurately collect and analyze costs. On top of being able to query directly against your data, BigQuery also makes it much easier to integrate with other tools, like Looker or Looker Studio for visualization.

The actual data being exported to BigQuery are hourly records of every service your billing account is responsible for, along with detailed information like the SKU, what type of unit is being measured, and how many of that unit you’re paying for.

I suspect most folks using the file export (and probably most folks overall) will be fine with the standard export for BigQuery, and can use the detailed cost and pricing options if they need even more details. You can find some more details on all the exports in this blog post.

With the file export going away, it’s also important to mention: exporting your Cloud Billing data to BigQuery starts when you enable it, and doesn’t include older data. So make sure you set yourself up for future success by enabling billing export as soon as possible. Try using our built-in walkthrough to help you enable the export and to get started analyzing the data! You can also read more in the documentation.

Cloud Spanner is a fully managed relational database with unlimited scale, strong consistency, and up to 99.999% availability. It is designed for highly concurrent applications that read and update data, for example, to process payments or for online game play. To ensure the consistency across multiple concurrent transactions, Cloud Spanner uses a combination of shared locks and exclusive locks to control access to the data. In this blog, we will explore the different types of locks present in Cloud Spanner. We will also discuss some common cases of transactional locking in Cloud Spanner, and what to look out for to detect when these cases might be occurring.

What is a lock?

Before we get into the details, let us first quickly recap and define a lock in the context of database systems.

“Locks” in databases are a mechanism for concurrency control. Locks are typically held on a resource, which may mean rows, columns, tables or even entire databases. When a resource is locked by a transaction, it cannot be accessed by another transaction until the lock is released.

Timeline view of transactions

Before we proceed to discuss transaction locking in the context of read and read-write transactions, it is important to recap the timeline view of the transactions in Spanner.

Please also keep in mind the concept of write buffering in transactions, since we refer to it in the Common Transaction Patterns section below. Write buffering refers to the Cloud Spanner server(s) accepting the writes. Note that these writes are not durable until a commit has been performed.

Types of locks in Cloud Spanner

Cloud Spanner operations acquire locks when the operations are part of a read-write transaction. Read-only transactions do not acquire locks. Unlike other approaches that lock entire tables or rows, the granularity of transactional locks in Spanner is a cell, or the intersection of a row and a column. This means that two transactions can read and modify different columns of the same row at the same time. To maximize the number of transactions that have access to a particular data cell at a given time, Cloud Spanner uses different lock modes.

Here is a brief description of the different lock types. Learn more about each lock type in the Cloud Spanner documentation.

1. ReaderShared Lock – Acquired when a read-write transaction reads data.
2. WriterShared Lock – Acquired when a read-write transaction writes data without reading it.
3. Exclusive Lock – Acquired when a read-write transaction which has already acquired a ReaderShared lock tries to write data after the completion of read. It is a special case for a transaction to hold both the ReaderShared lock and WriterShared lock at the same time.
4. WriterSharedTimestamp Lock – Special type of lock acquired when inserting new rows with the transaction’s commit timestamp as part of the primary key.

Handling Lock Conflicts

Since read-write transactions use locks to execute atomically, they run the risk of deadlocking. For example, consider the following scenario: transaction Txn1 holds a lock on record A and is waiting for a lock on record B, and Txn2 holds a lock on record B and is waiting for a lock on record A. The only way to make progress in this situation is to abort one of the transactions so it releases its lock, allowing the other transaction to proceed.

Cloud Spanner uses the standard “wound-wait” algorithm to handle deadlock detection. Under the hood, Spanner keeps track of the age of each transaction that requests conflicting locks. It also allows older transactions to abort younger transactions, where “older” means that the transaction’s earliest read, query, or commit happened sooner.

Common Transaction Patterns

Armed with the basics of transactions and locks in Cloud Spanner, we will now walk through a few practical use-cases. We take the example of an application which queries and updates users’ balance in a table named accounts. The accounts table has the following columns –

Case 1: Transaction waiting to get exclusive lock because of higher priority shared-lock

Sequence

1. Txn1 begins.
2. Txn2 begins.
3. Txn2 reads the table and acquires a ReadShared Lock.
4. Txn1 buffers its write.
5. Txn1 tries to commit, but since Txn2 has higher priority (because it has executed its first operation first), Txn1 will have to wait until Txn2 releases the ReadShared Lock.

After committing, Txn2 releases its ReadShared Lock. Txn1 is now able to upgrade to an Exclusive Lock. It acquires the Exclusive Lock and commits.

Note 1: UPDATE WHERE is always transformed into SELECT WHERE, so an UPDATE statement is not a blind write, but a read-write operation.

Note 2: While the above example considers the use-case of querying and updating a single row, the same transaction pattern is also applicable across a key-range.

What to watch out for

• Timeouts due to Transactions waiting for acquiring locks. Refer to transaction statistics and lock statistics to understand how to detect this.

When does this typically happen

• Concurrent updates to a single key/key-range in a table.

Case 2: Transaction aborted because of concurrent execution succeeding

Sequence

1. Txn1 begins.
2. Txn2 begins.
3. Txn1 reads a row from the table and acquires a ReadShared Lock.
4. Txn2 reads the same row as Txn1 and acquires a ReadShared Lock.
5. Txn1 buffers its write.
6. Txn2 buffers its write.
7. Txn1 tries to commit, has higher priority (because it has executed its first operation first), it will get priority in upgrading to an Exclusive Lock. It acquires the Exclusive Lock and commits.

Since Txn1 has committed and was the higher priority transaction, Txn1 will abort Txn2.. The abort will likely happen before Txn2 tries to commit.

What to watch out for

• High number of transaction aborts due to wounding of transactions. Refer to transaction statistics and lock statistics to understand how to detect this.

When does this typically happen

• Concurrent updates to a single key/key-range. Typically this happens in the case of hot keys being present in the table.

Case 3: Transaction waiting to get exclusive lock because of higher priority shared-lock & getting aborted because of prior succeeding concurrent execution

Sequence

1. Txn1 begins.
2. Txn2 begins.
3. Txn2 reads the table and acquires a ReadShared Lock.
4. Txn1 reads the table and acquires a ReadShared Lock.
5. Txn1 buffers its write.
6. Txn2 buffers its write.
7. Txn1 tries to commit, but since Txn2 holds a ReadShared Lock, it has to wait until it gets cleared.
8. Since Txn2 has higher priority (because it has executed its first operation first), it will acquire the Exclusive Lock first. Txn2 upgrades its ReaderShared Lock to an Exclusive Lock and commits.

Finally, after Step 8, when Txn1 tries to commit (since ReaderShared Lock from Txn2 is now cleared) it gets aborted. This is done to prevent deadlock with the higher priority transaction (Txn2).

Note: In Case 1, even though Txn2 had acquired a ReaderShared Lock earlier as in Case 3, it never upgraded to an Exclusive Lock (since there were no writes). Hence there was no need to abort Txn1, it could simply wait for Txn2 to release its ReaderShared lock and then commit.

What to watch out for

• High number of transaction aborts due to high contention between transactions. Refer to transaction statistics and lock statistics to understand how to detect this.

When does this typically happen

• Concurrent updates to a single key/key-range. Typically this happens in the case of hot keys being present in the table.

Recommendations

In order to mitigate these issues and reduce their occurrence. We recommend adopting the following best practices:

• If you need to perform more than one read at the same timestamp, and know in advance that you only need to read, consider using a read-only transaction. Because read-only transactions don’t write, they don’t hold locks and they don’t block other transactions. Further, read-only transactions never abort, so you don’t need to wrap them in retry loops.
• Always acquire ReadShared Locks on the smallest subset of keys or key ranges. This reduces the chances of lock contention.
• Analyze your code to only include critical path code within a transaction. Avoiding unneeded remote calls or complex, long-running business logic is a good way to ensure a transaction process quickly.
• Analyze your needs for multi-split transactions. Since transactions that update more than one split use a 2-phase commit protocol, they hold locks for a longer duration, thereby increasing chances of lock contention.

Get started today

Spanner’s unique architecture allows it to scale horizontally without compromising on the consistency guarantees that developers rely on in modern relational databases. Try out Spanner today for free for 90 days or for as low as $65 USD per month.

AI, deep learning, and image recognition is transforming the shopping experience. These technologies enable consumers to use product images or screenshots rather than text to search for similar products. This improves the customer experience and enables retailers with online and offline outlets to provide a genuine omnichannel experience.

The lack of complexity and the ease of use of BigQuery has enabled ViSenze to reduce its data infrastructure and management costs by 30%–50%, and scale up without incurring downtime.

—Renjie Yao, Data Platform Lead, ViSenze

Visual commerce provider ViSenze is helping some of the world’s leading retailers improve conversion rates through image-based search.

The business’s products also enable media companies to use the platform to turn images and videos into engagement opportunities—driving new and incremental revenues.

Created through NExT—a research center established by the National University of Singapore and Tsinghua University of China—ViSenze now operates in the United States, United Kingdom, India, China, and Singapore. The business is backed by Japan-based internet and ecommerce company Rakuten and cross-border investment specialist WI Harper Group.

Growth in SMB and Mobiles

Renjie Yao, Data Platform Lead at ViSenze, sees opportunities for growth in the small-to-medium business sector, where companies do not have the resources to build similar technologies, and with mobile device OEMs to integrate ViSenze natively on smartphones.

Phone owners can activate a “shopping lens” on camera and gallery apps to capture an image of a product. They then receive matching results from more than 800 partner merchants and retailers and can then click through to product pages on partner apps or mobile websites. Alternatively, they may use a photo to compare products sold on different sites or shop matching styles.

“Our research found Google Cloud provided a complete, integrated ecosystem rather than a disparate collection of tools and components, and so was ideal for our needs.”

—Renjie Yao, Data Platform Lead, ViSenze

The ViSenze API analyzes the contents of a selected or clicked image and sends the information back to the organization’s visual commerce platform. The platform feeds back similar results based on that information.

The ViSenze offering also extends to image analysis for the tagging of product attributes—such as a white turtleneck cardigan with full sleeves—to provide an improved search experience.

Data Vital to ViSenze

Capturing and analyzing large volumes of data is integral to ViSenze. “We have to understand how consumers interact with our customers’ ecommerce websites and apps,” says Yao. “For example, we need to know who has looked at a particular pair of jeans on a website and whether that visit led to a conversion. We can then tell that customer whether they need to make more stock available.”

ViSenze also relies on data to provide high-quality training for its image recognition models and its domain-specific models for online retail.

Protect Customer Data

Data is vital to ViSenze—but customer privacy is most important. “All the data we collect is transparent to our customers, meaning they can decide what they do not want us to collect. In addition, all personal data processing complies with privacy protection regulations in each region, such as the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe.”

A Quick Move to the Cloud

ViSenze started operations using servers, storage, networking, and associated systems in an on-premises data center operated by NExT.

However, to support rapid growth, the business decided to move its workloads to the cloud. ViSenze opted for a multi-cloud architecture, using in part a Google Cloud data infrastructure.

“Our research found Google Cloud provided a complete, integrated ecosystem rather than a disparate collection of tools and components, and so was ideal for our needs,” says Yao. “We could connect different components with the click of a mouse.” Further, the business found it could easily configure rules and pipelines to route data logs to relevant Google Cloud services.

The review found Google Cloud’s extensive managed services would also remove administration and maintenance tasks from ViSenze’s in-house technology team—freeing team members to focus on more valuable tasks.

In addition, Google Cloud provided the security features—including custom hardware running hardened operating systems and file systems and encryption of data at rest and in transit—needed to protect sensitive information. Finally, the location of Google Cloud regions in several countries would enable the business to meet regulatory and data sovereignty requirements.

A Three-Month Implementation

ViSenze opted to move to Google Cloud in mid-2017 and completed a three-month implementation using internal resources. “The process was very smooth and intuitive, and we had no problems building our entire data platform within Google Cloud,” says Yao.

The business now uses an architecture comprising Google Kubernetes Engine to manage and orchestrate Docker containers running in Google Cloud Platform; BigQuery to provide an analytics data warehouse, with Google Data Studio providing customizable visualization and reports; Stackdriver to monitor and manage virtual machine instances and services inside Google Cloud; Cloud SQL to manage its relational databases for real-time analytics; Compute Engine to provide compute resources; Cloud Storage to store files and objects; Cloud Pub/Sub to provide real-time messaging between applications; and Cloud Functions to build event-driven applications.

After collecting the request logs of users in virtual machine instances and Docker containers, ViSenze distributes them in three directions. “We export raw logs into Cloud Pub/Sub for indexing inside an Elasticsearch search engine, and to a BigQuery data warehouse for further analytics,” explains Yao. “We also use Cloud Functions-created applications to obtain the logs from Cloud Pub/Sub to perform some real-time calculations.”

“We are currently using Airflow workflow management on Compute Engine as our hosted ETL platform, but are likely to move to Cloud Composer in future.”

500 Million Records Per Day

With Google Cloud providing its data infrastructure, ViSenze is well positioned to meet internal and customer demands for more granular insights. The business is now processing 500 million records per day through BigQuery and saves up to one year’s aggregated data—excluding any personal data—in the data warehouse for analysis.

The nature of ViSenze’s business means most reports are generated for data processed on an hourly, daily, or monthly basis. “BigQuery is extremely stable and performance optimized, regardless of the volume of data it processes,” says Yao. “Across BigQuery and other Google Cloud Platform services, we’ve recorded 99.99% availability over the past year.”

The lack of complexity and the ease of use of BigQuery has enabled ViSenze to reduce its data infrastructure and management costs by 30%–50%, and scale up without incurring downtime.

“With BigQuery, we have saved the equivalent of two full-time engineers and now need only half of one person’s time to maintain our whole data platform,” says Yao.

“In addition, BigQuery integrates closely with Data Studio, enabling non-technical people in our product and business teams to create dynamic, detailed analysis dashboards. We now use Data Studio to create nearly 50 separate reports.”

The business has now grown to offer access to more than 1 billion users and a listing of more than 400 million purchasable products.

Next Steps

ViSenze is now researching the potential of the Cloud AutoML suite of machine learning products to improve the training of its models and run a fully managed NoSQL database through Cloud Datastore.

“A NoSQL database service is the only missing piece of our architecture for now, and using Cloud Datastore would enable us to focus almost exclusively on our business,” says Yao. “With Google Cloud Platform, we are ideally positioned to continue providing support to our business team and help them continue expanding into new markets.

“In addition, we can help retailers and consumers to unlock the potential of the web and apps to transform the purchasing experience.”

If your organization is one of the 52% of SAP customers whose top analytics pain point is data integration¹, Google Cloud has got you covered. By working with partners like Qlik, we are expanding our integration options and bringing real-time replication capability for SAP to BigQuery.

Integrated data for accelerated insights

BigQuery—our fully managed, enterprise data warehouse that can scale up to petabytes on demand and execute queries in seconds—allows SAP customers to consolidate enterprise data silos and confidently derive more use and value from their data.  Customers can accelerate and simplify the delivery of SAP data on BigQuery with the latest Qlik Data Integration platform offering for Google Cloud which allows data integration using an automated, near real-time data pipeline through Qlik Replicate, whether data originates from legacy SAP environments, SAP HANA, or SAP application servers. Additionally, Qlik Compose for Data Warehouses can be used to easily generate and automate logical data models from SAP directly in BigQuery freeing up more time for data analysts to leverage advanced built-in capabilities such as BigQuery ML to derive greater value and insights using standard SQL without the need for advanced programming expertise.

Delivering faster results with real-time 

Traditional extract-transform-load (ETL) solutions operate on a batch basis, pulling data sets from SAP daily, hourly, or every minute. These tools often require manual mapping of multiple data fields so that data flows accurately. Given SAP’s highly complex table relationships, in which a single transaction can result in multiple changes, this can be a time consuming and tedious process. ETL can also increase the burden on your SAP systems.

Qlik Replicate simplifies this with its intuitive user interface where you can set up real-time data replication between SAP and BigQuery, eliminating the need for manual coding. And, to prevent system overhead, as soon as a new transaction is entered into SAP, the resulting data is replicated into BigQuery in a process known as change data capture (CDC) from SAP’s log layer. This means that data transfer can benefit from high performance with minimal impact on the source system’s resources. Read our latest white paper to learn how to extract SAP data into BigQuery leveraging Qlik Replicate. 

Solution expertise for all core SAP workloads

It doesn’t matter what database your SAP system runs on, Qlik Replicate supports all core SAP systems. It automates real-time data replication and decodes SAP’s complex, application-specific data structures into formats that flow smoothly into BigQuery. This ensures that anyone who depends on data analytics has the most current and relevant SAP data they need. For its robust solution capabilities Qlik has received a new “SAP on Google Cloud Expertise” designation for supporting:

• Fast onboarding and accelerated replication of SAP data into Google Cloud
• Real-time and continuous data replication from SAP applications to BigQuery
• Support for all core SAP modules and a broad set of data sources
• Automated data integration, which cuts resource requirements for initial delivery and ongoing maintenance

Proven customer results

Many SAP customers have experienced the benefits of leveraging Qlik alongside BigQuery for data analytics and AI at scale, including German luxury department store chain Breuninger. In order to meet its customers’ growing and changing expectations,Breuninger needed to accelerate its time to insight from data sources across a highly dispersed landscape of on-premises databases and systems, including SAP. The company uses Qlik Replicate to feed corporate data from modules in its SAP system into BigQuery and integrate its varying on-premises databases with the Google Cloud environment. This has yielded game-changing, real-time customer insights for the retailer.

What could your business do with faster, more integrated insights? Learn more about BigQuery for SAP customers and also how Qlik and Google Cloud can help you modernize and automate data integration and analytics.