Principles to Make Organizations Data Engineering Driven

4848
Of your peers have already read this article.
4:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
In the “What type of data processing organisation” paper, we examined that you can build a data culture whether your organization consists mostly of data analysts, or data engineers, or data scientists. However, the path and technologies to become a data-driven innovator are different and success comes from implementing the right tech in a way that matches a company’s culture. In this blog we will expand the data engineering driven organizations and provide how it can be built from the first principles.
Not all organizations are alike. All companies have similar functions (sales, engineering, marketing), but not all functions have the same influence on the overall business decisions. Some companies are more engineering-driven, others are sales-driven, others are marketing-driven. In practice, all companies are a mixture of all these functions. In the same way, the data strategy can be more focused on data analysts, and others on data engineering. Culture is a combination of several factors, business requirements, organizational culture, and skills within the organization.
Traditionally organizations that focused on engineering mainly came from technology driven digital backgrounds. They built their own frameworks or used programming frameworks to build repeatable data pipelines. Some of this is due to the way the data is received, the shape the data is received and the speed of the data arrival as well. If your data allows it, your organization can be more focused on data analysis, and not so much on data engineering. If you can apply an Extract-Load-Transform approach (ELT) rather than the classic Extract-Transform-Load (ETL), then you can focus on data analysis and might not need extensive data engineering capability. For example, data that can be loaded directly into the data warehouse allows data analysts to also do data engineering work and apply transformations to the data.
This does not happen so often though. Sometimes your data is messy, inconsistent, bulky, and encoded in legacy file formats or as part of legacy databases or systems, with a little potential to be actionable by data analysts.
Or maybe you need to process data in streaming, applying complex event processing to obtain competitive insights in near real time. The value of data decays exponentially with time. Most companies can process data by the next day in batch mode. However, not so many are probably obtaining such knowledge the next second data is produced.
In these situations, you need the talent to unveil the insights hidden in that amalgam of data, either messy or fast changing (or both!). And almost as importantly, you need the right tools and systems to enable that talent too.
What are those right tools? Cloud provides the scalability and flexibility for data workloads that are required in such complex situations. Long gone are the times when data teams had to beg for the resources that were required to have an impact in the business. Data processing systems are no longer scarce, so your data strategy should not generate that scarcity artificially.
In this article, we explain how to leverage Google Cloud to enable data teams to do complex processing of data, in batch and streaming. By doing so, your data engineering and science teams can have an impact when (in seconds) after the input data is generated.
Data engineering driven organizations
When the complexity of your data transformation needs is high, data engineers have a central role in the data strategy of your company, leading to data engineering driven organization. In this type of organization, data architectures are organized in three layers: business data owners, data engineers, and data consumers.
Data engineers are at the crossroads between data owners and data consumers, with clear responsibilities:
- Transporting data, enriching data whilst building integrations between analytical systems and operational systems ( as in the real time use cases)
- Parsing and transforming messy data coming from business units into meaningful and clean data, with documented metadata
- Applying DataOps, that is, functional knowledge of the business plus software engineering methodologies applied to the data lifecycle
- Deployment of models and other artifacts analyzing or consuming data

Business data owners are cross-functional domain-oriented teams. These teams know the business in detail, and are the source of data that feeds the data architecture. Sometimes these business units may also have some data-specific roles, such as data analysts, data engineers, or data scientists, to work as interfaces with the rest of the layers. For instance, these teams may design a business data owner, that is the point of contact of a business unit in everything that is related to the data produced by the unit.
At the other end of the architecture, we find the data consumers. Again, also cross-functional, but more focused on extracting insights from the different data available in the architecture. Here we typically find data science teams, data analysts, business intelligence teams, etc. These groups sometimes combine data from different business units, and produce artifacts (machine learning models, interactive dashboards, reports, and so on). For deployment, they require the help of the data engineering team so that data is consistent and trusted.
At the center of these crossroads, we find the data engineering team. Data engineers are responsible for making sure that the data generated and needed by different business units gets ingested into the architecture. This job requires two disparate skills: functional knowledge and data engineering/software development skills. This is often coined under the term DataOps (which evolved from DevOps methodologies developed within the past decades but applied to data engineering practices).
Data engineers have another responsibility too. They must help in the deployment of artifacts produced by the data consumers. Typically, the data consumers do not have the deep technical skills and knowledge to take the sole responsibility for deployment of their artifacts.This is also true for highly sophisticated data science teams. So data engineers must add other skills under their belt: machine learning and business intelligence platform knowledge. Let’s clarify this point, we don’t expect data engineers to become machine learning engineers. Data engineers need to understand ML to ensure that the data delivered to the first layer of a model ( the input ) is correct. They will also become key when delivering that first layer of data in the inference path, as here the data engineering skills around scale / HA etc really need to shine.
By taking the responsibility of parsing and transforming messy data from various business units, or for ingesting in real time, data engineers allow the data consumers to focus on creating value. Data science and other types of data consumers are abstracted away from data encodings, large files, legacy systems, complex message queue configurations for streaming. The benefits of concentrating that knowledge in a highly skilled data engineering team are clear, notwithstanding that other teams (business units and consumers) may also have their data engineers to work as interfaces with other teams. More recently, we even see squads created with members of the business units (data product owners), data engineers, data scientists, and other roles. Effectively creating complete teams with autonomy and full responsibility over a data stream, from the incoming data down to the data driven decision with impact in the business.
Reference architecture – Serverless
The number of skills required for the data engineering team is vast and diverse. We should not make it harder by expecting the team to maintain the infrastructure where they run data pipelines. They should be focusing on how to cleanse, transform, enrich, and prepare the data rather than how much memory or how many cores their solution may require.
The reference architectures presented here are based on the following principles:
- Serverless no-ops technologies
- Streaming-enabled for low time-to-insight
We present different alternatives, based on different products available in Google Cloud:
- Dataflow, the built-in streaming analytics platform in Google Cloud
- Dataproc, the Google Cloud’s managed platform for Hadoop and Spark.
- Data Fusion, a codeless environment for creating and running data pipelines
Let’s dig into these principles.
By using serverless technology we eliminate the maintenance burden from the data engineering team, and we provide the necessary flexibility and scalability for executing complex and/or large jobs. For example, scalability is essential when planning for traffic spikes during mega Friday for retailers. Using serverless solutions allows retailers to look into how they are performing during the day. They no longer need to worry about resources needed to process massive data generated during the day.
The team needs to have full control and write their own code for the data pipelines because of the type of pipelines that the team develops. This is true either for batch or streaming pipelines. In batch, the parsing requirements can be complex and no off the shelf solution works. In streaming, if the team wants to fully leverage the capabilities of the platform, they should implement all the complex business logic that is required, without artificially simplifying the complexity in exchange for some better latency. They can develop a pipeline that achieves a low latency with highly complex business logic. This again requires the team to start writing code from first principles.
However, that the team needs to write code should not imply that they need to rewrite any existing piece of code. For many input/output systems, we can probably reuse code from patterns, snippets, and similar examples. Moreover, a logical pipeline developed by a data engineering team does not necessarily need to map to a physical pipeline. Some parts of the logic can be easily reused by using technologies like Dataflow templates, and use those templates in orchestration with other custom developed pipelines. This brings the best of both worlds (reuse and rewrite), while saving precious time that can be dedicated to higher impact code rather than common I/O tasks. The reference architecture presented has another important feature: the possibility to transform existing batch pipelines to streaming.

The ingestion layer consists of Pub/Sub for real time and Cloud Storage for batch and does not require any preallocated infrastructure. Both Pub/Sub and Cloud Storage can be used for a range of cases as it can automatically scale up with the input workload.
Once the data has been ingested, our proposed architecture follows the classical division in three stages: Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL). For some types of files, direct ingestion into BigQuery (following an ELT approach) is also possible.
In the transform layer, we primarily recommend Dataflow as the data process component. Dataflow uses Apache Beam as SDK. The main advantage of Apache Beam is the unified model for batch and streaming processing. As mentioned before, the same code can be adapted to run in batch or streaming by adapting input and output. For instance, switching the input from files in Cloud Storage to messages published in a topic in Pub/Sub.
One of the alternatives to Dataflow in this architecture is Dataproc, Google Cloud’s solution for managed Hadoop and Spark clusters. The main use case is for those teams that are migrating to Google Cloud but have large amounts of inherited code in Spark or Hadoop. Dataproc enables a direct path to the cloud, without having to review all those pipelines.
Finally, we also present the alternative of Data Fusion, a codeless environment for creating data pipelines using a drag-and-drop interface. Data Fusion actually uses Dataproc as its Compute Engine, so everything we have mentioned earlier applies also to the case of Data Fusion. If your team prefers to create data pipelines without having to write any code, Data Fusion is the right tool.
So in summary, these are the three recommended components for the transform layer:
- Dataflow, powerful and versatile with a unified model for batch and streaming processing. Straightforward path to move from batch processing to streaming
- Dataproc, for those teams that want to reuse existing code from Hadoop or Spark environments.
- Data Fusion, if your team does not want to write any code.
Challenges and opportunities
Data platforms are complex. Having on top of that data responsibility the duty to maintain infrastructure is a wasteful use of valuable skills and talent. Often data teams end up managing infrastructure rather than focusing on analyzing the data. The architecture presented in this article liberates the data engineering team from having to allocate infrastructure and tweak clusters but instead to focus on providing value through data processing pipelines.
For data engineers to focus on what they do best, you need to fully leverage the cloud. A lift & shift approach from any on-premise installation is not going to provide that flexibility and liberation. You need to leverage serverless technologies. As an added advantage, serverless lets you also scale your data processing capabilities with your needs, and be able to respond to peaks of activity, however large these are.
Serverless technologies sometimes face the doubts of practitioners: will I be locked in with my provider if I fully leverage serverless? This is actually a question that you should be asking when deciding whether to set up your architecture on top of a provider.
The components presented here for data processing are based on open source technologies, and fully interoperable with other open source equivalent components. Dataflow uses Apache Beam, which not only unifies batch and streaming, but also offers a widely compatible runner. You can take your code elsewhere to any other runner. For instance, Apache Flink or Apache Spark. Dataproc is a fully managed Hadoop and Spark based on the vanilla open source components of this ecosystem. Data Fusion is actually the Google Cloud version of CDAP, an open source project.
On the other hand, for the serving layer, BigQuery is based on standard Ansi SQL. Whereas in the case of Bigtable and Google Kubernetes Engine, Bigtable is compatible at API level with HBase, and Kubernetes is an open source component.
In summary, when your components are based on open source, like the ones included in this architecture, serverless does not lock you in. The skills required to encode business logic in the form of data processing pipelines are based on engineering principles that remain stable across time. The same principles apply if you are using Hadoop, Spark, or Dataflow or UI driven ETL tooling. In addition, there are now new capabilities, such as low-latency streaming, that were not available before. A team of data engineers that learn the fundamental principles of data engineering will be able to quickly leverage those additional capabilities.
Our recommended architecture separates the logical level, the code of your applications, from the infrastructure where they run. This enables data engineers to focus on what they do best and on where they provide the highest added value. Let your Dataflow and your engineers impact your business, by adopting the technologies that liberate them and allow them to focus on adding business value. To learn more about building an unified data analytics platform, take a look at our recently published Unified Data Analytics Platform paper and Converging Architectures paper.
Lending DocAI Shortens Borrowers’ Journey on Roostify

11826
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
The home lending journey entails processing an immense number of documents daily from hundreds of thousands of borrowers. Currently, home lending document processing relies on some outdated digital models and a high dependency on manual labor, resulting in slow processing times and higher origination costs. Scaling a business that sorts through millions of documents daily, while increasing efficacy and accuracy, is no small feat. When it comes to applying for a mortgage loan, consumers expect a digital experience that’s as good as the in-person one. Roostify simplifies the home lending journey for lenders and their customers.
No time to spare: Overcoming document processing challenges with AI
Roostify provides enterprise cloud applications for mortgage and home lenders. In order to empower its customers to deliver a better, more personalized lending experience, they needed to automate and scale their in-house document parsing functionality.
As a key component of its document intelligence service, Roostify is leveraging Google Cloud’s Lending DocAI machine learning platform to automate processing documents required during a home loan application process, such as tax returns or bank statements with multi-language support. This partnership delivers data capture at scale, enabling Roostify customers to automatically identify document types from the uploaded file and to extract relevant entities such as wages, tax liabilities, names, and ID numbers for further processing, and make things move faster in the cumbersome lending process.
Roostify’s solutions leverage Google Cloud’s Lending DocAI, which is built on the recently announced Document AI platform, a unified console for document processing. Customers can easily create and customize all the specialized parsers (e.g., mortgage lending documents and tax returns parsers) on the platform without the need to perform additional data mapping or training. All Google Cloud’s specialized parsers are fine-tuned to achieve industry-leading accuracy, helping customers and partners confidently unlock insights from documents with machine learning. Learn more about the solution from the GA launch blog and the overview video.
Integrating Lending DocAI’s intelligent document processing capabilities into the Roostify platform means more innovation for their customers and tangible results: faster loan processing times, fewer document intake errors, and lower origination costs. Additional support in Google Lending DAI for other languages and more documents like global Know Your Customer (KYC) documents or payroll reports is in the near future.
Full integration of AI solutions
Working together with Roostify’s platform team, we were able to help them solve their document processing challenge through integration of various GCP products such as Lending DocAI (LDAI), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) for redacting sensitive data, BigQuery for data warehousing and analytics, and Firestore for API status. To make it very safe and secure, all data was encrypted end-to-end at Rest and in Transit. LDAI won’t require any training data to process. It is an easy plug and play API.
Here is a sneak peek in the high level deployment architecture for LDAI in Roostify environment:

Here are the steps for processing data:
- Receives document processing request from the client.
- API Function directs requests to the pre-processing service. For Async requests a processing ID is generated and returned to the caller.
- Pre-processing service sends the request for further processing (Long/short PDF conversion), calling other microservices and receives back the responses. Any error in the response received is then sent to the response processing service.
- If the response is synchronous, the pre-processing service directs it to the LDAI Invoker service.
- If the response is asynchronous, the pre-processing service feeds it into the Cloud Pub/Sub service.
- Cloud Pub/Sub service feeds the response back to the LDAI Invoker service.
- LDAI Invoker service routes the request to the Google LDAI API for classification if there are multiple pages in the document.
- Document will be split based on LDAI response and then saved in a GCS bucket for temporary storage.
- LDAI entity interface for single page processing and then LDAI Invoker sends LDAI results to LDAI Response Processing
- If a request is a synchronous request the LDAI Response Processor sends results to the API Function so that it can complete the synchronous call and respond to the rConnect caller.
- If the request is an asynchronous request the LDAI Response Processor will respond to the caller’s webhook and complete the transaction.
- Finally, Data stored in the GCP bucket will be deleted.
All the responses that come from the LDAI API can optionally feed into BigQuery via the Response Processor, after parsing it through Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API to redact the PII/sensitive information. Throughout the processing of both asynchronous and synchronous requests all transactions are logged using Cloud Logging. For asynchronous transactions, the state is maintained throughout the process using Cloud Firestore.
Roostify currently uses this technology to power two different solutions: Roostify Document Intelligence and Roostify Beyond™. Roostify Document Intelligence is a real-time document capture, classification, and data extraction solution built for home lenders. It ingests documents uploaded by borrowers and loan officers, identifies the relevant documents, and extracts and classifies key information. Roostify Document Intelligence is available as a standalone API service to any home lender with any digital lending infrastructure already in place.
Roostify Beyond™ is a robust suite of AI-powered solutions that enables home lenders to create intelligent experiences from start to close. It combines powerful data, insightful analytics, and meaningful visualization to streamline the underwriting process. Roostify Beyond™ is currently available only to Roostify customers as part of an Early Adopter program and will be rolled out to the market later this year.


Through this partnership, Roostify has enabled its customers to adopt a data-first approach to their home lending processes, which will lead to improved user experiences and significantly reduced loan processing times.
Fast track end-to-end deployment with Google Cloud AI Services (AIS)
Google AIS (Professional Services Organization), in collaboration with our partner Quantiphi, helped Roostify deploy this system into production and fast-tracked the development multifold to generate the final business value.
The partnership between Google Cloud and Roostify is just one of the latest examples of how we’re providing AI-powered solutions to solve business problems.
5545
Of your peers have already watched this video.
1:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Pega Systems Migrates SAP Servers to Google Cloud in Just 9 Weeks!
Pega Systems’ financial data on SAP environs were on a hosting platform that lacked agility. By moving nearly 30 SAP servers to Google Cloud in just 9 weeks, Pega Systems was able to unlock data and integrate BigQuery into SAP HANA to deliver personalization for clients and embark on an exciting journey with Google Cloud! Watch now.
ActivStat: Enhancing Live Sports Broadcast with Real-time Stats and Metrics

5105
Of your peers have already read this article.
2:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Millions of people annually view esports, as top players and teams compete in thrilling, fast-paced tests of reflexes, strategy, and teamwork. Fans are a diverse group, sharing a passion for action. A new, revolutionary project we’re working on with Call of Duty League just made that action a lot better.
ActivStat brings fans, players, and commentators the power of competitive statistics in real-time—stats that matter not only to the game at hand, but also for a full roster of competitors globally. Using ActivStat, live broadcasts will soon be enhanced with more depth and color-of-play while they’re happening, building excitement and adding to the overall experience.
Technically, ActivStat is an entirely new capability for esports. It’s a constantly updating catalog of statistics that is sourced, analyzed, updated, and delivered in an easy-to-consume way across global-scale computing systems, with a latency of milliseconds or seconds, rather than minutes or hours. By comparison, many of these stats today are available to fans after a day or more of processing.
Call of Duty League plans to begin rolling out ActivStat during the 2021 season. The initial rollout will include critical information like player and team standings and winning ratios across multiple aspects of virtual combat—including ultimately what these numbers mean for rankings. ActivStats are delivered both in raw statistics and via visualizations and graphics, providing commentators with fast access to the types of insights fans crave.
For engineers at both companies, building the service has been an epic success all its own. Due to a sponsorship with Call of Duty signed last February, our dedicated game engineering team quickly innovated a new solution incorporating high-speed networking, data pipelines from multiple cloud sources, and data warehousing to create a user-friendly dashboard. Real data was flowing into commentator dashboards by April.
Esports are more complex to cover in many ways than regular sports. Instead of a well-defined physical playing field (often a simple rectangular space), multiplayer games involve complex and sprawling virtual environments that can be the size of a large campus or airport with multiple levels and hidden locations.
Gameplay between competitors happens across many of these locations simultaneously. In addition, competitors also each choose their own configurations of equipment, known as “loadouts,” which can dramatically affect gameplay and strategy. All of this additional complexity in online gaming involves data that needs to be captured, analyzed, and communicated to the fans in insightful ways.
Two Google Cloud technology capabilities play central roles in the operations of ActivStat. BigQuery—a planet-scale data warehouse that can store and query petabytes of information in real time—is the foundation of the ActivStat platform for gathering and summarizing millisecond-level statistics. Looker, an intuitive analytic dashboard, surfaces those insights to commentators in an easy-to-use, real-time dashboard that enables the commentators to speak to compelling insights and statistics in sync with the gameplay as it is happening in the live broadcast.
While the initial release of ActivStat for this season of Call of Duty League provides compelling and powerful capabilities, it’s only the beginning of this Call of Duty League-Google Cloud co-innovation partnership. Our future vision is mapping gameplay hotspots on the field, and predicting where to place cameras with machine learning as the match evolves–enabling broadcast producers to build excitement for fans by always being in the middle of the best action. Call of Duty League and Google will also look to drive statistics and metrics directly into the broadcast feed.
The implications of the real-time statistical capabilities of ActivStat go beyond gaming and esports. Historically, gaming has been at the leading edge of what computer processing, computer graphics, wide-area networking, data analysis, and insight can do. The real-time data ingestion and output used in ActivStat could one day be useful powering live broadcasts in other types of sporting events, as well as blending live video feeds and data to support use cases in media & entertainment, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and other verticals. We’re excited about the potential for this bold new solution and partnership between Call of Duty League and Google in esports and beyond.
To learn more about Call of Duty League-Google Cloud partnership, visit our press release.
New to Cloud Firestore? Here are Some Basics You Need to Know

3555
Of your peers have already read this article.
5:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Learning to use a new database can be daunting, even more so if you don’t already have technical knowledge about databases. In this article, I will break down some database basics, terms you should know, what Firestore is, how it works, how it stores data, and how to get started using it with the assumption that you don’t have any existing database knowledge.
Before we dive into what Cloud Firestore is, let’s discuss some key database terms you should know. Feel free to skip this section if you are already familiar with the basics of Relational and non-relational databases.
What is a database?
A database is software that allows you to easily access, manage, modify, update, control and organize data. The way you want to store information can impact what type of database you choose. There are two major categories of databases, Relational and non-relational.
Relational Database
A relational database can be thought of like a spreadsheet. You can store information in your spreadsheet like this:

Now, what happens if I want to store information about where Sparrow1 lives, in my spreadsheet, but I don’t care about where the other birds live? I would have to add another column to my spreadsheet, called home, that would only contain data for the sparrow. That would look like this:

Even though I only want to know information about where the sparrow lives, I am required to have blank spaces in the column for all of the other animals. This is because in a relational database, you have a specific structure of your data called a schema. Just like in a spreadsheet, every item you are storing information on must have a place to put information about the bird’s home, even if you only want that information for one bird. This is enforced by the schema, which is essentially the column headers you put in the sheet and dictates a strict structure for the data, which has pros and cons.
The strict structure of a relational database allows your application to know what kind of data exists, to know what the data type is, and to enforce rules such as requiring data to be unique, or enforcing type of data stored etc. A schema, by design, forces the data in each row to have the same characteristics, which means it is not very flexible, unless you change the schema for the database. That means if you want to add different data that doesn’t fit your existing schema, you have to change the schema. As we discussed above, if you want to change the schema we are using to store information, such as Home, there is some information that will be stored for all rows, even if you don’t want to store anything. The amount of wasted storage is different between database engines, data types etc. Another thing to consider about Relational databases is that at scale, some traditional Relational databases will require more advanced deployments to handle the scale.
Changing the schema of a relational database can be highly disruptive, especially for busy workloads because it requires running scripts to change the schema and coordinating it carefully with the code changes in the app. Due to locking, you might even experience downtime in some cases. Now contrast that with a non-relational document database like Firestore, where you don’t have to worry about schema changes in the databases or downtime as a result of it.
Also, when you have a lot of data that you want to collect and it only applies to a few things in your database, having extra space with no information in it can become wasteful because it uses up storage space in many cases. A non-relational database can help get around this problem.
Non-relational databases
Generally speaking, a non-relational database stores information in a different format than a Relational database. There are 4 major categories of non-relational databases that you will hear most frequently.
- Column-Family
- Document (Firestore)
- Key-Value
- Graph
Since this post is focusing on Firestore, in this section we will dive into what a document database is, how it is used, and when to use it.
Document database (Firestore)
A document database can be thought of as a multi layered collection of entities, such as this:

As you can see, when the list is all collapsed, you can only see the information at the top; in this case, that is the BirdID (Cardinal1, Bluejay1, Sparrow1, Cardinal2, Crow1 etc. When I open the list I see “word: word”. For example, the document ID Sparrow1, points to a document with “Type: Sparrow”. I also see “Color: grey”, “Age: 2”, “Gender: f” and “Home: Birdhouse #3”

This is known as a key value pair. For “Type: Sparrow”, Type is the key and Sparrow is the value. All of the keys in the Sparrow1 document are: Type, Color, Age, Gender, House. All of the values in the Sparrow1 document are: Sparrow, grey, 2, f, Birdhouse #3.
Similarly to how the key gives you context, it allows you to ask the computer for a specific piece of information, such as the age of the bird. It is important to decide on a specific key term you will use for each piece of data you collect so your data can be easily read programmatically. This is called an implicit schema, an implied understanding of how data is stored that is not enforced by the database. Let’s go over what happens when we use an implicit schema.

Under Cardinal1, you see Type, Color, Age, and Gender; however, under Sparrow1 you also see House. This is possible because in a non-relational database you don’t have a schema that requires you to store the same information about every bird in your database; instead, you can store the specific information that you need for each bird, regardless of what is stored for other birds. This is a great benefit in terms of flexibility, but because of this flexibility, maintaining standard naming conventions is very important.
Now, let’s discuss why using standard naming conventions is so important. In the example above, if I ask a human: “What is the age of Cardinal1?”, they would probably tell me 2. If I asked them: “What is the Age of Bluejay1?”, they would probably tell me 4. These are both correct answers, but they are only correct because a human is able to assume what Age means. A computer, on the other hand, can’t make assumptions. If I ask a computer: “What is the Age of Cardinal1?” it would say 2, but if I ask it: “What is the Age of Bluejay1?” it would not know. This is because the computer is looking for the keyword Age and it isn’t able to use any context clues to determine what other words might mean Age. However, if I asked the computer: “What is the BirdAge of Bluejay1?”, the computer would tell me 4. Why do I care that I need to tell the computer to look for BirdAge to get the age of blujay one, but to look for Age to get the age of Cardinal one? I care because it means I would have to write two entirely different sets of instructions (i.e software code) to get the age of Cardinal1 and the age of Bluejay1 if I am not careful in how I structure my data. But when I structure my data well, this is not an issue and is infact a benefit by adding added flexibility.
What we see from this example, is that even without a strict schema, we can (and should) define conventions for document formats. If conventions aren’t defined, things can get unwieldy quickly.
How information is accessed
Now, let’s discuss how the information is accessed. If I wanted to know information about which birds are blue in our drop down list example, I would need to expand every section of the list to check if the bird is blue or not. As you can imagine, once you start to get a lot of birds in your database, it becomes cumbersome to open every drop down and see if the bird is blue. Luckily, Firestore lets you run these types of queries against the data (See more here) and receive all the documents that satisfy your conditions. On the other hand, if I wanted to know all of the information about Cardinal1, I could just open the drop down for Cardinal1 and I would have all of the information about that bird.
Now let’s start using some Firestore specific terminology. For the example we just discussed:Collections
- In Firestore, your data lives in collections. You can think of collections as tabs in a spreadsheet.
- Collections can be used to organize data. For example, if I decide that I want to collect data about birds and fish, the data about birds could be put in a birds collection, and the data about fish could be put in a Fish collection. ex:

- This is the unit of storage that Firestore uses. In our example, each bird is its own document. Documents reside in collections. This is what one document would contain:

- Each Document corresponds to a row in the sheet. The following diagram demonstrates that each column header maps to a property name in the document and that each value in a row maps to a value in the document.
- Each document must be identified by a unique identifier. In our example, that is BirdID. Notice that the value for BirdID is stored at the top level of the list, so when the document is closed, you can only see Cardinal1 and Cardinal1 is not also stored within the document.
- All documents can be uniquely identified by their location. Let’s think through this in words first before we move to code. If I want to tell someone to get data about the sparrow from the drop down lists, I would need to tell them:
- In the bird drop down list, can you please get all the information under Sparrow1 and put it on a piece of paper called sparrow1Info?
- Now let’s try that again using Firestore terms.
- From the birds collection, can you please get the document for sparrow1 from the Firestore database (db) and save it as sparrow1Info?
- Now let’s try it in code.
- var sparrow1Info = db.collection(‘birds’).doc(‘sparrow1’);
- A subcollection is a collection associated with a document. Using our example of the drop down list, we can add a collection called sightings that stores documents about each sighting of the specific bird. This is what that would look like:

- It is important to note that you don’t need to have the same subcollections on all documents. For example, Cardinal1 can be the only document that has a subcollection of Sightings.
How to search on Google about Firestore
The hardest part of learning a new technology can often be knowing the right terms to put into Google search to get the answers you are looking for. Here are some key terms that can help you get started
Your question:
How should I arrange my data to store it in Firestore?
Search:
Document database implicit schema design
Your Question:
What other databases are similar to firestore?
Search:
What are some document databases
Your Question:
How do I get all documents in the Birds collection?
Search:
How to use wildcards in Firestore
What next?
Try this guide to get started building your first application that uses firestore: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/quickstart

Takeaways from Forrester’s Cloud Data Warehouse Q1 2021 Report
DOWNLOAD RESEARCH REPORTS5149
Of your peers have already downloaded this article
20:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Cloud data warehouse (CDW) solutions have transformed the delivery of modern analytics and are known to have the capabilities to provision data warehouse of any size in a matter of minutes, autotune queries, scale resources including compute and storage on demand and auto-upgrade to the latest version. As the need for integrated, real-time and self-service analytics scale, CDW vendors continue to focus on native integration with data lakes and object stores; self-service to simplify access and administration for larger and more complex warehouses; and advanced capabilities on parallel processing, compression, partitioning, indexing, query optimization, and dynamic resource provisioning. The most common CDW use cases include customer analytics, AI/machine learning (ML)-based analytics, vertical-specific analytics, and real-time analytics. Customers that are looking to select a CDW vendor need to consider couple of factors.
Download the report learn more 13 leading CDW providers in the Forrester Wave: Cloud Data Warehouse, Q1 2021 report and also explore Google Cloud’s BigQuery for data warehousing.
More Relevant Stories for Your Company
Guide: Bring new life to your databases with an Oracle migration
Organizations today are being forced to make difficult decisions. Innovation has moved down the list for many companies, replaced with realities like making sure your business systems stay up and running during a disaster, managing unexpected shifts in demand,and above all, staying in business. In the short term, this means

Ahead of the Curve: 5 Data and AI Trends Set to Shape 2023
How will your organization manage this year's data growth and business requirements? Your actions and strategies involving data and AI will improve or undermine your organization's competitiveness in the months and years to come. Our teams at Google Cloud have an eye on the future as we evolve our strategies

How One Company Uses AI and Data Analysis to Boost Revenue
AI, deep learning, and image recognition is transforming the shopping experience. These technologies enable consumers to use product images or screenshots rather than text to search for similar products. This improves the customer experience and enables retailers with online and offline outlets to provide a genuine omnichannel experience. The lack of

UKG Ready: Meeting the Needs of Complex Machine Learning Models and Distributed Data Sets
Business ProblemUKG Ready primarily operates in the Small and Medium Business (SMB) space, so inherently many customers are forced to operate and make key business decisions with less Workforce Management (WFM) / Human Capital Management (HCM) data. In addition to volume, SMB lacks the variety of data needed to create







