Investing for Future: Why Shifting Security Left Helps Your Bottom Line

4491
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
The concept of “shifting left” has been widely promoted in the software development lifecycle. The concept is that introducing security earlier, or leftwards, in the development process will lead to fewer software-related security defects later, or rightwards, in production.
Shifting cloud security left can help identify potential misconfigurations earlier in the development cycle, which if unresolved can lead to security defects. Catching those misconfigurations early can improve the security posture of production deployments.
Why shifting security left matters
Google’s DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) highlights the importance of integrating security into DevOps in the 2016 State of DevOps Report. The report discussed the placement of security testing in the software development lifecycle. The survey found that most security testing and tool usage happened after the development of a release, rather than continuously throughout the development lifecycle. This led to increased costs and friction because remediating problems found in testing may involve big architectural changes and additional integration testing, as shown in Figure 1. For example, security defects in production can lead to GDPR violations, which can carry fines up to 4% of global annual revenue.

By inserting security testing into the development phase, we can identify security defects earlier and perform the appropriate remediation sooner. This results in fewer defects post-production and reduces remediation efforts and architectural changes. Figure 2 shows us that integrating security earlier in the SDLC results in overall decreases in security defects and associated remediation costs.

The 2021 State of DevOps Report expands the work of the 2016 report and advocates for integrating automated testing throughout the software development lifecycle. Automated testing is useful for continuously testing development code without the need for additional skills or intervention by the developer. Developers can continue to iterate quickly while other stakeholders can be confident that common defects are being identified and remediated.
From code to cloud
The DORA findings with regard to code security can also be applied to cloud infrastructure security. As more organizations deploy their workloads to the cloud, it’s important to test the security and configurations of cloud infrastructure. Misconfigurations in cloud resources can lead toward security incidents that could lead to data theft. Examples of such misconfigurations include overly permissive firewall rules, public IP addresses for VMs, or excessive Identity and Access Management (IAM) permissions on service accounts and storage buckets.
We can and should leverage different Google Cloud services to identify these misconfigurations early in the development process and prevent such errors from emerging in production to reduce the costs of future remediation, potential legal fines, and compromised customer trust.
The key tools in our toolshed are Security Command Center and Cloud Build. Security Command Center provides visibility into misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and threats within a Google Cloud organization. This information is critical when protecting your cloud infrastructure (such as virtual machines, containers, web applications) against threats, or identifying potential gaps from compliance frameworks (such as CIS Benchmarks, PCI-DSS, NIST 800-53, or ISO 27001.
Security Command Center further supports shifting security left by allowing visibility of security findings at the cloud project level for individual developers, while still allowing global visibility for Security Operations. Cloud Build provides for the creation of cloud-native CI/CD pipelines. You can insert custom health checks into a pipeline to evaluate certain conditions (such as security metrics) and fail the pipeline when irregularities are detected. We will now explore two use cases that take advantage of these tools.
Security Health Checker
Security Health Checker continuously monitors the security health of a Google Cloud project and promptly notifies project members of security findings. Figure 3 shows developers interacting with a Google Cloud environment with network, compute, and database components. Security Command Center is configured to monitor the health of the project.
When Security Command Center identifies findings, it sends them to a Cloud Pub/Sub topic. A Cloud Function then takes the findings published to that topic and sends them to a Slack channel monitored by infrastructure developers. Just like a spell checker providing quick feedback on misspellings, Security Health Checker provides prompt feedback on security misconfigurations in a Google Cloud project that could lead to deployment failures or post-production compromises. No additional effort is required on the part of developers.

Security Pipeline Checker
In addition to using Security Command Center for timely notification of security concerns during the development process, we can also integrate security checks into the CI/CD pipeline by using Security Command Center along with Cloud Build as shown in Figure 4.

The pipeline begins with a developer checking code into a git repository. This repository is mirrored to Cloud Source Repositories. A build trigger will begin the build process. The build pipeline will include a short waiting period of a few minutes to give Security Command Center a chance to identify security vulnerabilities. A brief delay may appear undesirable at first, but the analysis that takes place during that interval can result in the reduction of security defects post-production.
At the end of the waiting period, a Cloud Function serving as a Security Health Checker will evaluate the findings from Security Command Center (Connector 1 in Figure 4). If the validator determines that unacceptable security findings exist, the validator will inject a failure indication into the pipeline to terminate the build process (Connector 2 in Figure 4). Developers have visibility into the failure triggers and remediate them before successfully deploying code to production. This is in contrast to the findings in the 2016 State of DevOps Report wherein organizations that didn’t integrate security into their DevOps processes spent 50% more time remediating security issues than those who “shifted left” on security.
Closing thoughts
DORA’s 2016 State of DevOps report called out the need for “shifting left” with security, introducing security earlier in the development process to identify security vulnerabilities early to reduce mitigation efforts post-production. The report also advocated for automated testing throughout the software development lifecycle.
We looked at two ways of achieving these objectives in Google Cloud. The Security Health Checker provides feedback to developers using Security Command Center and Slack to notify developers of security findings as they pursue their development activities. The Security Pipeline Checker uses Security Command Center as part of a Cloud Build pipeline to terminate a build pipeline if vulnerabilities are identified during the build process. To implement the Security Heath Checker and the Security Pipeline Checker, check out the GitHub repository. We hope these examples will help you to “shift left” using Google Cloud services. Happy coding!
This article was co-authored with Jason Bisson, Bakh Inamov, Jeff Levne, Lanre Ogunmola, Luis Urena, and Holly Willey, Security & Compliance Specialists at Google Cloud.
How Air Asia’s CIO Ensures Its 22,000 Employees Service Customers Efficiently and Preserve Security

3534
Of your peers have already read this article.
2:48 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
At AirAsia, we operate a fleet of more than 270 aircraft across 23 markets, fly to more than 150 destinations and carry 100m guests each year. We’ve also been named the world’s best low-cost carrier for 11 years running. To accomplish all of this, we rely heavily on our 22,000 Allstars (employees). As AirAsia co-founder Tony Fernandes likes to say, “it has always been about the people.”
In my role as CIO, it’s critical that I give our Allstars the tools and technology they need to get their jobs done, while at the same time ensuring that our company’s data is protected and secure. While this is challenging enough in normal circumstances, we’re also in the midst of rapidly moving from legacy on-premises technologies to the cloud. Google Cloud has been a critical partner for us on this journey.
Identity challenges
AirAsia, like many other enterprises, has relied on a legacy on-premises directory for many years. As our company has quickly grown and expanded to new markets and regions, we’ve had to manage multiple servers across a number of on-premises data centers and the public cloud, which has proved costly and time-consuming.
Our Allstars, located all across Asia, need to easily access a number of legacy on-premises apps in addition to a growing number of SaaS apps. As a business, we also needed a more seamless integration between our HR system of record and our identity solution for user provisioning and lifecycle management. Solving these challenges with our existing on-premises directory was simply not feasible for us.
In recent years, we partnered with Google Cloud to help drive our digital transformation, including moving dozens of workloads and apps to Google Cloud Platform (GCP), deploying G Suite as our collaboration and productivity solution for all of our employees, and replacing thousands of Windows laptops with fast and secure Chromebooks.
We brought up our identity concerns with the Google Cloud team, and after a number of conversations, we decided to deploy Cloud Identity, Google’s cloud-based identity, and access management solution, to help address the identity challenges we were facing.
Why Cloud Identity for AirAsia?
We ended up choosing Cloud Identity for a few key reasons. Here at AirAsia, we are eager to move to the cloud as quickly as possible, and moving identity management to the cloud is a key enabler of this and our broader digital transformation. Managing identities from the cloud also enables us to have a single identity and set of credentials for each employee, which they can use to access all of the applications they need to be productive, both in the cloud and on-premises.
In addition, deploying Cloud Identity is a key step towards enabling the BeyondCorp (or zero trust) security model, which we feel is the best approach to strengthen our security posture and fight modern threats. Cloud Identity also integrates seamlessly with our existing technologies, which includes not only Google Cloud products like GCP, G Suite, and Chrome OS, but also third-party tools like Citrix, Papercut, and others.
And finally, Cloud Identity offered us significant cost and resource savings. With Cloud Identity in place, our IT department can spend less time worrying about managing multiple on-premises directory servers and can instead focus on delivering value to our Allstar employees.
5149
Of your peers have already watched this video.
18:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Trusted Collaboration for Hybrid Workplace with Google Workspace
Hybrid workspace need high levels of security, data privacy, and trust for seamless collaboration across workforce. As we navigate to the new normal, your enterprise can learn about the security and privacy specific innovations Google Workspace utilizes to help customers realize powerful, trusted, cloud-native collaboration.
Launches and Stories on Google Cloud Security from Q1: Fresh off the Boat!

2979
Of your peers have already read this article.
4:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
The security world keeps changing, with new tools and new threats in the ever-evolving arms race that is cybersecurity. To keep you up to speed on all that Google Cloud is doing to help safeguard your data and your applications, welcome to the first installment of the Security Roundup. In this regular series, I’ll be sharing a selection of news and guidance to help ensure you have the resources you need for your hectic, high-stakes harm-preventing job.
Applying the principle of least privilege to GKE clusters
Access to your GKE clusters – just like any other resource – should be based on the principle of least privilege. Use groups, individual roles, and Identity and Access Management tools to limit who can do what with your Kubernetes clusters in Google Cloud. These principles can help you control who uses which elements of the Kubernetes API as well as how they access your clusters. More details are in Anthony Bushong’s video.
Ensuring CI/CD pipeline security
To make sure only trusted code artifacts enter your continuous integration and deployment pipeline, you can take advantage of Binary Authorization on Google Cloud, and then only permit signed builds to go through. Learn more in Martin Omander’s video interview and walkthrough with XIaowen Lin.
Protecting against denial of service and flooding attacks
Once your applications are on the web, they become potential targets for attack. You can use Cloud Armor to protect against many types of traffic attacks, including distributed denial-of-service (DDoS), and HTTP POST flood attacks. After learning the normal traffic patterns of your apps, Cloud Armor monitors for anomalies and then generates alerts or intervenes on your behalf to block malicious traffic. Learn more with Arman Rye in this video.
Defending against cyberattacks with Palo Alto Networks
If you use Palo Alto Networks products for endpoint protection or network monitoring, now you can integrate the signals from those systems into Google Cloud security tools. You can ingest device health conclusions from Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR to boost your visibility into those endpoints’ state and improve your trust decisions. BeyondCorp Enterprise users can incorporate Cortex XDR metadata into access policies, leveraging additional posture information to add another level of trusted device information and operate with more confidence. Check out the details in this interview with Mason Yan at Palo Alto Networks.
Dealing with Apache Log4j 2 vulnerability(ies)
Attackers who exploit the Apache Log4j 2 vulnerability can execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable server. Read this post by the Google Cybersecurity Action Team for more details on log4j vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-44228 and CVE-2021-45046) and how you can find out if you’re affected. It includes advice for how to use Google Cloud products like Binary Authorization rules and Security Command Center to keep your cloud deployments safe.
Good luck out there, and remember: Keep your data yours!
Building Effective Visibility into Technology Assets Used in Healthcare

3183
Of your peers have already read this article.
4:00 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
When technology just works, it’s easy to trust. But too often, we place our trust in technology that doesn’t deserve it. When we do this with technology to provide healthcare, we put the safety of patients and the security and reliability of our global healthcare system at risk.
The institutions that make up our global healthcare system also place their trust in cybersecurity measures and technology to keep their systems running and repelling the unceasing wave of attacks they face. We often hear about the institutions that succumb to cyberattacks, but we don’t read much about the institutions that have been successful at defending their digital perimeter, and ultimately protected their ability to treat and protect patients.
Why were some institutions successful and others not as much? What cybersecurity capabilities made the healthcare institution resilient from these attacks? As we covered in our previous post on how healthcare can strengthen its cybersecurity resilience, establishing visibility and antifragility practices are necessary to repel attackers and build trust in the security and reliability of the technology our global healthcare system relies on.
As we continue our series on healthcare and cybersecurity, we’ll focus next on establishing sustainable visibility mechanisms so cybersecurity teams working in our global healthcare system can secure and preserve patient care and safety.
Visibility is akin to a patient taking 20 different medications but their doctor only knows about 10 of them. That’s the current state of many healthcare organizations’ relationship to the technology used on their networks and systems: They aren’t always aware of what technology is in use, whether it has vulnerabilities, how serious those vulnerabilities are, or how one weakness could lead to another or cascade out of control.
Visibility maps those technology assets (including the software, hardware, configurations, protections, who built it, and where the component parts come from) and help prioritize the importance of those assets in keeping systems and networks secure, no matter how complex the healthcare organization’s use of technology might be.
Building effective visibility
Building visibility into technology assets requires a structured approach. As mentioned in the first blog in this series, using a guide like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) provides an important mental model we can use to get a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of an organization’s cybersecurity risk profile, and how it applies to the assets the organization seeks to protect.
Cybersecurity author and leader Sounil Yu’s book Cyber Defense Matrix provides an important interpretation of the NIST CSF framework that can help us better understand what visibility we have into technology assets and how they are protected. Visibility is about more than just seeing all assets we have all at once. It’s also about understanding which assets are mission-critical and must be protected at all costs versus which ones are perhaps important but less crucial overall. Without the right balance, we end up trying to protect everything while not protecting what matters enough. This is where structural awareness comes in.
Structural awareness, or the conscious understanding and state of an organization’s assets, is established as one implements controls captured in the NIST CSF functions Identify and Protect. These controls focus on identifying assets, their bill of materials, their creators, their dependencies on other assets, the protections and vulnerabilities they have, and the threats they face. While visibility helps create an accurate map of technology assets, structural awareness builds on that visibility and answers questions such as, “What are the ways the threat actor could compromise that asset? What could be lost? How would it most likely happen? Would I know?”
Yu says that structural awareness is efficiently achieved with the help of automation, and is not as people-intensive as many practitioners, decision-makers, and executives might think. If a cyberattack is like an explosion, cybersecurity teams’ structural awareness helps them understand how the explosion could happen before (or ‘left of’) it goes ‘boom’.
It’s also important to remember that while structural awareness is related to situational awareness in some ways, they are different concepts. Situational awareness refers to mechanisms that are used to detect and respond to an event. Structural awareness mechanisms are ‘left of boom,’ or mechanisms that protect your assets so that events don’t happen. The goal is to stay ‘left of boom’ and avoid being ‘right of boom’. Being proactive in your protections and being ready to respond in either case is really important, nonetheless.

Thinking about assets in terms of users, devices, networks, applications and workloads and data (asset classes), and adopting mechanisms to discover assets of each type through visibility controls suggested by the NIST CSF, will lead to developing structural awareness. Structural awareness can help avoid the boom, but if the boom does happen, it can also help shape the situational awareness needed to react. The Cyber Defense Matrix is an ongoing project, and you can read more about it (and contribute to it) here.
Framing asset discovery for resilience
Cybersecurity teams must map out their organizations’ most critical healthcare services and systems that support them, but that’s easier said than done. Asset discovery can feel overwhelming. Trying to find, count, and audit the hardware, software, users, and data down to the component across even a small part of one’s technology footprint can feel like pushing a dead car up a steep hill. The way to make this easier is to prioritize this effort in the parts of the business where the impact of a quality or safety issue has the potential to create the most harm to the organization and those who depend on it.
A smart place to begin the process to find and evaluate the measurements that an institution uses to monitor those processes.
Healthcare providers: Start with the quality and safety measurements which must be submitted to various regulatory agencies in order to maintain licenses to operate.
- Health insurers: Look at the performance improvement metrics used to ensure subscriber benefits, quality requirements, and legal mandates are being met.
- Health IT services: Use service level agreements for measuring contract compliance with things like uptime, recovery time and point objectives, and response turnarounds.
- Life sciences organizations: Begin with the relevant Good Practice definitions and the metrics used to monitor quality and safety levels of products and services.
When analyzing the types of technology unique to healthcare – like network-connected medical devices such as infusion pumps, implantable pacemakers, ventilators, EKG equipment, and MRI machines – it’s important to ask what are the immediate safety hazards if there was a cyberattack. Not sure how to answer that question? The International Medical Device Regulators Forum produced a risk categorization model that could be helpful in framing that response. Operational technology, like blood bank and sample refrigerators, climate control, air handling, infection control and pneumatic tube systems, may also be used to identify and prioritize inventory efforts.
Once priorities have been set, teams can begin gathering data on critical services, the owners of those services, the systems those owners rely on, and the technology itself.
Inventory tactics on Google Cloud
Building service-technology mapping is not a one-time exercise. Organizations should take the time to automate inventory creation and maintenance, so they can maintain an up-to-date view of all the items in their environment at any given time. This is especially for organizations that have highly dynamic environments.
Google Cloud provides best practices on discovering and cataloging assets in its Cloud Architecture Center. Implement controls found in the Identity and Protect categories using the NIST Framework & Google Cloud technical paper. Automation is your friend when building and maintaining a complete and accurate inventory. Google Cloud Asset Inventory and Security Command Center can be used to inventory a variety of resources running in Google Cloud. Cloud Build, Google Cloud’s CI/CD platform, implements SLSA 1 and provides a trustworthy audit of software artifacts deployed through a managed pipeline. Cloud DLP inventories and labels data stored on Google Cloud Storage and services like BigQuery.
Meanwhile, a number of Google Cloud Marketplace partners have solutions that can help build a comprehensive inventory, and innovation continues to improve our technological options. One emerging field of security technology, called attack surface management, helps discover previously-unknown assets. Finally, our next blog on resilience discusses how to use a software bill of materials (also known by the breezy acronym SBOM) to gain visibility and structural awareness into applications.
It’s important to remember that when starting down this path, the goal is not to gain 100% visibility into every single component on every single device attached to every network supporting every service running. Success or failure is not achieved when the inventory process has reached an arbitrarily-determined ‘percentage complete.’ We want to prioritize expanding visibility and developing structural awareness on assets where safety and quality are at risk, so we can improve their resilience.
And finally, we feel it’s important to emphasize that in the past, healthcare industries have focused mainly on protecting the confidentiality of data. While that’s important, we must evolve security programs beyond protecting confidentiality as its primary (and some cases, only) focus.
To be resilient, we must design and build cybersecurity capabilities that deliver safety, integrity, and availability of the technology that cares for patients directly. As we gain visibility into the technology we depend on to keep us healthy, we improve our understanding about which parts of it we can trust, and which parts we can’t. Improving visibility is an important early step on our path to resilience.
reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention: Stop Payment Fraud with Google’s Intelligence

1143
Of your peers have already read this article.
3:30 Minutes
The most insightful time you'll spend today!
Today, we are putting the power of Google’s insights and intelligence in the hands of risk, fraud, and security teams everywhere. We are pleased to announce the general availability of reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention, a new product that uses Google’s own fraud models, machine learning, and intelligence from protecting more than 6 million websites to help stop payment fraud.
reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention can help protect payment transactions by identifying targeted manual attacks and large-scale fraud attempts. It automatically trains fraud models based on behavior and transaction data to identify events that are likely fraudulent and could cause a dispute or chargeback if accepted.
When threat actors are identified and blocked on any site in the reCAPTCHA network, the intelligence is made available to help protect other organizations from those same attackers. Organizations can then use the scores to send the transaction for manual review or directly block suspicious transactions, drive increased trust in their legitimate transactions, reduce the amount of friction for good users, and reduce erroneous rejection rates.
“Being a safe and trusted place to give and receive help is our top priority. We are constantly innovating, refining and enhancing our fraud defenses and Google’s reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention adds another layer of industry-leading protection for our users. Combining Google’s rich security expertise with GoFundMe’s focus on fraud prevention is already showing promising results as we strive to keep our platform the safest place to give online,” said Matthew Murray, director of risk, GoFundMe.
According to data obtained from our customers using reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention in private Preview, the new solution can help drive comprehensive value for organizations by:
- Reducing fraud losses: Get behavior modeling (not just mouse movements), stop financial damage created by account takeovers (ATOs), and connect fraud and abuse intelligence across your site and application.
- Increasing legitimate sales: Fraud Prevention can help businesses increase their revenue by providing insights to understand who good users are, who may otherwise be caught in an overly aggressive, customer restrictive fraud model.*
These benefits are enabled for organizations by:
- Preventing advanced attacks: Stopping sophisticated attacks in an environment where attackers use cloud fraud infrastructure, and data leaks, virtual cards and VPN usage are on the rise
- Increasing trust in good transactions: Focus on good approval rates through a unique combination of supervised and unsupervised models
- Improving customer experience: By preventing fraudulent transactions with zero user friction, Fraud Prevention can help businesses protect legitimate users and increase customer retention
Our customers have used these new capabilities in preview in customer experiences that include online checkouts and payment transactions. Fraud Prevention has been used by merchants and payment processors to block millions of dollars in fraudulent transactions in a frictionless way.
reCAPTCHA Enterprise provides a comprehensive online fraud detection platform that helps prevent fraudulent, spammy, and abusive digital client activity across your web and application footprint. This platform includes Account Defender, which protects users from account takeovers (ATO), frictionless bot management capabilities, and password leak detection to identify compromised accounts. With an additional API call for Fraud Prevention, organizations can leverage a comprehensive solution to secure financial transactions along with core reCAPTCHA Enterprise capabilities.
To get started, organizations can install a score-based site key on each part of the payment user flow front end and send transaction data when a purchase occurs. This site key helps train site-specific fraud models and start returning fraud scores for each transaction.
Ready to put reCAPTCHA Enterprise Fraud Prevention to work? Contact our fraud specialists or your customer success CSM team and sign up with the free tier. You learn more about these new capabilities in reCAPTCHA Enterprise in our product documentation. You can also register for our webinar where our experts will be discussing this capability in great detail on June 1, 2023.
Coming up at our Security Summit on June 13-14, you can hear how reCAPTCHA Enterprise helped GoFundMe secure their donors from fraud. Sign up here for free Security Summit registration.
More Relevant Stories for Your Company

Best Practices for Cost Optimization in the Cloud
When customers migrate to Google Cloud Platform (GCP), their first step is often to adopt Compute Engine, which makes it easy to procure and set up virtual machines (VMs) in the cloud that provide large amounts of computing power. Launched in 2012, Compute Engine offers multiple machine types, many innovative features, and is available in

Best Kept Security Secrets: How to Resolve Cloud Trust Paradox with Cloud EKM
Whether driven by government policy, industry regulation, or geo-political considerations, the evolution of cloud computing has led organizations to want even more control over their data and more transparency from their cloud services. At Google Cloud, one of the best tools for achieving that level of control and transparency is

Efficient, Safe and Dynamic Gaming Experience: Aristocrat’s Digital Journey on Google Cloud
Since Aristocrat’s founding in 1953, technology has constantly transformed gaming and the digital demands on our gaming business are a far cry from challenges we faced when we started. As we continue to expand globally, security and compliance are top priorities. Managing IT security for several gaming subsidiaries and our

How Google Workspace Helps Manage, Govern and Protect Sensitive Data
The shift towards a hybrid work style and trends accelerated by the pandemic has resulted in data deluge. With companies and individuals sharing increasingly large volumes of information and collaborating with internal and external stakeholders, the need for innovations for higher security also escalates. View this video to learn how






