The past year has given everyone lots to think about—about our priorities as people and as businesses. As the world retreated behind closed doors, we saw how shared interests and experiences can bring us together. As the world grappled with a common enemy, we witnessed just how differently individuals, communities and indeed entire countries can experience a situation. And as we faced seemingly unending obstacles to making it through the pandemic, we saw how making smart decisions based on data can drive meaningful solutions—fast.

That’s why we here at Google Cloud are so proud to partner Univision, the country’s leading Spanish-language content and media company. By partnering with Google Cloud, Univision will be able to accelerate growth across its portfolio of properties, deliver an enhanced user experience for Spanish-speaking audiences and provide the enterprise solutions needed to create the Spanish-language media company of the future.

According to Instituto Cervantes, there are over 580 million Spanish language speakers worldwide. Those viewers, like people everywhere, are avid consumers of streaming content. In Q4 of 2020 alone, viewing time for that content increased by 44%¹, and in 2020, from 50%² more sources. With that surge in demand, Univision needed a cloud provider whose infrastructure could reach Hispanic viewers around the world. With two-plus decades spent building out its network and data centers, as well as global content-delivery capabilities, Google Cloud has the infrastructure Univision needs to reach viewers across the Spanish-speaking world.

At the same time, with such a diverse audience for their content, Univision needs to target that content to viewers’ specific preferences. By applying Google Cloud’s artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technology across its content, Univision intends to personalize content based on shows users have previously watched, enhancing their engagement and viewing experience. 

And as Univision transforms the user experience, it can use Google Cloud’s data and analytics suite to garner deeper insights into its audience and forge stronger relationships with them on an individual basis. With Looker and BigQuery, Univision employees will have access to real-time data to help them make business decisions about programming.

Univision will also migrate video distribution and production operations to Google Cloud, where we’ll help them streamline media workflows and develop innovative new capabilities. Meanwhile, Google Cloud’s tight business and technical integration with other Google services will help ensure Univision reaches viewers on the device of their choice, wherever they are in the world. For example, in the coming years, Univision will expand its global YouTube partnership and will integrate with entertainment features on Google Search that help people better discover TV shows and movies. The company will also use Google Ad Manager for global ad decisioning and Google’s Dynamic Ad Insertion for PrendeTV and future video-on-demand offerings. Finally, Univision will distribute its content and services on Google Play across Android phones and tablets, as well as Google TV and other Android TV OS devices.

We’re thrilled to partner with Univision to help them reach the Spanish-speaking world with their content. With our cloud portfolio, we can help them reach individual viewers around the world, with personalized content that they can consume however they see fit. Best of all, together, we can help them achieve this vision fast, leveraging established cloud, content delivery, and data analytics technologies. You can learn more about the partnership here.

Digital transformation and migration to the cloud are top priorities for a lot of enterprises. At Google Cloud, we’re working hard to make this journey easier. For example, we recently launched Migrate for Compute Engine and Migrate for Anthos to simplify cloud migration and modernization. These services have helped customers like Cardinal Health perform successful, large-scale migrations to GCP. 

But we understand that the migration journey can be daunting. To make things easier, we developed a whitepaper on application migration featuring investigative processes and advice to help you design an effective migration and modernization strategy. This guide outlines the four basic steps you need to follow to migrate successfully and efficiently:  

1. Build an inventory of your applications and infrastructure: Understanding how many items, such as applications and hardware appliances, exist in your current environment is an important first step.
2. Categorize your applications: Analyze the characteristics of all of your applications and evaluate them across two dimensions: migration to cloud, and modernization.
3. Decide whether or not to migrate an application to the cloud: Not all applications should move to the cloud quite yet. The whitepaper lists the questions to ask to determine whether or not to migrate a given application.
4. Pick your migration strategy: For the applications you decided to migrate, decide on your ideal strategy—pure lift and shift, containers, cloud managed services, or a combination thereof.

There’s a lot to consider when you start thinking about digital transformation, and every cloud modernization project has its nuances and unique considerations. The secret to success is understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the options at your disposal, and weighing them against what you want to transform and why. To learn how to migrate and modernize your applications with Google Cloud, download this whitepaper.

The capability gap between hyperscale cloud providers has begun to narrow; however, fierce competition for enterprise workloads extends to secondary markets worldwide. Infrastructure and operations leaders should evaluate cloud providers with a broad range of use cases and a wide market presence.

Market Definition/Description

Cloud computing is a style of computing in which scalable and elastic IT-enabled capabilities are delivered as a service using internet technologies. Cloud infrastructure and platform services (CIPS) are defined as standardized, highly automated offerings, in which infrastructure resources (e.g., compute, networking and storage) are complemented by integrated platform services. These include managed application, database and functions as-a-service offerings. The resources are scalable and elastic in near-real time and are metered by use. Self-service interfaces are exposed directly to the customer, including a web-based user interface (UI) and an API. The resources may be single-tenant or multitenant, and can be hosted by a service provider or on-premises in the customer’s data center.The scope of this Magic Quadrant has changed, compared with its predecessor, the “Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure as a Service.” Gartner has developed this Magic Quadrant to reflect the changing dynamics of cloud services offered and the ways that enterprise customers adopt them. Ultimately, hyperscale cloud providers, and the broad array of services they offer beyond infrastructure as a service (IaaS), have found strategic importance in Gartner’s enterprise clients and the Magic Quadrant needed to evolve to reflect as much.The scope of the Magic Quadrant for CIPS includes IaaS and integrated platform as a service (PaaS) platforms. These include application PaaS (aPaaS), functions as a service (FaaS), database PaaS (dbPaaS), application developer PaaS (adPaaS) and industrialized private cloud offerings that are often deployed in enterprise data centers.

Understanding the Vendor Profiles, Strengths and Cautions

CIPS providers that target enterprise and midmarket customers generally offer high-quality service, with excellent availability, good performance, high security and good customer support. Exceptions will be noted in this Magic Quadrant’s evaluations of individual providers. When we say “all providers,” we specifically mean “all the evaluated providers included in this Magic Quadrant,” not all CIPS providers in general. Keep the following in mind when reading the vendor profiles:

• All the providers have public cloud IaaS and PaaS offerings. Most also offer, or are in the process of building, industrialized private cloud offerings, in which every customer is on standardized infrastructure and cloud management tools. In some cases, the provider’s industrialized, on-premises offering may share similarities to hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), but tethered to the cloud. However, this may not resemble the provider’s public cloud service in architecture or quality. A single architecture and feature set and cross-cloud management, for both public and private CIPS, make it easier for customers to combine and migrate across service models as their needs dictate. They also enable the provider to use its engineering investments more effectively. Gartner is beginning to describe the notion of cloud-provider-managed infrastructure, wherever it may exist, as “ distributed cloud.”
• All the providers target midmarket businesses and enterprises, as well as other companies that use technology at scale. Some of the providers may also target small businesses and startups. Just because a provider targets a segment, however, does not necessarily mean that it is well-suited to that segment’s needs. Furthermore, not all providers have the capacity to serve very-large-scale customers, and some have capacity constraints in particular regions.
• All the providers offer basic cloud IaaS — compute, storage and networking resources as a service. They also offer additional value-added capabilities, notably cloud software infrastructure services — typically middleware and databases as a service — including PaaS capabilities. These services, along with IT operations management (ITOM) capabilities as a service (especially DevOps-related services), are a vital differentiator in the market, especially for Mode 2 agile IT buyers.
• All the providers claim to have high security standards. However, the extent of the security controls provided to customers varies significantly. All the providers evaluated can offer solutions that will meet common regulatory compliance needs, unless otherwise noted. All the providers have undergone SOC 1, SOC 2 and SOC 3 audits, as well as SSAE 16, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017 and ISO/IEC 27018 audits. This provides a relatively high level of assurance that the providers are adhering to generally accepted practices for the security of their systems, but it does not address the extent of controls offered to customers.
• Security is a shared responsibility. Customers need to correctly configure controls, and they may need to supply additional controls beyond what their providers offer. Furthermore, providers vary in their degree of transparency as to how services are architected, although customers typically have access to third-party assessment reports under a nondisclosure agreement (NDA).

• Monthly compute availability service-level agreements (SLAs) of 99.95% and higher are generally the norm. They are typically higher than availability SLAs for managed hosting. Service credits for outages in a given month are typically capped at 100% of the monthly bill; however, some providers have caps as low as 25%. This availability percentage is typically non-negotiable, because it is based on an engineering estimate of the underlying infrastructure reliability.
• Single-instance compute SLAs have become common for providers in this Magic Quadrant. It might be more accurate to say that there are usually two SLAs — one for the compute service, and one for individual instances. Some providers have a compute availability SLA that requires customers to use compute capabilities in at least two fault domains (sometimes known as “availability zones” or the like).
• Many providers have additional SLAs. These cover network availability and performance, customer service responsiveness and other service aspects.
• Infrastructure resources are not normally automatically replicated into multiple data centers. Customers are responsible for their own business continuity. Some providers offer optional disaster recovery solutions.
• All providers offer per-second metering of virtual machines (VMs). Some can offer shorter metering increments, which can be more cost-effective for short-term batch jobs. Unless otherwise noted, providers charge on a per-VM basis.
• Providers are increasingly offering bare-metal physical servers on a dynamic basis. These are priced by the second. Providers with a bare-metal option are noted as such.
• All the providers partner with carrier-neutral colocation exchanges. This enables customers to obtain connectivity from a variety of carriers that are located in these facilities. In addition, many customers require a small amount of supplemental colocation in low-latency proximity with their cloud provider. For example, they may have a large-scale database, specialized network equipment or legacy equipment, such as a mainframe.
• Some providers offer software marketplaces. In these marketplaces, software vendors specially license and package their software to run on that provider’s cloud IaaS offering. Marketplace software can be automatically installed, and can be billed through the provider, although the software vendor often provides support.
• All providers offer enterprise-class support with 24/7 customer service. This is provided via phone, email and chat, along with an account manager. Some offer a lower level of support, but allow customers to pay extra for enterprise-class support.
• All the providers will sign contracts with customers, can invoice and can consolidate bills from multiple accounts. All providers offer online sign-up and credit card billing, because they recognize that enterprise buyers prefer contracts and invoices. Some will sign “zero dollar” contracts that do not commit a customer to a certain volume.
• Some providers will sign a U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Business Associate Agreement (HIPAA BAA).
• Unless otherwise noted, all providers will sign the following contract addendums:
  • An EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) data-processing agreement (DPA), which includes the model clauses
  • An EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) DPA
• Managed and professional services are an optional but important accelerator for customer success. Almost all providers rely heavily on managed service providers (MSPs) and system integration (SI) partners for these services. However, most providers offer their own first-party professional services and some also offer first-party managed services offerings.
• All of the evaluated providers offer a portal, documentation, technical support, customer support and contracts in English. Some can provide one or more of these in languages other than English. Most providers can conduct business in local languages.

The service provider descriptions are accurate as of the time of publication. Our technical evaluation of service features took place between January 2020 and March 2020.

Format of the Vendor Descriptions

When describing each provider, we first summarize the nature of the company, then provide information about its industrialized cloud IaaS offerings in the following format:

• Locations: Cloud data center locations by country, languages in which the company does business and languages in which technical support can be conducted.
• Recommended Uses: These are the circumstances under which we recommend the provider. They are not the only circumstances in which it may be a useful provider, but they are the scenarios for which, in Gartner’s opinion, the provider is well-suited.

For a detailed technical description of CIPS offerings, along with a use-case-focused technical evaluation, see “Critical Capabilities for Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Services, Worldwide.”We also provide a detailed list of evaluation criteria in “Solution Criteria for Cloud Integrated IaaS and PaaS.” A detailed assessment of each provider against these criteria can be found in the Solution Scorecards. The results are also available in Gartner’s Cloud Decisions portal (see “Cloud Decisions’ Cloud Compare: Perform Real-Time IaaS Pricing and Performance Analysis”).

Magic Quadrant

Figure 1. Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Services

Vendor Strengths and Cautions

Google

Google is a Leader in this Magic Quadrant.

Locations: Google has multiple regions across Japan and the U.S., as well as a presence in Belgium, Singapore, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, the U.K., India, Australia, Brazil, Canada and, Switzerland, as well as the Hong Kong and Taiwan markets.

Recommended Uses: Google has evolved by enhancing its strengths and attacking its limitations to providing a strong offering in every use case, other than the edge use case. Google has a future focus on building out hybrid capabilities and partnerships with telco providers.

Strengths

• Google’s open-source contributions, such as Kubernetes and TensorFlow, have been market-moving innovations that have changed the course of enterprise IT. Such innovations have served to enable other cloud service providers, but also brought developer “mind share” to Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Google’s long-term strategy is to bring additional open-source-focused partners into GCP as managed services.
• During the past year, GCP has experienced a noticeable increase in year-over-year market share in terms of IaaS and dbPaaS, albeit from a lower base, relative to other providers in this Magic Quadrant. Google has also made significant gains by closing a number of critical capability gaps between GCP and Microsoft Azure, its nearest competitor in terms of market share and capabilities.
• Gartner clients continue to associate GCP with its big data and data science capabilities, stemming from the use of services such BigQuery and Dataproc. However, the company is pressing into new territory with Anthos, GCP’s container and Kubernetes-based middleware layer, which is designed to support the development and deployment of cloud applications in a hybrid and multicloud model.

Cautions

• Some of Gartner’s clients remain cautious about Google’s commitment to serving the needs of enterprise clients when put in the context of SAP’s preference for Microsoft Azure, and GCP’s slowness in executing on some highly touted partnerships. GCP lacks enterprise-focused aPaaS capabilities and support for Oracle, and it continues to struggle with having an enterprise mindset in the field.
• From a financial perspective, GCP’s revenue is a small fraction of overall Google revenue and GCP’s criticality to the overall business is not as clear as its competitors. Furthermore, GCP’s success may erode the company’s overall healthy gross margins.
• Google’s much-vaunted network capabilities have been the source of a number of GCP outages during the last year, with devastating impact on customers. One outage was multiregional in scope, affecting GCP customers and Google consumer services, such as G Suite and YouTube. This resulted in complete GCP network unavailability for some customers.