As a product with a long history in the database ecosystem, SQL Server offers numerous native capabilities that help provide scalability and security to its users.  However, it can be time consuming and complex to take advantage of these features. Google Cloud SQL for SQL Server saves your team time by eliminating much of the unnecessary toil (OS patching, version upgrades, replica setup etc.) while still allowing you to leverage the functionality you’re used to. Three new features for Cloud SQL for SQL Server take its functionality even further. 

A few months ago, we announced Active Directory (AD) integration had entered preview; now, it is generally available. Equally exciting, we are releasing Cross-Region Replicas (based on SQL Server’s Always On Availability Groups) in preview.  Finally, you can try out this great new functionality in our managed database service with the latest release of SQL Server 2019, which is now generally available.  

Simple and Secure Windows Authentication with Active Directory

As one of the most requested and critical security capabilities for Cloud SQL for SQL Server, we are pleased to now provide Windows Authentication via Managed Service for Microsoft Active Directory as generally available. Customers should feel confident onboarding their business critical production workloads to the managed service while still maintaining the authentication best practices they rely on today.  While identities can be created and managed directly within the managed AD service, many customers choose to establish a trust relationship with their existing on-prem AD footprint to leverage existing identity objects.

What is Cross-Region Replica for SQL Server?

Bringing parity in the Cloud SQL portfolio alongside MySQL and PostgreSQL, Cross-region replica makes it easy to create a fully managed read replica in a different region than that of the primary instance. You can create a replica in any Google Cloud region.  The difference for SQL Server is the Availability Group based architecture that paves the way for the service to continue to offer more core compatibility with the SQL Server features our customers depend on. Cloud SQL greatly simplifies the traditional process of provisioning Availability Groups and streamlines it into a few-step workflow.

Using read replicas will allow you to horizontally scale your read workloads. For example, you can configure a reporting dashboard to work against a read replica, and because it’s only reading, it will not affect the primary instance. You can also promote replicas to be Cloud SQL instances and that could help you reduce your recovery point objective (RPO) and recovery time objective (RTO). It can help you with the RPO because the data is constantly replicated and the replica is probably more up to date than your latest backup. It can help you with RTO because promoting the replica, especially in an automated way, is a relatively short process. To get started, check out the documentation for Cross-Region Replica

What’s new in SQL Server 2019?

Providing the most current major and minor versions is a key aspect of maintaining compatibility and security for your database workload. Cloud SQL provides an easy provisioning experience that will now allow you to select from four editions of SQL Server 2019 similar to our current SQL Server 2017 options of Enterprise, Standard, Web, and Express. A few key considerations as you are evaluating the new version should be:

• Compatibility level – A newly created database on a Cloud SQL for SQL Server 2019 Databases instance has a compatibility level of 150 by default.  
• Accelerated Database Recovery – Allows instances to reduce the availability impact of restarts and shutdowns.
• TempDB changes – While we recently provided you more control to manage your tempdb files, 2019 also brings optimization to improve performance as well.
• Intelligent query processing – SQL Server 2019 provides direct improvements to the query engine itself which may improve overall query processing and performance.
• Many other performance improvements – capabilities such as verbose truncation warnings, resumable index build, and others.  Learn more about supported features here.

To get started, check out documentation for  SQL Server 2019. 

In conclusion

These three features have been the most common requests from our enterprise customers. Finally, you can bring your own Active Directory domain for SQL Server authentication and authorization, use the latest features from SQL Server 2019 and scale your read workloads as well as leveraging the cross regional replicas for faster disaster-recovery.

To get started, check out the documentation for Cross-Region Replica, Active Directory, and SQL Server 2019. All are available with any new instance created via the console or API, simply follow the instructions in the documentation.

Every organization has its own unique data culture and capabilities. Yet each is expected to use technology trends and solutions in the same way as everyone else. Your organization may be built on years of legacy applications, you may have developed a considerable amount of expertise and knowledge, yet you may be asked to adopt a new approach based on a technology trend. On the other hand, you may be on the other side of the spectrum, a digitally native organization built with engineering principles from scratch without legacy systems but expected to follow the same principles as process driven, established organizations. The question is, should we treat these organizations in the same way when it comes to data processing? In this series of blogs and papers this is what we are exploring: how to set up an organization from the first principles from data analyst, data engineering and data science point of view. In reality, there is no such organization that is solely driven by one of these but it is likely to be a combination of multiple types. What type of organization you become is then driven by how much you are influenced by each of these principles. 

When you are considering what data processing technology encompasses, take a step back and make a strategic decision based on your key goals. This can be whether you optimize for performance, cost, reduction in operational overhead, increase in operational excellence, integration of new analytical and machine learning approaches. Or perhaps you’re looking to leverage existing employees’ skills while meeting all your data governance and regulatory requirements. We will be exploring these different themes and will focus on how they guide your decision-making process. You may be coming from technologies which are solving some of the past problems and some of the terminologies may be more familiar, however they don’t scale your capabilities. There is also the opportunity cost of prioritizing legacy and new issues that arise from a transformation effort, and as a result your new initiative can set you further behind on your core business while you play catch up to an ever changing technology landscape. 

Data value chain

The key for any ingestion and transformation tool is to extract data from a source and start acting on it. The ultimate goal is to reduce the complexity and increase the timeliness of the data. Without data, it is impossible to create a data driven organization and act on the insights. As a result, data needs to be transformed, enriched, joined with other data sources, and aggregated to make better decisions. In other words, insights on good timely data mean good decisions.

While deciding on the data ingestion pipeline, one of the best approaches is to look into the volume of data, the velocity of the data, and type of data that is arriving. Other considerations include the number of different data sources you are managing, whether you need to scale to thousands of sources using generic pipelines, whether you want to create one generic pipeline but then apply data quality rules and governance. ETL tools are ideal for this use case as generic pipelines can be written and then parameterized. 

On the other hand, consider the data source. Can the data be directly ingested without transforming and formatting the data? If the data does not need to be transformed and can be ingested directly into the data warehouse as a managed solution. This not only reduces the operational costs but also allows for more timely data delivery. If the data is coming in through an unstructured format such as XML or in a format such as EBCDIC and needs to be transformed and formatted, then a tool with ETL Capabilities can be used depending on the speed of the data arrival. 

It is also important to understand the speed and time of arrival of the data. Think about your SLAs and time durations/windows that are relevant for your data ingestion plans. This would not only drive the ingestion profiles but would also dictate which framework to use. As discussed above, velocity requirements would drive the decision-making process.

Type of Organization

Different organizations can be successful by employing different strategies based on the talent that they have. Just like in sports, each team plays with a different strategy with the ultimate goal of winning. 

Organizations often need to decide on what’s the best strategy to take in respect to data ingestion and processing – whether you need to hire an expensive group of data engineers, or exploit your data wizards and analysts to enrich and transform data that can be acted on, or whether it would be more realistic to train the current workforce to do more functional/high value work rather than to focus on building generally understood and available foundational pieces.

On the other hand, the transformation part of ETL pipelines as we know it, dictates where the load will be. All of these are made a reality in the cloud native world where data can be enriched, aggregated, and joined. Loading data into a powerful and modern data warehouse means that you can already join and enrich the data using ELT. Consequently, ETL isn’t really needed in its strict terms anymore if the data can be loaded directly into the data warehouse.

All of the above was not possible in the traditional, siloed, and static data warehouses and data ecosystems whereby systems would not talk to each other or there were capacity constraints in respect to both storing and processing the data in the expensive Data Warehouse. This is no longer the case in the BigQuery world as storage is now cheap and transformations are now much more capable without constraints of virtual appliances. 

If your organization is already heavily invested into an ETL tool, one option is to use them to load BigQuery and transform the data initially within the ETL tool. Once the as-is and to-be are verified to be matching, then with the improved knowledge and expertise one can start moving workloads into BigQuery SQL, and effectively do ELT. 

Furthermore, if your organization is coming from a more traditional data warehouse that extensively relies on stored procedures and scripting, then the question that one may ask is, do I continue leveraging these skills and expertise and use these capabilities that are also provided in BigQuery? ELT with BigQuery is more natural, similar to what’s already in Teradata BTEQ, Oracle PL/SQL but migrating from ETL to ELT requires changes. This change then enables exploiting streaming use cases, such as real-time use cases in retail. This is because there is no preceding step before data is loaded and made available.

Organizations can be broadly classified under 3 types as Data Analyst Driven, Data Engineering driven, and Blended organization. We will be covering a Data Science driven organization within the Blended category.   

Data Analyst Driven

Analysts understand the business and are used to using SQL/spreadsheets. Allowing them to do advanced analytics through interfaces that they are accustomed to enables scaling. As a result, easy to use ETL tooling to bring data quickly into the target system becomes a key driver. Ingesting data directly from a source or staging area then also becomes critical as it allows analysts to exploit their key skills using ELT and increases timeliness of the data. This is commonplace with traditional EDWs and realized by extended capabilities of using Stored Procedures and Scripting. Data is enriched, transformed, and cleansed using SQL and ETL tools act as the orchestration tools. 

The capabilities brought by cloud computing on separation of data and computation changes the face of the EDW as well. Rather than creating complex ingestion pipelines, the role of the ingestion becomes, bringing data close to the cloud, staging on a storage bucket or on a messaging system before being ingested into the cloud EDW. This then releases data analysts to focus on looking into data insights using tools and interfaces that they are accustomed to. 

Data Engineering / Data Science Driven 

Building complex data engineering pipelines is expensive but enables increased capabilities. This allows creating repeatable processes and scaling the number of sources. Once complemented with cloud it enables agile data processing methodologies. On the other hand, data science organizations allow carrying out experiments and producing applications that work for specific use cases but are not often productionised or generalized. 

Real-time analytics enables immediate responses and there are specific use cases where low latency anomaly detection applications are required to run. In other words, business requirements would be such that it has to be acted upon as the data arrives on the fly. Processing this type of data or application requires transformation done outside of the target.

All the above usually requires custom applications or state-of-the-art tooling which is achieved by organizations that excel with their engineering capabilities. In reality, there are very few organizations that can be truly engineering organizations. Many fall into what we call here as the blended organization.  

Blended org

The above classification can be used on tool selection for each project. For example, rather than choosing a single tool, choose the right tool for the right workload, because this would reduce operational cost, license cost and use the best of the tools available. Let the deciding factor be driven by business requirements: each business unit or team would know the applications they need to connect with to get valuable business insights. This coupled with the data maturity of the organization would be the key to making sure the right data processing tool would be the right fit. 

In reality, you are likely to be somewhere on a spectrum. Digital native organizations are likely to be closer to being engineering driven, due to their culture and business that they are in. However, brick and mortar organizations would be closer to being analyst driven due to the significant number of legacy systems and processes they possess. These organizations are either considering or working toward digital transformation with an aspiration of having a data engineering / software engineering culture like Google. 

The blended organization with strong skills around data engineering, would have built the platform and built frameworks, to increase reusable patterns would increase productivity and then reduce costs. Data engineers focus on running Spark on Kubernetes whereas infrastructure engineers focus on container work. This in turn provides unparalleled capabilities as application developers focus on the data pipelines and even the underlying technologies or platforms changes code stays the same. As a result, security issues, latency requirements, cost demands and portability are addressed at multiple layers. 

Conclusion – What type of organization are you?

Often an organization’s infrastructure is not flexible enough to react to a fast changing technological landscape. Whether you are part of an organization which is engineering driven or analyst driven, organizations frequently look at technical requirements that inform which architecture to implement. But a key, and frequently overlooked, component needed to truly become a data-driven organization is the impact of the architecture on your data users. When you take into account the responsibilities, skill sets, and trust of your data users, you can create the right data platform to meet the needs of your IT department as well as your business.

To become a truly data-driven organization, the first step is to design and implement an analytics data platform that meets your technical and business needs. The reality is that each organization is different and has a different culture, different skills, and capabilities. Key is to leverage its strengths to stay competitive while adopting new technologies when it is needed and as it fits to your organization. 

To learn more about the elements of how to build an analytics data platform depending on the organization you are, read our paper here.

Database migration to a new database platform or technology can be daunting for various reasons. One of the common concerns is database performance. It is hard to evaluate database performance early in the evaluation cycle without performing actual data migration and application changes. This becomes even more important in the case of Cloud Spanner where modernization is required at both the database and application layers. 

The traditional approach to evaluate database performance is to deploy the application and database together, migrate historical data to the new database and then simulate load tests by running an application on the new database. Doing all this for an early performance evaluation of Cloud Spanner may feel like a lot of effort.

In this post, we will explore a middle ground to performance testing using JMeter. Performance test Cloud Spanner for a custom workload before making application code changes and executing data migration. More detailed step-by-step guide is published here.

Goals

• Estimate the number of Cloud Spanner nodes needed (and get a cost estimate).
• Performance test the most frequently used set of queries and transactions.
• Demonstrate the ability to scale horizontally.
• Better understand the optimizations needed for schema and sql queries.
• Determine latency of DML operations.

Limitations

• You cannot test using non-java client libraries.
• It is more complex to test non-jdbc compliant features like mutations, parallel reads etc.

Preparing for performance tests

1. Identify top SQL queries, latency, frequency / hour and avg number of rows returned or updated for each. This information will also serve as a baseline for the current system.
2. Determine Cloud Spanner region / multi-region deployment. Ideally, load should be generated from the Cloud Spanner instance’s leader region for minimum latency and best performance. Read Demystifying Cloud Spanner multi-region configurations for more details on various configurations of Cloud Spanner.
3. Estimate the number of Cloud Spanner nodes required for a given workload based on (step 1). It is recommended to have a minimum of 2 nodes for linear scaling.
   Note: Peak performance numbers of regional performance and multi regional performance are published. It is based on a 1KB single row transaction with no secondary indexes.
4. Request quota for Cloud Spanner nodes on a given region / multi-region. It can take up to 1 business day. 

Setting up Cloud Spanner

Creating the schema for Cloud Spanner

You can use the following tools to generate a schema for Cloud Spanner if you are migrating from the following source databases. Alternatively, you can model the schema manually. Schema design has a huge performance impact, hence it is recommended to review the schema very carefully.

Note: Manual review and tuning of schema will be needed to optimize and mitigate potential hotspots. You will need to keep in mind schema design best practices when modeling your schema.

Populating seed data into Cloud Spanner

Performance of a database depends on the amount of data present. Existing data (and indexes) determines how much data is scanned on select queries and therefore performance. Hence, it is important to seed data into Cloud Spanner before performance testing. 

For most realistic results, data should be migrated from an existing production source. Sometimes you cannot do that due to schema changes. One way is to utilize a custom ETL job to export and transform data and then import into Cloud Spanner. Another alternative could be to mock seed data using JMeter(More details in later sections).

JMeter performance tests

Writing Tests

JMeter will interact with Cloud Spanner just like your application. It will perform DML operations the same way as your application does. Hence, tests need to simulate production like transactions. For example if a transaction is made up of insert and/or update statements in several tables within transaction boundaries then JMeter should mimic the same.

JMeter has the following hierarchy:

Test Plan > Thread Group(s) > Sampler(s) (aka test)

Test plan is a top level component. It can contain global properties and libraries (like jdbc driver etc).

Thread Group(s) are representative of a database transaction. It contains one or more sampler(s). All the samplers within a thread group execute serially.

Sampler(s) should represent a single DML call. If your transaction needs to have multiple dml calls, you should create multiple samplers. Typically you will use JDBC Sampler for database calls. You can also use JSR 223 Sampler as described here, in case you need to use mutations or parallel reads etc. Results from one sampler can be passed to the next, as in real world application.

Executing tests and collecting results

JMeter tests should be executed as physically close to Cloud Spanner instances as possible to minimize network latency. Therefore it is best to execute them from Compute Engine (via private service connect) from the same region as the Cloud Spanner instance. In-case of multi region Cloud Spanner, GCE instances should be created in the Leader Region of the Cloud Spanner instance for lowest network latency.

JMeter should be executed via command line, it is a CPU intensive application so make sure you have allocated enough resources on the VM.

Refer to the Cloud Spanner monitoring dashboard to ensure that your Cloud Spanner instance’s CPU utilization is at or below the recommended values. In addition, use introspection tools to investigate performance issues with your database. 

You might need to optimize your queries (add indexes) and re-execute tests in multiple waves to tune the performance as needed.

Try it yourself

Follow a detailed step by step tutorial on Measure Cloud Spanner performance test using JMeter to test Cloud Spanner performance yourself.

Point-In-Time Recovery (PITR) is a critical capability for enterprise applications.  It allows database administrators to recover from accidental data deletion by restoring their production databases to a time before the incident.  

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL launched support for PITR in July 2020, allowing you to recover from disasters like data corruption or accidental deletion by restoring your Cloud SQL instance to a previous time. We’re excited to announce an additional enhancement to PITR for Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL that makes enabling PITR an even easier decision: for instances with Point-in-Time Recovery newly-enabled, the write-ahead logs being stored for PITR operations (which are the transaction logs that are used to go back in time) will no longer consume disk storage space.  Instead, when you enable PITR for new instances, Cloud SQL will store transaction logs collected during the retention window in Google Cloud Storage, and retrieve them when you perform a restore.  Because transaction logs can grow rapidly when your database experiences a burst of activity, this move will help reduce the impact these bursts have on your provisioned disk storage.  These logs will be stored for up to seven days in the same Google Cloud region as your instance at no additional cost to you.  

PITR is enabled by default when you create a new Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL instance from the Google Cloud console, and transaction logs will no longer be stored on the instance for instances that have PITR newly enabled.  If you have already enabled PITR on your PostgreSQL instances, this enhancement will be rolled out to your instances at a later point.  If you want to take advantage of this change sooner, you can first disable and then re-enable PITR on your instance (which will reset your ability to perform a point-in-time restore to the time at which PITR was re-enabled).  On instances with this feature enabled, you’ll notice that consumed storage on your instance will reduce relative to the volume of write-ahead logs (WAL) generated by your instance.  The actual amount of storage your logs consume will vary by instance and by database activity – during busy times for your database, log size may shrink or grow.  However, these logs will now only be stored on your instance long enough to successfully replicate to any replicas of the instance and to ensure that they are safely written to Cloud Storage; afterwards, they will be removed from your instance.

We’re excited to continue to enhance Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL to ensure that disaster recovery is easy to enable, cost effective, and seamless to use.  Learn more about this change in our documentation.

In-memory data stores are a fundamental infrastructure for building scalable, high-performance applications. Whether it is building a highly responsive ecommerce website, creating multiplayer games with thousands of users, or doing real-time analysis on data pipelines with millions of events, an in-memory store helps provide low latency and scale for millions of transactions. Redis is a popular in-memory data store for use cases like session stores, gaming leaderboards, stream analytics, API rate limiting, threat detection, and more. Another in-memory data store, open source Memcached, continues to be a very popular choice as a caching layer for databases and is used for its speed and simplicity.

We’re announcing Memorystore for Memcached in beta, a fully managed, highly scalable service that’s compatible with the open source Memcached protocol. We launched Memorystore for Redis in 2018 to let you use the power of open source Redis easily without the burden of management. This announcement brings even more flexibility and choice for your caching layer. 

Highlights of Memorystore for Memcached

Memcached offers a simple but powerful in-memory key value store and is popular as a front-end cache for databases. Using Memcached as a front-end store not only provides an in-memory caching layer for faster query processing, but it can also help save costs by reducing the load on your back-end databases.

Using Memorystore for Memcached provides several important benefits:

• Memorystore for Memcached is fully open source protocol compatible. If you are migrating applications using self-deployed Memcached or other cloud providers, you can simply migrate your application with zero code changes.
• Memorystore for Memcached is fully managed. All the common tasks that you spend time on, like deployment, scaling, managing node configuration on the client, setting up monitoring, and patching, are all taken care of. You can focus on building your applications.
• Right-sizing a cache is a common challenge with distributed caches. The scaling feature of Memorystore for Memcached, along with detailed open source Memcached monitoring metrics, allows you to scale your instance up and down easily to optimize for your cache-hit ratio and price. With Memorystore for Memcached, you can scale your cluster up to 5 TB per instance.
• Auto-discovery protocol lets clients adapt to changes programmatically, making it easy to deal with changes to the number of nodes during scaling. This drastically reduces manageability overhead and code complexity.
• You can monitor your Memorystore for Memcached instances with built-in dashboards in the Cloud Console and rich metrics in Cloud Monitoring.

Memorystore for Memcached can be accessed from applications running on Compute Engine, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), App Engine Flex, App Engine Standard, and Cloud Functions.

The beta launch is available in major regions across the U.S., Asia, and Europe, and will be available globally soon.

Getting started with Memorystore for Memcached

To get started with Memorystore for Memcached, check out the quick start guide. Sign up for a $300 credit to try Memorystore and the rest of Google Cloud. You can start with the smallest instance and when you’re ready, you can easily scale up to serve performance-intensive applications. Enjoy your exploration of Google Cloud and Memorystore for Memcached.