About three years ago, JCB, one of the biggest Japanese payment companies, launched a project to develop new high-value services with agility. We set up a policy of starting small from scratch without using the existing system, which we call the concept of “Dejima”, where we focused on improving various aspects such as team structure, risk management, and application and platform development process.

Until now, large Japanese enterprises have built decision-making systems focused on eliminating unnecessary business processes and efficiently increasing quarterly profits. As a result, we are seeing more organizational structures that make it difficult to take on new challenges or experiments with trial and error. We wanted to breathe a new life into this situation, and that is how the concept of Dejima came up. In the Edo period, Japan closed its national border to other countries under its national isolation policy. At the time, Dejima was the only area where special rules were applied and allowed people from different cultures to come and go, and trade. This special rule generated the culture of inclusion and led to Dejima’s prosperity. Like Dejima, we believe that creating an organization that is independent from other business practices can be effective in enabling digital transformation for the organization. 

We have been able to make this transformation with the direct help of the Google Cloud and its products such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Spanner and Anthos Service Mesh, applying domain-driven design and microservice architecture. We named this the “JCB Digital Enablement Platform (JDEP),” which now hosts multiple business critical production services.

A key benefit of GKE is that the team can easily add resources and release them when they are finished, allowing them to be flexible to accommodate busy periods and off-seasons. Meanwhile, Anthos Service Mesh helps us manage complex environments easily. With containerization and managed services, we are prepared for the future for when more services go into production, as it would be easy to maintain and provide version upgrade support. At the same time, Cloud Spanner ensures that we maintain a 99.99% availability at all times.

Our initial motivation for introducing SRE practices was to break proverbial walls between business, development and operations, which was a success. Now we are focused on ensuring its reliability and maintaining customer satisfaction with our SRE practices.

To ensure the success of SRE practices that we implemented, there were a few categories we needed to address, from defining the organizational culture and practices to ensuring the policies attached to the new models created were practical enough to be implemented on the ground level. This is so that the Dejima concept remains sustainable for the long run.  

Instilling a culture of measurement 

Here, “appropriate” reliability is the key. According to the conventional way of thinking at JCB, “service failure must not occur” and “SLA should be maintained as high as possible.” We started by discussing what was the “appropriate reliability” that our customers really needed, but it was not as easy as we thought because the level of reliability for user satisfaction differed from application to application. 

Eventually, the business, development and operations teams formulated specific SLIs and SLOs together, something we would never have been able to do if we discussed separately. This is because the business is required to compromise on lower service levels, since our reliability standard used to be too high. The collaboration of development and operations teams is necessary to understand how our system works upon our users’ interactions.

After Google Cloud helped us run a series of workshops where all teams participated, we saw change within the organization. The business team started evangelizing SRE to other members in the business department, and the development and operations teams started collaborating autonomously. We felt like we were working at Google speed, accomplishing so much in a short amount of time. 

Understanding SRE as an entire company is necessary to progress. We are now working on creating internal training materials to spread the SRE concept throughout the company.

Eliminating ambiguity

With the cooperation of Google Cloud, we have created a Team Charter that defines the team’s mission, values and engagement models. We also created policy documents that include Incident Response Policy, Postmortem Policy, On-call Policy, Toil Policy and Error Budget Policy, to eliminate ambiguity in day-to-day operations.

For example, when an incident occurs, we can identify exactly the level of importance, the roles that are assigned to each person, and in what order they need to follow. When to do a postmortem, who owns it? What to do if the error budget is exhausted? How do other teams reach out to SRE when they have problems? The written policy documents will dramatically improve efficiency and motivate teams to adopt a culture of learning from failures.

The format for such policies are written in Google’s SRE book, but when we adopt it, it needs to take into account the circumstances specific to our company. Simply copying an existing policy won’t work, which is why it’s important to formulate a policy that fits the situation each team is in.

Reformalizing teams

Based on these policies, JCB’s SRE team has two sub-teams. One is called Sheriff which works as the platform SRE, and provides infrastructure services for the application team. The other is called the Diplomat which works as the embedded SRE, and participates in the application team to lead productionisation. There is also a team called Architecture that is separate from the SRE teams whose role is to consult SRE on system design and review architecture.

The SRE team was a single role when it was first launched, but now has two sub-teams. This is because as the number of application teams increases, the number of support tasks for the teams also increases, which can result in a shortage of resources to work on overall improvement. Securing people who are not interrupted from day-to-day support tasks and focusing on the main task improves efficiency.

Whereas both sub-teams share the on-call duty, some engineers are not allowed to do it by contract as they are not allowed to get paged. For those who cannot participate in on-call duties, we created what’s called a Toil Shift, which allows them to focus on resolving tickets in our backlogs instead.

This works well so far, but we will keep evolving as our business grows.

Businesses around the globe are realizing the benefits of replacing legacy data silos with cloud-based enterprise data warehouses, including easier collaboration across business units and access to insights within their data that were previously unseen. However, bringing data from numerous disparate data sources into a single data warehouse requires you to develop pipelines that ingest data from these various sources into your enterprise data warehouse. Historically, this has meant that data engineering teams across the organization procure and implement various tools to do so. But this adds significant complexity to managing and maintaining all these pipelines and makes it much harder to effectively scale these efforts across the organization. Developing enterprise-grade, cloud-native pipelines to bring data into your data warehouse can alleviate many of these challenges. But, if done incorrectly, these pipelines can present new challenges that your teams will have to spend their time and energy addressing. 

Developing cloud-based data ingestion pipelines that replicate data from various sources into your cloud data warehouse can be a massive undertaking that requires significant investment of staffing resources. Such a large project can seem overwhelming and it can be difficult to identify where to begin planning such a project. We have defined the following principles for data pipeline planning to begin the process. These principles are intended to help you answer key business questions about your effort and begin to build data pipelines that address your business and technical needs. Each section below details a principle of data pipelines and certain factors your teams should consider as they begin developing their pipelines.

Principle 1: Clarify your objectives

The first principle to consider for pipeline development is clarify your objectives. This can be broadly defined as taking a holistic approach to pipeline development that encompasses requirements from several perspectives: technical teams, regulatory or policy requirements, desired outcomes, business goals, key timelines, available teams and their skill sets, and downstream data users. Clarifying your objectives clearly identifies and defines requirements from each key stakeholder at the beginning of the process and continually checks development against these requirements to ensure the pipelines built will meet these requirements.This is done by first clearly defining the desired end state for each project in a way that addresses a demonstrated business need of downstream data users. Remember that data pipelines are almost always the means to accomplish your end state, rather than the end state itself. An example of an effectively defined end-state is “enabling teams to gain a better understanding of our customers by providing access to our CRM data within our cloud data warehouse” rather than “move data from our CRM to our cloud data warehouse”. This may seem like a merely semantic difference, but framing the problem in terms of business needs helps your teams make technical decisions that will best meet these needs. 

After clearly defining the business problem you are trying to solve, you should facilitate requirement gathering from each stakeholder and use these requirements to guide the technical development and implementation of your ingestion pipelines. We recommend gathering stakeholders from each team, including downstream data users, prior to development to gather requirements for the technical implementation of the data pipeline. These will include critical timelines, uptime requirements, data update frequency, data transformation, DevOps needs, and security, policy, or regulatory requirements by which a data pipeline must meet.

Principle 2: Build your team

The second principle to consider for pipeline development is build your team. This means ensuring you have the right people with the right skills available in the right places to develop, deploy, and maintain your data pipelines. After you have gathered your pipeline requirements, you can begin to develop a summary architecture that will be used to build and deploy your data pipelines. This will help you identify the human talent you will need to successfully build, deploy, and manage these data pipelines and identify any potential shortfalls that would require additional support from either third-party partners or new team members.

Not only do you need to ensure you have the right people and skill sets available in aggregate, but these individuals need to be effectively structured to empower them to maximize their abilities. This means developing team structures that are optimized for each team’s responsibilities and their ability to support adjacent teams as needed.

This also means developing processes that prevent blockers to technical development whenever possible, such as ensuring that teams have all of the appropriate permissions they need to move data from the original source to your cloud data warehouse without violating the concept of least privilege. Developers need access to the original data source (depending on your requirements and architecture) in addition to the destination data warehouse. Examples of this are ensuring that developers have access to develop and/or connect to a Salesforce Connected App or read access to specific Search Ads 360 data fields.

Principle 3: Minimize time to value

The third principle to consider for pipeline development is minimize time to value. This means considering the long-term maintenance burden of a data pipeline prior to developing and deploying it in addition to being able to deploy a minimum viable pipeline as quickly as possible. Generally speaking, we recommend the following approach to building data pipelines to minimize their maintenance burden: Write as little code as possible. Functionally, this can be implemented by:

1. Leveraging interface-based data ingestion products whenever possible. These products minimize the amount of code that requires ongoing maintenance and empower users who aren’t software developers to build data pipelines. They can also reduce development time for data pipelines, allowing them to be deployed and updated more quickly. 

• Products like Google Data Transfer Service and Fivetran allow for managed data ingestion pipelines by any user to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, file systems, and other tooling. With little to no code required, these managed services enable you to connect your data warehouse to your sources quickly and easily.
• For workloads managed by ETL developers and data engineers, tools like Google Cloud’s Data Fusion provide an easy-to-use visual interface for designing, managing and monitoring advanced pipelines with complex transformations.

2. Whenever interface-based products or data connectors are insufficient, use pre-existing code templates. Examples of this include templates available for Dataflow that allow users to define variables and run pipelines for common data ingestion use cases, and the Public Datasets pipeline architecture that our Datasets team uses for onboarding.

3. If neither of these options are sufficient, utilize managed services to deploy code for your pipelines. Managed services, such as Dataflow or Dataproc, eliminate the operational overhead of managing pipeline configuration by automatically scaling pipeline instances within predefined parameters.

Principle 4: Increase data trust and transparency

The fourth principle to consider for pipeline development is increase data trust and transparency. For the purposes of this document, we define this as the process of overseeing and managing data pipelines across all tools. Numerous data ingestion pipelines that each leverage different tools or are not developed under a coordinated management plan can result in “tech sprawl”, which significantly increases the management overhead of data ingestion pipelines as the quantity of data pipelines increases. This becomes especially cumbersome if you are subject to service-level agreements, or legal, regulatory, or policy requirements for overseeing data pipelines. Preventing tech sprawl is, by far, the best strategy for dealing with it by developing streamlined pipeline management processes that automate reporting. Although this can theoretically be achieved by building all of your data pipelines using a single cloud-based product, we do not recommend doing so because it prevents you from taking advantage of features and cost optimizations that come with choosing the best product for your use case. 

A monitoring service such as Google Cloud Monitoring Service or Splunk that automates metrics, events, and metadata collection from various products, including those hosted in on-premise and hybrid computing environments, can help you centralize reporting and monitoring of your data pipelines. A metadata management tool such as Google Cloud’s Data Catalog or Informatica’s Enterprise Data Catalog can help you better communicate the nuances of your data so users better understand which data resources are best fit for a given use case. This significantly reduces your pipeline’s governance burden by eliminating manual reporting processes that often result in inaccuracies or lagging updates.

Principle 5: Manage costs

The fifth principle to consider for pipeline development is manage costs. This encompasses both the cost of cloud resources and the staffing costs necessary to design, develop, deploy, and maintain your cloud resources. We believe that your goal should not necessarily be to minimize cost, but rather maximizing the value of your investment. This means maximizing the impact of every dollar spent by minimizing waste in cloud resource utilization and human time. There are several factors to consider when it comes to managing costs:

• Use the right tool for the job – Different data ingestion pipelines will have different requirements for latency, uptime, transformations, etc. Similarly, different data pipeline tools have different strengths and weaknesses. Choosing the right tool for each data pipeline can help your pipelines operate significantly more efficiently. This can reduce your overall cost, free up staffing time to focus on the most impactful projects, and make your pipelines much more efficient.
• Standardize resource labeling –  Implement and utilize a consistent labeling schema across all tools and platforms to have the most comprehensive view of your organization’s spending. One example is requiring all resources to be labeled by the cost center or team at time of creation. Consistent labeling allows you to monitor your spend across different teams and calculate the overall value of your cloud spending.
• Implement cost controls – If available, leverage cost controls to prevent errors that result in unexpectedly large bills. 
• Capture cloud spend – Capture your spend on all cloud resource utilization for internal analysis using a cloud data warehouse and a data visualization tool. Without it, you won’t understand the context of changes in cloud spend and how they correlate with changes in business.
• Make cost management everyone’s job – Managing costs should be part of the responsibilities of everyone who can create or utilize cloud resources. To do this well, we recommend making cloud spend reporting more transparent internally and/or implementing chargebacks to internal cost centers based on utilization.

Long-term, the increased granularity in cost reporting available within Google Cloud can help you better measure your key performance indicators. You can shift from cost-based reporting (i.e. – “We spent $X on BigQuery storage last month”) to value-based reporting (i.e. – “It costs $X to serve customers who bring in $Y revenue”). 

To learn more about managing costs, check out Google Cloud’s “Understanding the principles of cost optimization” white paper.

Principle 6: Leverage continually improving services

The sixth principle is leverage continually improving services. Cloud services are consistently improving their performance and stability, even if some of these improvements are not obvious to users. These improvements can help your pipelines run faster, cheaper, and more consistently over time. You can take advantage of the benefits of these improvements by:

• Automating both your pipelines and pipeline management: Not only should data pipelines be automated, but almost all aspects of managing your pipelines can also be automated. This includes pipeline/data lineage tracking, monitoring, cost management, scheduling, access management and more. This helps reduce long-term operational costs of each data pipeline that can significantly alter your value proposition and prevent any manual configurations from negating the benefits of later product improvements.
• Minimizing pipeline complexity whenever possible: While ingestion pipelines are relatively easy to develop using UI-based or managed services, they also require continued maintenance as long as they are in use. The most easily maintained data ingestion pipelines are typically the ones that minimize complexity and leverage automatic optimization capabilities. Any transformation in a data ingestion pipeline is a manual optimization of the pipeline that may struggle to adapt or scale as the underlying services improve. You can minimize the need for such transformations by building ELT (extract, load, transform) pipelines rather than ETL (extract, transform, load) pipelines. This pushes transformations down to the data warehouse that is use a specifically optimized query engine to transform your data rather than manually configured pipelines.

Next steps

If you’re looking for more information about developing your cloud-based data platform, check out our Build a modern, unified analytics data platform whitepaper. You can also visit our data integration site to learn more and find ways to get started with your data integration journey.

Once you’re ready to begin building your data ingestion pipelines, learn more about how Cloud Data Fusion and Fivetran can help you make sure your pipelines address these principles.