Customers need scale and flexibility from their cloud and this extends into supporting services such as monitoring and logging. Google Cloud’s Monitoring and Logging observability services are built on the same platforms used by all of Google that handle over 16 million metrics queries per second, 2.5 exabytes of logs per month, and over 14 quadrillion metric points on disk, as of 2020. However, you let us know through consistent feedback that the previous construct of Workspaces for Cloud Monitoring was not providing the flexibility needed for your larger scale projects.

Cloud Operation’s New Approach to Multi-Project Monitoring

We’re happy to announce a new model for multi-project monitoring, which replaces the concept of Workspaces. This overhaul is geared toward maximizing the flexibility you have to manage your monitoring environments by introducing Metrics Scopes. Starting today you can associate your Google Cloud projects with multiple Metrics Scopes! Like Workspaces, Metrics Scopes will still be used to store all of the configuration content for dashboards, alerting policies, uptime checks, notification channels, and group definitions. However there is no limit to the number of Metrics Scopes to which you can associate a project. Prior to this change, a project could only be scoped with a single Workspace. Now, there are virtually unlimited possibilities for how you can set up multi-project monitoring. This unlocks a large variety of options, from more granular permissions to mission-focused configurations. At its most simple implementation though: operators/SREs can now create org-wide Metrics Scopes with monitoring configurations focused on infrastructure health. And developers can leverage Metrics Scopes built on a subset of their organization’s projects that allow them to focus on their application’s performance.

How it works

• When you have a collection of projects, Metrics Scopes enable you to view each project’s metrics in isolation as well as in combination with metrics stored by other projects. 
• The Metrics Scope is hosted by a scoping project. This scoping project is the Cloud project that is selected in the Cloud Console project picker.

Example

• In this example, Project-SRE is the name of a scoping project to monitor your fleet. You added two developer teams’ projects: Project-Dev-1 and Project-Dev-2, to Project-SRE’s Metrics Scope. If you select Project-SRE with the Cloud Console project picker and then go to the Monitoring page, you view the metrics for all three projects: 

• If you select Project-Dev-1 with the Cloud Console project picker and then go to the Monitoring page, you view the Metrics Scope for Project-Dev-1 and you can only see the metrics for that project:

What else is new?

• Metrics Scopes can now monitor up to 375 projects (up from 100).
• New projects automatically start working in Cloud Monitoring without the previous 60-second Workspace creation process.
• If you want to monitor more than one project simply add it to your Metrics Scope:

Navigation

• Mentioned earlier, the Project Picker in the Cloud Console can be used to navigate between Metrics Scopes in Cloud Monitoring:

• This is now consistent with many other services across Google Cloud. Specifically, you can see how the project picker stays consistent when navigating from Cloud Monitoring to Cloud Logging:

• Additionally, to make your navigation between Metrics Scopes easy we’ve added the new Metrics Scope Tab and Panel in the UI:

Coming Soon

• The Metrics Scope API is coming within the next quarter! This API will enable you to programmatically manage your monitoring configurations and Metrics Scopes.

Current Workspaces users

If you are already using Workspaces in Cloud Monitoring you may have noticed that they converted to Metrics Scopes weeks ago. There is no additional action required and you can start taking advantage of the additional features of Metrics Scopes today.

Get Started

Companies that are digitally native or in the process of digital transformation have placed an increased operational role on developers and this often creates overlapping sets of responsibilities with Operations and SRE teams. Now multiple developer teams can focus on optimizing the performance of their applications while operators can take a fleet-wide view when maintaining and improving the performance of all of the infrastructure under their purview.For information on configuring a Metrics Scope to include metrics for multiple projects, see Viewing metrics for multiple projects.

To help secure increasingly complex and dynamic cloud environments, many security teams are turning to attack path analysis tools. These tools can enable them to better prioritize security findings and discover pathways that adversaries can exploit to access and compromise cloud assets such as virtual machines, databases, and storage buckets.

Other attack path tools rely on static, point-in-time snapshots of an organization’s cloud footprint, which often contain sensitive data about their environment, how it is configured, and where the most sensitive data resides.

At Google Cloud, we are taking a different approach. We are excited to announce today at the Google Cloud Security Summit that we are adding attack path simulation to Security Command Center, our built-in security and risk management solution for Google Cloud. This new risk management capability automatically analyzes a customer’s Google Cloud environment to pinpoint where and, importantly, how vulnerable resources may be attacked, so security teams can stay one step ahead of adversaries.

We expect attack path simulation capabilities to be available in Security Command Center Premium later this summer.

Unlike some third-party security products, Security Command Center continuously scans an organization’s cloud environment gathering near real-time data about cloud resources and security vulnerabilities. Our attack path simulation engine uses this information to automatically generate and render high-risk attack paths, without the hands-on toil of having to repeatedly run manual queries.

A different approach to attack path analysis

Other attack path analysis tools involve significant operational toil. The static, point-in-time snapshots that these tools generate have to be sent to an external provider, which can add risk. Then security teams have to follow up with complex queries before they can identify likely attack paths. 

Google Cloud’s advanced attack simulation engine leverages our first-party, agentless visibility of Google Cloud assets, the relationships between assets, and the current state of defenses. Attack path simulation is fully automated with no need to manually run queries. Simulations run in the Google Cloud environment, and do not send snapshots outside your environment, avoiding exposure of sensitive information.

See what attackers can see

Effective attack path analysis should mimic how a real-world attacker can reach and compromise high value resources. This is why Security Command Center simulates how attackers try many different ways to infiltrate a cloud environment. SCC then generates attack path graphs to give defenders insight into how adversaries could exploit a single security weakness or various combinations of security vulnerabilities to access valuable assets. SCC also provides detailed information on how to remediate issues and shore up defenses based on its findings

We are delivering combined attack path simulation and analysis as a managed service. There are no agents to install or manage. Results automatically reflect changes in your organization’s Google Cloud environment. Because our attack path simulations are conducted on models of an organization’s cloud resources, there is no performance or operational impact to the live production environment.

Better security prioritization

Security Command Center automatically computes an attack exposure score for misconfigurations and vulnerabilities that expose valuable resources to attackers. The score is a measure of cyber risk. It takes into account how exposed valued resources are, and the paths of least resistance for attackers to reach those resources. 

Security teams can use these scores to prioritize remediation efforts and improve their overall risk posture.

How attack path analysis has already reduced risk for customers 

Dozens of customers have already used our attack path capabilities in private Preview to improve their security posture and reduce their operational risk.

Security Command Center alerted one customer to a finding with a high attack exposure score. The finding was related to a service account whose keys were not being rotated. After reviewing the attack paths related to this finding, the cloud security manager discovered that even though the service account was named “test,” it provided access to storage buckets outside of the test environment. 

If an attacker had been able to steal the credentials for this test account, they could have easily accessed production data. The security manager removed administrator privileges on the account. The attack path simulation enhanced their understanding of the severity of the finding, and helped convince them to make it a high-priority fix.  

Another customer using attack path simulation needed to assess which security findings created the greatest risk. Two findings related to the same service account with high exposure scores rose to the top of the list. The attack paths revealed that the service account had access to more than 500 storage buckets. If an attacker were to gain access to this account they would be able to read, write, or delete data across any of those buckets, many of which contained sensitive business data and confidential customer information.

Using Security Command Center’s attack path results, the security team remediated the risk by limiting permissions to the storage buckets needed for that specific role.  

Next steps

Attack path simulation capabilities are planned for availability later this summer.  We expect forthcoming enhancements to use Security AI Workbench to translate complex attack graphs to human-readable explanations of attack exposure, including impacted assets and recommended mitigations.

You can learn more about Nordnet Bank’s experience using attack path simulation at our Security Summit session. To get started with Security Command Center today, please go to the Google Cloud console.

I’m excited to share our first Cloud CISO Perspectives post of 2022. It’s already shaping up to be an eventful year for our industry and we’re only in month one. There’s a lot to recap in this post, including the U.S. government’s recent efforts to address critical security issues, like open source software security and zero trust architectures. We’ve also released new resources from our Google Cybersecurity Action Team like the Cloud Security Megatrends and the Boards of Directors whitepaper on cloud risk governance. 

Cloud Security Megatrends 

We’re often asked if the cloud is more secure than on-prem (and why) so we shared our answer in a recent blog post. At Google Cloud, security by design is our priority. We’ve long adopted zero-trust principles for our baseline security architectures and built a global network that relies on defense in depth layers to protect against configuration errors and attacks. But security is always evolving and that is why we also take advantage of the following megatrends:

1. Economy of scale: Decreasing the marginal cost of security raises the baseline level of security. 
2. Shared fate: A flywheel of increasing trust drives more transition to the cloud, which compels even higher security and even more skin-in-the-game from the cloud provider.
3. Healthy competition: The race by deep-pocketed cloud providers to create and implement leading security technologies is the tip of the spear of innovation. 
4. Cloud as the digital immune system: Every security update the cloud gives the customer is informed by some threat, vulnerability, or new attack technique often identified by someone else’s experience. Enterprise IT leaders use this accelerating feedback loop to get better protection.
5. Software-defined infrastructure: Cloud is software defined, so it can be dynamically configured without customers having to manage hardware placement or cope with administrative toil. From a security standpoint, that means specifying security policies as code, and continuously monitoring their effectiveness.
6. Increasing deployment velocity: Because of cloud’s vast scale, providers have had to automate software deployments and updates, usually with automated continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) systems. That same automation delivers security enhancements, resulting in more frequent security updates.
7. Simplicity: Cloud becomes an abstraction-generating machine for identifying, creating and deploying simpler default modes of operating securely and autonomically. 
8. Sovereignty meets sustainability: The cloud’s global scale and ability to operate in localized and distributed ways creates three pillars of sovereignty. This global scale can also be leveraged to improve energy efficiency.

If you’re an IT decision maker, pay attention to these megatrends that will continue to drive and reinforce cloud security and will outpace the security of on-prem infrastructure well into the future. 

U.S. Federal government cybersecurity momentum 

• Open source software security: Earlier this month, Google participated in the White House Summit on open source software security. The meeting came at a critical time for the industry following December’s Log4j vulnerabilities and was both a recognition of the challenge and an important first step towards addressing it. The open source software ecosystem is not homogenous, despite the fact that the industry often thinks of or treats it this way. Some of it, like Linux, is highly curated, while other critical software is supported through diffuse communities including technology companies and other stakeholders. There is also a long tail of many other critical projects driven by a dedicated community of maintainers around the world, including Googlers. In light of this reality, we welcomed the chance to share our recommendations to advance the future of open source software security. Some work we’ve done includes founding the Open Source Security Foundation, which has been instrumental already in making security improvements. We’ve also helped drive a number of key security initiatives within the open source community including security scorecards, the SLSA framework to improve the security and integrity of open source packages, and Secure Open Source Rewards to financially incentivize improvements to critical open source security projects.  
• OMB’s Federal zero trust strategy: The publication of the Office of Management and Budget’s zero trust architecture strategy marks an important step for the U.S. federal government’s efforts to modernize under Executive Order 14028. Google Cloud supports this approach, which recognizes the immense security benefits offered by modern computing architectures. For the past decade, Google has successfully applied zero trust principles through our BeyondCorp and BeyondProd frameworks for providing end-user access and securing our cloud workloads. And we’ve brought these best practices from our own journey to global governments and businesses of any size through solutions like BeyondCorp Enterprise and capabilities like Binary Authorization and Anthos Service Mesh, which are embedded in Anthos, our managed application platform. For Federal agencies embarking on this zero trust journey, the Google Cybersecurity Action Team will offer our expertise by conducting Zero Trust Foundations strategy workshops, which can help organizations in the public and private sectors develop actionable and achievable strategies and plans for zero trust implementation. 

Google Cybersecurity Action Team Highlights 

Here are the latest updates, products, services and resources across our security teams this month: 

Security

• Democratizing security operations: We recently announced that Siemplify, a leading security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) provider, is joining Google Cloud to help companies better manage their threat response. Providing a proven SOAR capability with Chronicle’s approach to security analytics is an important step forward in our vision to advance invisible security and democratize security operations for every organization.
• Security by design: The Highmark Health security team is using “secure-by-design” techniques to address the security, privacy, and compliance aspects of its Living Health solution with Google Cloud’s Professional Services Organization (PSO). Google has long advocated for and followed security by design principles, which is why we’re continuously building enhanced security, controls, resiliency and more into our cloud products and services. 
• Secure collaboration for hybrid work environments: The Google Workspace team shared its recommendations for businesses as they prepare for the future of work,  where the hybrid/flexible work model is becoming standard practice and a new approach to security is essential.
• Anthos Policy Controller CIS Benchmark enforcement: A big part of our shared fate philosophy is to build secure products and not just security products. A recent example of this in action is embedding CIS benchmark policy conformance in the Anthos Policy Controller. We believe the more we embed approaches like this into our products, the more application and infrastructure teams can intrinsically embed security at the start and reduce toil for the security team.
• DevOps for technology-driven organizations and startups: A key success factor for many security programs is the partnership and integration with development teams, and there are some great resources and lessons in our DORA research.
• Security by design with Chrome OS: ABN AMRO’s Asia-Pacific region team recently shared how they are using Chrome OS and CloudReady to work securely in the cloud, reduce total cost of ownership, and add flexibility for employees. This is a great example of secure by design principles in the use of Chromium.

Risk & Compliance

• Boards of Directors summary guide to cloud risk governance: The latest whitepaper from the Google Cybersecurity Action Team outlines how boards of directors can prioritize safe, secure, and compliant adoption processes for cloud technologies within their organizations.  
• TruSight Risk Assessment of Google Cloud: TruSight recently released a comprehensive
  risk assessment report on Google Cloud. Our Enterprise Trust team collaborated on this robust assessment of Google Cloud services to validate the design and implementation of controls. TruSight’s risk assessment of our security controls will help customers accelerate and complete their risk management due diligence.
• Data governance: Check out this new blog series on data governance where our teams explain the role of data governance, its importance, and the necessary processes to run an effective data governance program. Implementing data governance will help maximize value derived from business data, build user trust, and ensure compliance with required security measures.

Controls and Products

• Encrypting Data Fusion: To help meet the security, privacy and compliance requirements of customers in regulated industries like finance or public sector, we announced the general availability of Customer Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) integration for Cloud Data Fusion, which enables encryption of both user data and metadata at rest with a key that customers can control through our Cloud Key Management Service (KMS). 

Don’t forget to sign-up for our newsletter if you’d like to have our Cloud CISO Perspectives post delivered every month to your inbox. We’ll be back next month with more updates and security-related news.

Organizations in every region and industry are developing APIs to enable easier and more standardized delivery of services and data for digital experiences. This increasing shift to digital experiences has grown API usage and traffic volumes. However, as malicious API attacks also have grown, API security has become an important battleground over business risk.

To help customers more easily address their growing API security needs, Google Cloud is announcing today the Preview of Advanced API Security, a comprehensive set of API security capabilities built on Apigee, our API management platform. Advanced API Security enables organizations to more easily detect security threats. Here’s a closer look at the two key functionality included in this launch: identifying API misconfigurations and detecting bots.

Identify API misconfigurations

Misconfigured APIs are one of the leading reasons for API security incidents. In 2017, Gartner® predicted that by 2022 API abuses will be the most frequent attack vector resulting in data breaches for enterprise web applications. Today, our customers tell us application API security is one of their top concerns, which is supported by an independent study from 2021 by Fugue and Sonatype. The report found that misconfigurations are the number one cause of data breaches, and that “too many cloud APIs and interfaces to adequately govern” are frequently the main point of attack in cyberattacks.

While identifying and resolving API misconfigurations is a top priority for many organizations, the configuration management process can be time consuming and require considerable resources.

Advanced API Security can make it easier for API teams to identify API proxies that do not conform to security standards. To help identify APIs that are misconfigured or experiencing abuse, Advanced API Security regularly assesses managed APIs and provides API teams with a recommended action when configuration issues are detected.

Advanced API Security identifies misconfigured API proxies, including the missing CORS policy.
APIs form an integral part of the digital connective tissue that make modern medicine run smoothly for patients and healthcare staff. One common healthcare API use case occurs when a healthcare organization inputs a patient’s medical coverage information into a system that works with insurance companies. Almost instantly, that system determines the patient’s coverage for a specific medication or procedure, a process which is enabled by APIs. Because of the often-sensitive personal healthcare data being transmitted, it is important that the required authentication and authorization policies are implemented so that only authorized users, such as an insurance company, can access the API.

Advanced API Security can detect if those required policies have not been applied, an alert which can help reduce the surface area of API security risks. By leveraging Advanced API Security, API teams at healthcare organizations can more easily detect misconfiguration issues and can reduce security risks to sensitive information.

Detect Bots

Because of the increasing volume of API traffic, there is also an increase in cybercrime in the form of API bot attacks—the automated software programs deployed over the Internet for malicious purposes like identity theft.

Advanced API Security uses pre-configured rules to help provide API teams an easier way to identify malicious bots within API traffic. Each rule represents a different type of unusual traffic from a single IP address. If an API traffic pattern meets any of the rules, Advanced API Security reports it as a bot.

Additionally, Advanced API Security can speed up the process of identifying data breaches by identifying bots that successfully resulted in the HTTP 200 OK success status response code.

Financial services APIs are frequently the target of malicious bot attacks due to the high-value data that is processed. A bank that has adopted open banking standards by making APIs accessible to customers and partners can use Advanced API Security to make it easier to analyze traffic patterns and identify the sources of malicious traffic. You may experience this when your bank allows you to access your data with a third-party application. While a malicious hacker could try to use a bot to access this information, Advanced API Security can help the bank’s API team to identify and stop malicious bot activity in API traffic.

API Security at Equinix

Equinix powers the world’s digital leaders, bringing together and interconnecting infrastructure to fast-track digital advantage. Operating a global network of more than 240 data centers with a 99.999% or greater uptime, Equinix simplifies global interconnections for organizations, saving customers time and effort with the Apigee API management platform.

“A key enabler of our success is Google’s Apigee, delivering digital infrastructure services securely and quickly to our customers and partners,” said Yun Freund, senior vice president of Platform at Equinix. “Security is a key pillar to our API-first strategy and Apigee has been instrumental in enabling our customers to securely bridge the connections they need for their businesses to easily identify potential security risks and mitigate threats in a timely fashion. As our API traffic has grown, so has the amount of time and effort required to secure our APIs. Having a bundled solution in one managed platform gives us a differentiated high-performing solution.”

Getting started

To learn more, check out the documentation or contact us to request access to get started with Advanced API Security.

To learn more about API security best practices, please register to attend our Cloud OnAir webcast on Thursday, July 28th, 2:00 pm PT.

The future of AI is better AI—designed with ethics and responsibility built in from the start. This means putting the brakes on AI-driven transformation until you have a well-functioning strategy and process in place to ensure your models deliver fair outcomes. Failing to recognize this imperative is a threat to your bottom line. The following post provides a simple framework to follow to keep your business on the right track as you place more trust in algorithms. 

AI is inherently sociotechnical. AI systems represent the interconnectedness of humans and technology. They are designed to be used by and to inform humans within specific contexts, and the speed and scale of AI means that any lack of responsibility—such as bias, safety, privacy, scientific excellence etc—will also replicate at that same speed and scale. Without ethics and responsibility built in by design, AI systems lack the critical “inputs” or societal context that enable long term success. 

Lawsuits stemming from AI systems that are biased towards certain groups are stacking up. In August 2020, IBM was forced to settle a lawsuit with the city of Los Angeles for misappropriating data it collected for its weather channel app. Health services company, Optum, is being investigated by regulators for creating an algorithm that allegedly recommended that doctors and nurses pay more attention to white patients than to sicker black patients. And Facebook, which granted Cambridge Analytica, a political firm, access to the personal data of more than 50 million people, is buried in legal work.  Google has also run into its share of issues with algorithms making egregious mistakes. 

While lawsuits are real, the foundational reason ethical AI is critical to your bottom line is trust. Without it, increasingly, consumers will ignore you and choose a brand they do trust. Research from Kantar, which runs one of the largest global brand equity studies (4 million consumers, 18,000 brands, across 50 markets), revealed that almost 9% of a brand’s equity is driven by corporate reputation, of which responsibility is a key attribute. Over the last decade, the importance of responsibility to consumers in relation to making brand choices has tripled. 

The study stated brands perceived to be among the world’s most trusted and responsible shared three crucial factors that proved particularly important for building consumer trust and confidence, even when a brand might be new to a market. These are:

• Honesty and openness
• Respect and inclusion
• Identifying with and caring for customers

Brands that develop these associations more strongly tend to outperform their competitors in defending and growing their brand value.

Technology and business leaders need to focus on four areas to accomplish a well-functioning ethical AI strategy. Lopez Research refers to this group of tasks as SEED, which stands for security, ethics, explainability, and data (SEED). Each of these topics could be an article in itself, but this post will define several essential components. 

SECURITY (S)  

It might not seem obvious, but a robust AI strategy requires an embedded security strategy. Companies should look for hardware-level security in components such as GPUs and CPUs. IT leaders should build software security into models to minimize attacks such as poisoning, evasion, deepfakes, backdoors, and model extraction. The threat of adversarial data poisoning attacks machine learning models by maliciously introducing inaccurate data designed to corrupt the model’s ability to be accurate. Another security threat is model extraction, also known as model cloning, where a hacker finds a way to either reconstruct a black-box machine learning model or extract the training data. The first line of defense against all security attacks is to design security at the outset, but the next best step is to frequently test models to ensure they are operating as planned. Business leaders, data science experts, and IT leaders must work together to regularly review the outcomes of AI models.

ETHICS (E)

Today, organizations must understand that ethics should be designed into the solution at its outset. The ethics process starts with defining the potential positive and negative outcomes of the model that your business is creating. Once the team has evaluated potential harmful effects, which means unpacking the systems, beliefs, power hierarchies and dynamics that interconnect with the technology, it’s your responsibility to eliminate or minimize the impact of these outcomes. It’s also critically important to review the impact of models in production and shut down models demonstrating issues. An example of this was the public beta release of the Tay chatbot that Microsoft deployed and rapidly shut down because it propagated negative biases. 

Yet, many organizations aren’t taking this action. The FICO study revealed that 93% of companies said responsible AI was critical for success but only 33% of these companies were measuring AI model outputs to ensure these models were operating as expected (measuring for model drift). Another survey by Pew Research revealed that 68% believe that ethical principles focused primarily on the public good will not be employed in most AI systems by 2030. 

Regulations may turn this tide, regardless of whether organizations plan to adopt an ethical AI framework. Laws governing the ethical use of data in AI are expected to be finalized as soon as 2022, such as the European Commission’s proposed legal framework for AI. Organizations that start with ethical use of AI in mind will be better positioned to deal with customer privacy concerns and regulatory compliance.

EXPLAINABILITY(E)

As models have become more sophisticated, it’s also become increasingly difficult to explain why a model created a specific outcome. In the FICO Responsible AI  report, 65% of respondents could not explain how specific AI model decisions or predictions are made, and only 35% said their organization made an effort to use AI in a way that was transparent and accountable.  However, it’s never been more important to clarify how AI models came to conclusions such as why a loan was denied, why a particular strategy should be implemented, and how AI selected a set of resumes to review for a position. The goal is to create an explainable AI model from the outset but many of today’s models lack this capability. Every business should review its existing models and use open-source toolkits that can be found on Github.com that support the interpretability and explainability of machine learning models. 

Keep in mind that explainability isn’t one-size-fits-all. Different stakeholders need different types of information. Much of explainability to date has focused on “opening the black box” which gets equated to information that is only useful for other data scientists. That’s important, but it doesn’t help the line of business users whose workflows AI is integrated into, or end users who deserve information about how decisions are made; or policymakers who don’t have data science backgrounds, and so on. 

DATA (D) 

An equally important item in ethics is data. Ethics starts with ensuring you have the correct data to create and update models. Three main issues include representative data, inherent biases within existing data, and inaccurate data. A critical issue that most companies miss in creating models is that current data sets frequently lack full market representation. A recent Capgemini Research Institute report revealed that 65% of executives “were aware of the issue of discriminatory bias” with these systems.

Awareness is the first step, but organizations must take action to remedy this issue. Historical data may no longer serve a company’s current needs for model creation. Historical records may contain biases against certain groups. For example, historical criminal data records show an imbalance in ethnic groups’ incarceration, which would lead to model biases. Additionally, laws and societal norms also change. Certain groups were prosecuted for sexual preference in the past, but today this information would create an inaccurate model. 

Companies have also discovered that using demographic data, a common practice in marketing, can also lead to model bias. For example, individuals that primarily used cash for transactions and others that lived in specific zip codes were at a disadvantage in banking models to determine creditworthiness. To minimize these issues, a company needs to augment its data with full representation in areas such as ethnicity, gender, age, behavioral and economic profiles.

Design AI models with a continuous feedback loop

Another, more prominent, yet tricky issue is data accuracy. As the adage says, garbage in, equals garbage out. The least appreciated but arguably the most essential component of the AI model lifecycle is ensuring the model has accurate data at all times. Inaccurate data from either poor data hygiene or data that was tampered with for security purposes can cause model failures. Organizations need to invest the time and resources to ensure they have the correct data. Data privacy is another key element that businesses must address, but the concepts of data privacy, sovereignty, and security are significant enough that we will come back to this in a separate article. 

Overall, it’s clear that while we may have an abundance of data, it most likely doesn’t represent what we want to model for the future. A successful AI strategy is an ethical AI strategy that requires the organization to be thoughtful in its model creation by ensuring it has a broad representation of accurate data and testing the outcomes to ensure the models are secure and operating as expected. 

Organizations that define an AI model lifecycle with a continuous feedback loop will reap the benefits of better intelligence. This will increasingly mean stronger, longer lasting trust with customers and staying on the right side of new laws and regulations.